Tech

Review: Specialized Rumor Elite

By Kylie · 41 comments

The Rumor Elite is part of Specialized’s range of women’s specific mountain bikes. It is an alloy, dual-suspension 29er, featuring 110mm of travel front and rear. Specialized describe it as an “XC Trail” bike, meaning it offers a touch more travel and trail oriented geometry than a traditional XC bike such as the Epic (or the women’s specific Era), allowing the rider to get a little more playful and confident on the trail.

ccs-62657-0-68889200-1436348623.jpg

I have developed an interest in women’s specific bicycles and equipment as a direct result of my own quest to find the right bike. The process involved trying and testing as many bikes as I could get my hands on, and reading as many reviews as possible. Obviously if you are a woman lucky enough to fit comfortably on a man’s bike: problem solved. Better chances of resale, plus a wider range of options, usually with higher spec componentry mean you have a lot more to choose from. If like me, you struggle to find a comfortable fit on a man’s bike, then you are left sifting through the “shrinked and pinked” department. Fortunately for me, the Rumor saved the day, and what follows is what I have found during my first few months with the bike.

I tried both the Era and the Rumor on the same trails, and have to say I loved both bikes. The Era offers lightning-quick handling and acceleration, while the Rumor feels more stable at speed, and a little more forgiving of rider error.

ccs-62657-0-22491000-1436347988.jpg
ccs-62657-0-26616400-1436347993.jpg
ccs-62657-0-95637600-1436347997.jpg

First Impressions:

The Rumor Elite comes in stealthy black with aggressive red decals. I love that it does not look girly or insipid. It looks mean and capable: a bike that is meant to be ridden hard. Up front is a Rockshox Revelation RC fork, and the rear suspension features a custom Fox Float CTD. A huge plus for me is the Command 3-position dropper seatpost, as I like to be able to drop my saddle on the fly for trickier descents. My only concern is the extra weight of an alloy frame. I enjoy both trail riding and marathon races, and want to keep climbing as manageable as possible.

ccs-62657-0-05060800-1436348004.jpg
ccs-62657-0-81945800-1436348570.jpg
ccs-62657-0-12409300-1436347974.jpg
ccs-62657-0-83173900-1436347977.jpg
ccs-62657-0-20040400-1436347982.jpg

Riding:

Since my first ride the Rumor hasn’t stopped surprising me. I expected ponderous handling, and to struggle on the climbs with the 29er “wagon wheels”, compared with my old 650b hardtail. While I have had to learn to be a bit more committed in turns, I have not found the handling to be a problem. Similarly, the comfortable geometry and extra traction from the rear suspension has made climbing easier (just don’t ask me to say this after 70+km).

ccs-62657-0-57943200-1436354375.jpg

With the dropper post lever, front and rear shifters, and having to remember to adjust suspension settings while riding, I initially felt a bit like I was piloting the Deathstar. I have however, gotten very comfortable with adjusting the settings on the suspension while riding, depending on the situation (climb mode on the shock is particularly useful for jeep tracks), and have grown to accept the cluttered cockpit, since I find the 2X10 setup invaluable when my legs give up.

ccs-62657-0-05055500-1436347955.jpg
ccs-62657-0-50274800-1436347962.jpg
ccs-62657-0-69656900-1436348587.jpg
ccs-62657-0-45309300-1436347969.jpg

My only gripe with the standard setup of the bike was the sizing of the front chainrings. The bike comes with 34-22T front rings and an 11-36T rear cassette, which I found to be an unnecessarily gentle ratio, seemingly based on the assumption that women riders can’t turn a bigger gear. I found I was spinning out on gradual descents where I would have liked to pick up some speed, and the granny gear was not entirely necessary. I suspect the same would apply to most other riders. A 1X11 setup (such as is found on the Rumour EVO model) would be ideal, but I went for a more budget friendly option- to upsize the front rings. I also swapped out the standard stem and bars for a shorter 50mm stem and the 720mm bars that I prefer.

ccs-62657-0-65998200-1436348591.jpg
ccs-62657-0-03579100-1436348596.jpg
ccs-62657-0-21295100-1436348576.jpg
ccs-62657-0-48527100-1436348582.jpg

I have found the women’s specific Myth saddle to be very comfortable, even on long days out. I also appreciate the low standover height, which makes getting on and off in awkward situations a lot easier. I don’t know how the designers at Specialized managed it: but I can still fit a normal bottle in using a side entry cage, although I do sometimes knock the CTD lever on the shock when I pull the bottle out in a hurry.

ccs-62657-0-59211500-1436348600.jpg
ccs-62657-0-50095700-1436348605.jpg

Verdict:

I have found the Rumor to be the perfect all-rounder for my varied needs. It has seen me happily bashing up and down all my favourite trails, as well as suffering through a few marathons in (relative) comfort. In an ideal world I would love a carbon frame, but since this isn’t an option for the current Rumor models, and my budget probably wouldn’t stretch to it if it was, I am happy to work a little harder and enjoy the security of not worrying about damaging an expensive frame every time I hug a tree. In fact, I can’t wipe the grin off my face most days after a ride.

2015 Specialized Rumor Elite specification:

FrameM5 hydroformed alloy, Women’s XC Trail 29er Geometry, women’s tubesets w/ tapered headtube, DMD mounts, SRAM FD adaptor, 110mm travelShockCustom FOX Float CTD Performance w/ AUTOSAG, Climb, Trail, Descend settings, rebound adjust, 197x48mmForkRockShox Revelation RC 29, tapered alloy steerer, w/ lockout, compression, rebound adjust, 15mm thru-axle, 110mm travelHeadset1-1/8″ and 1-1/2″ threadless, Campy style upper with 1-1/2″ lower, cartridge bearingsStemSpecialized XC, 3D forged alloy, 4-bolt, 6-degree riseHandlebarsSpecialized XC, mini rise, 6000 butted alloy, 8-degree backsweep, 6-degree upsweep, 10mm rise, 31.8mmGripsSpecialized Women’s Enduro XL, lock-on, closed end, 125mmBrakesShimano SLX BR-M675, hydraulic disc, metallic padsBrake leversShimano SLX BL-M675, hydraulic, alloy leverFront derailleurSRAM X7, 2×10, S3 direct mountRear derailleurShimano XTR Shadow Plus, 10-speed, GS mid cageShifter leversShimano SLX, 10-speed, triggerCassetteSRAM PG 1030, 10-speed, 11-36ChainSRAM PC 1031, 10-speed, w/ PowerLink, nickel finishCranksetCustom SRAM S-2200, carbon, PF30 spindle, 104/64mm BCD spiderBottom bracketSRAM, PF30, OS press-in bearings, sealed cartridgeRimsRoval Control 29, alloy, 21mm inner width, 32hFront hubRoval Control 29, 15mm thru-axle, 32hRear hubRoval Control 29 142+, 12mm thru-axle, 32hSpokesDT Swiss RevolutionFront tyreSpecialized Ground Control, 60TPI, 2Bliss Ready, folding bead, 29×2.3″Rear tyreSpecialized Ground Control, 60TPI, 2Bliss Ready, folding bead, 29×2.1″SaddleBody Geometry Women’s Myth Comp, hollow Cr-Mo rails, 155mmSeatpostCommand Post BlackLite, alien head design, single bolt head, w/ remote adjust lever, 30.9mm, S: 75mm travel, Others: 100mmSeat binderCommand Post, single bolt, 34.9mm

Related posts

Comments

Skylark

Jul 13, 2015, 9:05 AM

Looks like Spez designed the cross bar so ladies could ride with a dress. Nothing like hitting the trails in a nice summer frock!

Go Spez!!

J∆kk∆ls

Jul 13, 2015, 9:13 AM

I wonder if Spez designed this bike to perform with a juice filled bottle stuck in the middle of the frame? Why even bother, given what this machine was intended for!?!

Iwan Kemp

Jul 13, 2015, 11:27 AM

Ever lay awake at night wondering "what exactly was the purpose of the comment I posted on The Hub today?"

Kylie

Jul 13, 2015, 11:34 AM

The low standover is great, whether I choose to wear a dress or not.

 

So is being able to carry juice, which can be useful while riding. Just wondering what you think this " machine was intended for".

Iwan Kemp

Jul 13, 2015, 11:49 AM

Cool review and pics. Have a friend who's looking to buy one - have shared it with her.

Mntboy

Jul 13, 2015, 12:12 PM

The low standover is great, whether I choose to wear a dress or not.

 

So is being able to carry juice, which can be useful while riding. Just wondering what you think this " machine was intended for".

To be ridden, one would hope!

 

Nice review. Will definitely point any lady to it whose considering buying a new bike.

J∆kk∆ls

Jul 13, 2015, 12:19 PM

The low standover is great, whether I choose to wear a dress or not.

 

So is being able to carry juice, which can be useful while riding. Just wondering what you think this " machine was intended for".

Not a fan of bottles on MTB is all. Having a look at this bikes geometry I would imagine blasting down and over hills with lots of berm destroying would suite it best!  (Please restore all berm destroyed)

Odinson

Jul 13, 2015, 12:39 PM

Another great review, Kylie!

 

Must agree with Kylie. The gearing seems quite low, but it's an easy fix and shouldn't be seen as a deal breaker. 

 

Of all the major brands, Spez is probably the most committed to creating women-specific bikes for all different riding styles. 

Kylie

Jul 13, 2015, 12:41 PM

Not a fan of bottles on MTB is all. Having a look at this bikes geometry I would imagine blasting down and over hills with lots of berm destroying would suite it best!  (Please restore all berm destroyed)

 

The bike is definitely suited to some hill blasting.

 

Although not pretty- I think a bottle cage is still a plus for many riders (I don't enjoy carrying a pack)- and easier to remove than add on afterwards. 

Iwan Kemp

Jul 13, 2015, 1:09 PM

The bike is definitely suited to some hill blasting.

 

Although not pretty- I think a bottle cage is still a plus for many riders (I don't enjoy carrying a pack)- and easier to remove than add on afterwards. 

 

Bike needs minimum 1 cage mount to make my shopping list. Like you say, easy enough to leave it off than having to figure a way to carry a bottle on a bike.

 

Even better yet is a frame that can take 2 bottles. It matters to most

MarickH

Jul 13, 2015, 1:31 PM

"I love that it does not look girly or insipid."

 

Thank you for pointing this out. I really hate bikes that try to be overly girly by painting the bike in colours they believe are feminine and all women will like.

Skylark

Jul 13, 2015, 2:04 PM

The low standover is great, whether I choose to wear a dress or not.

 

So is being able to carry juice, which can be useful while riding. Just wondering what you think this " machine was intended for".

What's the point of the noticeably lower looking standover height than normal other than wearing a dress or why would they possibly need to do that? Nothing wrong with dresses, many men wear them in some cultures.

 

Isn't it a bit of an unnecessary cliche to make a ladies frame like that?

 

I'd think its the blokes if any thing, from an ergonomic perspective that is, that could at times truely appreciate a very low standover height?

nonky

Jul 13, 2015, 2:12 PM

great review; nice bike.

Hairy

Jul 13, 2015, 2:49 PM

Not a fan of bottles on MTB is all. Having a look at this bikes geometry I would imagine blasting down and over hills with lots of berm destroying would suite it best!  (Please restore all berm destroyed)

would never want to own a frame again that does not hold at least 1 x water bottle ... been full hydration pack before and won't very easily do that again!

Kylie

Jul 13, 2015, 3:26 PM

"I love that it does not look girly or insipid."

 

Thank you for pointing this out. I really hate bikes that try to be overly girly by painting the bike in colours they believe are feminine and all women will like.

100% agree, hopefully one day manufacturers will stop plastering most women's bike in pink. 

Kylie

Jul 13, 2015, 3:46 PM

What's the point of the noticeably lower looking standover height than normal other than wearing a dress or why would they possibly need to do that? Nothing wrong with dresses, many men wear them in some cultures.

 

Isn't it a bit of an unnecessary cliche to make a ladies frame like that?

 

I'd think its the blokes if any thing, from an ergonomic perspective that is, that could at times truely appreciate a very low standover height?

 

Fair enough. I have rather short legs and I find the low standover height makes getting on and off easier. However, it depends entirely on the individual, and definitely isn't necessary in all cases.

JXV

Jul 13, 2015, 4:06 PM

Nice review!

 

I ride 1x10 with a 34 chainring on 29er and also find I spin out on flat stuff but most women riders I know prefer to spin their pedals a lot faster than me so the lowish gearing is probably suitable for most of the target market.

If you're a fitter/stronger female rider then no problem to change it. Most shops would likely swap it out at little or no cost to make the sale happen.

Odinson

Jul 13, 2015, 5:35 PM

What's the point of the noticeably lower looking standover height than normal other than wearing a dress or why would they possibly need to do that? Nothing wrong with dresses, many men wear them in some cultures.

 

Isn't it a bit of an unnecessary cliche to make a ladies frame like that?

 

I'd think its the blokes if any thing, from an ergonomic perspective that is, that could at times truely appreciate a very low standover height?

 

Bud, you need a lesson in female anatomy. 

 

In general, women have shorter legs (in proportion to overall height) than men. Thus, providing a sloped toptube allows for women riders to be more comfortable mounting and dismounting the bike. 

Skylark

Jul 13, 2015, 6:16 PM

Bud, you need a lesson in female anatomy.

 

In general, women have shorter legs (in proportion to overall height) than men. Thus, providing a sloped toptube allows for women riders to be more comfortable mounting and dismounting the bike.

But not to that degree?

 

And they have made the point of the lowest standover height in the middle of the crossbar and then made it taper up towards the seatpost, that makes no sense wouldn't you want the crossbar height tapering down to the lowest point virtually at the seatpost if its to address stand over height?

 

That's really what caught my eye.

 

Unless maybe the designer had some far out whacky idea and saw dresses being ridden with the bike and made the lowest height in the middle to suit that?

 

Who knows, I'm just speculating, don't shoot the messenger

Iwan Kemp

Jul 13, 2015, 6:22 PM

But not to that degree?

 

And they have made the point of the lowest standover height in the middle of the crossbar and then made it taper up towards the seatpost, that makes no sense wouldn't you want the crossbar height tapering down to the lowest point virtually at the seatpost if its to address stand over height?

 

That's really what caught my eye.

 

Unless maybe the designer had some far out whacky idea and saw dresses being ridden with the bike and made the lowest height in the middle to suit that?

 

Who knows, I'm just speculating, don't shoot the messenger [emoji16]

 

First, and I do realize I'm bordering on grammar Nazi country here, but it's called a Top Tube. 

 

Secondly, look at where the tip of the saddle is and draw a line 90 degree with the ground and you'll see that this is where the lowest point on the top tube needs to be.

 

Thirdly, dropping it down that low allows a straight line running up from the rear axle, through the seat stays, link, through the shock to the shock mount point. It all works out that way playing nicely with ratios, lengths and tech bits.

 

Last, but not least, NO one designs a MTB with a dress wearing rider in mind.

NixM

Jul 13, 2015, 6:31 PM

 .

 

Last, but not least, NO one designs a MTB with a dress wearing rider in mind.

Oh come on you know you love the feeling of the breeze between your legs when you ride in your skirt!

Iwan Kemp

Jul 13, 2015, 6:35 PM

Oh come on you know you love the feeling of the breeze between your legs when you ride in your skirt!

 

;)

Skylark

Jul 13, 2015, 7:31 PM

 

 

Thirdly, dropping it down that low allows a straight line running up from the rear axle, through the seat stays, link, through the shock to the shock mount point. It all works out that way playing nicely with ratios, lengths and tech bits.

That part is just gibberish.

 

On this bike, at the tip of the saddle if I draw a line 90 degree with the ground, I get to just about where the seatpost meets the top tube and that is not where the lowest point on the top tube is, its quite a bit more forward, granted its not much but still it looks a little peculiar.

 

But I'll agree that I erred when calling the top tube the cross bar, my apologies, I plan to not let you down in that regard again. Truth be told they are interchangeable but I also prefer top tube over cross bar, its just a more modern and succinct interpretation. :whistling:

Odinson

Jul 13, 2015, 7:50 PM

 

That part is just gibberish.

 

On this bike, at the tip of the saddle if I draw a line 90 degree with the ground, I get to just about where the seatpost meets the top tube and that is not where the lowest point on the top tube is, its quite a bit more forward, granted its not much but still it looks a little peculiar.

 

But I'll agree that I erred when calling the top tube the cross bar, my apologies, I plan to not let you down in that regard again. Truth be told they are interchangeable but I also prefer top tube over cross bar, its just a more modern and succinct interpretation. :whistling:

 

 

It's quite simple. Look at the bike side-on. You'll see what he's on about. 

Add a comment

You must log in to comment