Tips and Advice

Why should you train with a heart rate monitor?

By Press Office · 33 comments

To reach your fitness goals and maintain them, you need to train smarter, not harder and this can be achieved by understanding your heart. Your “maximum heart rate” is the maximum number of times your heart beats in one minute. To calculate an average reading of your max heart rate, take the number 220 for men or 226 for women and minus your age. For Example 226 – 30 = 196; a 30 year old woman’s max heart rate is 196 beats per minute.

Once you have your max heart rate, you can calculate your unique heart rate zones. These will help you determine where you need to keep your heart rate while training. The graph below shows you the different heart rate zones labelled 1 to 5.

If you don’t have access to a table indicating your zones, you can calculate them by working out the different percentages using your max heart rate. This will give you a range in which you need to keep your heart rate in. For Instance Zone 3 is 70% to 80% of your max heart rate. So 70% = 137 and 80% = 157. This means that in order to stay in zone 3 your heart rate needs to be between 137 and 157 beats per minute.

ccs-62657-0-43382800-1424684745.jpg

Once you understand zones, you need to understand what they mean to you so you can train within them. This is important because each person is exercising for a different goal, some want to lose weight and others may want to increase their fitness level. You need to train in the correct zone in order to achieve your goals and keep motivated.

Zone 1 (heart rate is between 50 to 60% of your max heart rate) is a beginner’s level of aerobic training and consists of moderate activity or a warm up. You should be feeling relaxed, warming up at an easy pace and your breathing should be rhythmic. If your goal is to lose weight, you won’t achieve it in zone 1. You need to be exercising more vigorously to increase your heart rate.

Zone 2 (60-70%) is your weight control zone. You should be working out in a comfortable pace where you have slightly deeper breaths but can still have a conversation. If you are looking to lose weight, you should make sure your heart rate is in zone 2.

Zone 3 (70-80%) is your aerobic zone for those whose goals are to increase their fitness or cardio ability. You should be working out at a moderate pace and it should be more difficult to hold conversation. This will increase your cardio ability and improve your aerobic capacity.

Zone 4 (80-90%) is your anaerobic zone for hard core training. You will be working out at a fast pace and feel a bit uncomfortable. Your breathing will begin to feel a bit forceful but you will develop improved anaerobic capacity, increased strength and improved speed.

Zone 5 (90-100%) is your maximum effort zone. You should be sprinting as fast as you can but you won’t be able to sustain your pace and effort for too long. Your breathing will be laboured but you will develop muscular endurance and increased power when reaching this zone in your work outs.

If you aren’t wearing a heart rate monitor while you train you won’t know what your heart is doing and in which zone you are training in. Garmin’s range of heart rate monitors have 2 electrodes on the inside of the strap and these electrodes press against your skin and pick up the pulses made by your heart beating. This information is then transmitter to your Garmin fitness watch using ANT+ technology.

Garmin has a range of fitness watches, ranging from entry level to advanced. Visit the http://www.garmin.co.za/onto-fitness.php to find a fitness watch that suites your needs.

Related posts

Comments

milky4130

Feb 23, 2015, 8:14 PM

A much more accurate 'rule of thumb' to estimate Max HR .... If you cannot afford a scientific test.... Is 220-(n*0.64) where n= your age. This method lowered my max HR to a much more realistic level that I could actually get to. Read it in a local bike Sept 2014...

this formula doesn't correspond to the scientific test, more than 10 beats higher. Whereas the articles formula is spot on with the scientific test.

blondeonabike

Feb 23, 2015, 8:15 PM

Is there a relationship between people that have larger volume hearts having lower maximum heart rates?  I heard something along these lines recently and wondered if it is true. 

Mads

Feb 23, 2015, 8:50 PM

220-34=186 pretty accurate for me.

My max was also tested a few years ago and it is exactly what the formula calculates for my age.  (What ever that may be. :D :D )

milky4130

Feb 23, 2015, 9:48 PM

My max was also tested a few years ago and it is exactly what the formula calculates for my age.  (What ever that may be. :D :D )

Nice Mads, no wonder you do so well with LSD rides  :thumbup:

nickelass

Feb 24, 2015, 4:07 AM

I find its motivates me to ride harder, when using a heart rate monitor,have figured out my own perceived effort , and an average value,based on my statistics for the last four years , sometimes though I do not use it ,as I am doing a fun ride, and it does not count for training.

WeskusKlong

Feb 24, 2015, 10:07 AM

 

 

Well, i was pushing hard during the PPA this weekend. I was starting to feel a but fatiqued and when i looked at my garmin it was reporting a heart rate of 218bpm my max is suppose to be 185. I stopped for 5min and the groups past me by (very sad) while i rested a bit. Can this be geniune or is this a bug? Sounds a bit high to me.

This is a common problem on heart rate monitors - mostly happens when experiencing dry headwinds or cycling at speed (downhill etc). Caused by static electricity from cycling shirt rubbing against the sensor. Had this on my Polar and Garmin Edge 305 as well. Seems like it has been sorted on the Garmin Edge1000 though.

 

When it happens again, press against your chest where the sensor is - stopping the rubbing of the shirt against the sensor, the heart rate figure should drop back to normal (until you release again :-)). I also found that it does not happen with certain types of shirts - such as winter garments with more wool woven into the material. 

PrinceVlad

Feb 26, 2015, 7:36 PM

Interetingly, I watched the highlights of the Ironman 70.3 and out of the top 5 males it seemed as is three (including the winner) didn't wear a HRM. The top female also went without. There must be merit in not using a HRM

SwissVan

Feb 26, 2015, 7:58 PM

Interetingly, I watched the highlights of the Ironman 70.3 and out of the top 5 males it seemed as is three (including the winner) didn't wear a HRM. The top female also went without. There must be merit in not using a HRM

 

But do they wear a HRM when they are training?

A lot of people don't like to race with a HRM in case it "interferes" with their race plan....

WrightJnr

Feb 27, 2015, 4:08 AM

I know a few very fast Ironmen. They all use HRM and Power in training and exclusively use TrainingPeaks with a coach. All race without HRM. Feedback is that they know their bodies so well after all that training it offers no value in a race. But definitely used in training.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment