Events

Italian mountain biker Riccardo Chiarini has tested positive for EPO

By BikeHubCoreAdmin · 87 comments

Italian mountain biker Riccardo Chiarini, who finished fourth overall in the 2014 Absa Cape Epic with partner Roel Paulissen of Belgium (Team Torpado Factory), has tested positive for unusually high levels of EPO.

ccs-2-0-00772600-1402558836.jpgImage Credit: Nick Muzik/Cape Epic

The former road professional was tested out-of-competition on May 7 this year by the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI). The finding of excessive EPO (erythropoietin) was made in terms of the biological passport system. Torpado, the Italian bicycle manufacturer and team sponsor, confirmed it had been informed of the positive test results and had suspended the rider with immediate effect pending any appeal.

The Absa Cape Epic last year introduced a zero tolerance approach to doping in terms of which anybody found guilty of an offence committed after December 31, 2012, would be banned from the event for life. “As things stand, therefore, Chiarini is suspended from the Absa Cape Epic and will be given a lifetime ban if the finding is confirmed,” said Absa Cape Epic spokesperson Chris Whitfield.

Chiarini and Paulissen won Stage 5 of the 2014 Absa Cape Epic on their way to the fourth place overall. In terms of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) testing protocol, at least one of the Torpado riders would have been tested after winning the stage. The South African Institute for Drug Free Sport (SAIDS), which carried out the testing at the Absa Cape Epic for the UCI, has not yet released its findings.

Because Chiarini’s out-of-competition test was carried out after the Absa Cape Epic, it does not effect his 2014 race results.

The biological passport system depends on testing of an individual athlete’s biological markers over a period of time. Doping violations are detected by noting variances from established levels.

The Absa Cape Epic’s rule on doping states: “Any person who is under provisional or final sanction by an Anti-Doping Organisation with jurisdiction under the WADA Code (a “person under sanction”) is prohibited from participating or being involved in the race, whether as a rider, team manager or official or in any other capacity whatsoever. Where any such sanction has been made final for an offence committed after 31 December 2012, such prohibition shall apply for the life of the person under sanction (irrespective of the duration of the sanction imposed by the relevant Anti-Doping Organisation).”

Related posts

Comments

Eugene Oppelt

Jun 12, 2014, 6:06 PM

Good!

Cheaters are caught.

 

This will go on for a while more

Poor cycling - beaten black 'n blue already

NOFX

Jun 13, 2014, 5:06 AM

Yawn.........

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 5:31 AM

Were Torpado not instrumental in Topeak Ergon's effort to win the Epic? I seem to recall that they assisted on one of the stages which may have changed the dynamics of the event. It is one more reason to disallow any form of technical support (from riders and tech zones) in the event. Imagine Topeak lost another 7 or 8 minutes with that technical. We may have been robbed of some serious racing over the last few stages.

It never is as simple as striking a team from the time sheets.

rouxtjie

Jun 13, 2014, 5:34 AM

Were Torpado not instrumental in Topeak Ergon's effort to win the Epic? I seem to recall that they assisted on one of the stages which may have changed the dynamics of the event. It is one more reason to disallow any form of technical support (from riders and tech zones) in the event. Imagine Topeak lost another 7 or 8 minutes with that technical. We may have been robbed of some serious racing over the last few stages.

It never is as simple as striking a team from the time sheets.

Good point...yea torpado gave topeak a wheel...if it wasn't for that wheel it would have been bye bye GC for sure if I remember correctly....

Tumbleweed

Jun 13, 2014, 5:35 AM

Were Torpado not instrumental in Topeak Ergon's effort to win the Epic? I seem to recall that they assisted on one of the stages which may have changed the dynamics of the event. It is one more reason to disallow any form of technical support (from riders and tech zones) in the event. Imagine Topeak lost another 7 or 8 minutes with that technical. We may have been robbed of some serious racing over the last few stages.

It never is as simple as striking a team from the time sheets.

 

Nope.

 

The rule is thus:

 

 

9.4 Any rider may receive physical assistance from his/her team partner or from a fellow competitor. For purposes hereof, “physical assistance” shall mean the sharing of water and nutrition, sharing of bike parts and accessories (including the swopping of bike frames), assistance with maintenance and repair, and pushing/towing by physical contact only.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 5:37 AM

 

Nope.

 

The rule is thus:

 

 

9.4 Any rider may receive physical assistance from his/her team partner or from a fellow competitor. For purposes hereof, “physical assistance” shall mean the sharing of water and nutrition, sharing of bike parts and accessories (including the swopping of bike frames), assistance with maintenance and repair, and pushing/towing by physical contact only.

 

So if Bulls 2 and 3 were to load up with dopers to get Bulls 1 over the line in 1st place its all good? Surely the rules need a review.

rouxtjie

Jun 13, 2014, 5:45 AM

So if Bulls 2 and 3 were to load up with dopers to get Bulls 1 over the line in 1st place its all good? Surely the rules need a review.

I hear you....its is however a bit of a slippery slope if you want to rewrite the history books.

Tumbleweed

Jun 13, 2014, 5:53 AM

So if Bulls 2 and 3 were to load up with dopers to get Bulls 1 over the line in 1st place its all good? Surely the rules need a review.

 

You're assuming that all teams will do this.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 5:58 AM

 

You're assuming that all teams will do this.

I've learnt that if you assume that they are all cheats you are less disappointed when they get caught. It also liberates you to enjoy the spectacle rather than wonder whether it is with or without 'help' that these athletes perform on super-human levels for 8 days.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 6:01 AM

I hear you....its is however a bit of a slippery slope if you want to rewrite the history books.

Not at all, but when you spot a trend it would be in the sport's best interest to be pro active about it. It would also level the playing field somewhat if there are not 4x backup spares horses to swap parts from opposed to the smaller teams where riders have to be more cautious.

Tumbleweed

Jun 13, 2014, 6:03 AM

I've learnt that if you assume that they are all cheats you are less disappointed when they get caught. It also liberates you to enjoy the spectacle rather than wonder whether it is with or without 'help' that these athletes perform on super-human levels for 8 days.

 

Fair enough. But I kinda like the idea that there are pacts, tactics, etc playing out on the course.

rouxtjie

Jun 13, 2014, 6:06 AM

Not at all, but when you spot a trend it would be in the sport's best interest to be pro active about it. It would also level the playing field somewhat if there are not 4x backup spares horses to swap parts from opposed to the smaller teams where riders have to be more cautious.

Again...I hear you...its perhaps not the best two man team that takes the win, but the best team outfit. They are however just playing the cards they are dealt, since the rules allow this.

 

PS my best epic result would have to be nico and gawie two years ago I think....when they slummed it in the tents. No backups, no personal mech's, nothing fancy....

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 6:07 AM

Fair enough. But I kinda like the idea that there are pacts, tactics, etc playing out on the course.

I appreciate the balance between light weight equipment, vs more robust equipment and the fine balance that has to be sought to ensure that your equipment go all the way. Much like the gearbox and engine rule in F1. Having a B or C team bringing up the rear with no intention to win dilutes this with the big name teams and means that the smaller teams cannot take the same risks.

Tumbleweed

Jun 13, 2014, 6:36 AM

I appreciate the balance between light weight equipment, vs more robust equipment and the fine balance that has to be sought to ensure that your equipment go all the way. Much like the gearbox and engine rule in F1. Having a B or C team bringing up the rear with no intention to win dilutes this with the big name teams and means that the smaller teams cannot take the same risks.

 

Would a compromise of limiting all elite teams to an A and B work for you?

jcza

Jun 13, 2014, 6:42 AM

Procycling is like sausage, I love it but I don't want to know how its made.

ryanbritchford

Jun 13, 2014, 6:55 AM

How many more have to be caught before everyone sees that they all use banned substances. Just some are smarter than others, Lance told us this. Are we not being naive to believe that some men can naturally achieve what others are doing heavy doping to achieve? I think so. That's my little input. Just watch the race and enjoy it, gonna be many more people busted in the future.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 7:01 AM

Would a compromise of limiting all elite teams to an A and B work for you?

Only if accepting assistance is limited to getting help from a B -team member. Otherwise Bulls 3 may well enter as Not_the_Bulls, not be part of the official team setup and still end up influencing the race. If a B-team member is found to be positive, the A team should be DQ'd too, whether assistance was received or not.

Gerry Hattrick

Jun 13, 2014, 7:45 AM

Good point...yea torpado gave topeak a wheel...if it wasn't for that wheel it would have been bye bye GC for sure if I remember correctly....

It was Centurion Vaude who helped Topeak - on two stages

rouxtjie

Jun 13, 2014, 7:49 AM

It was Centurion Vaude who helped Topeak - on two stages

My bad :blush:

Brian Fantana

Jun 13, 2014, 8:17 AM

It was Centurion Vaude who helped Topeak - on two stages

 

+1.

 

Tumbleweed

Jun 13, 2014, 8:22 AM

 

Only if accepting assistance is limited to getting help from a B -team member. Otherwise Bulls 3 may well enter as Not_the_Bulls, not be part of the official team setup and still end up influencing the race. If a B-team member is found to be positive, the A team should be DQ'd too, whether assistance was received or not.

 

I can live with that.

Danger Dassie

Jun 13, 2014, 12:12 PM

Only if accepting assistance is limited to getting help from a B -team member. Otherwise Bulls 3 may well enter as Not_the_Bulls, not be part of the official team setup and still end up influencing the race. If a B-team member is found to be positive, the A team should be DQ'd too, whether assistance was received or not.

 

 

Based on what? The assumption the A team doped or received some kind of assistance due to the doping positive in the B team?

That's very open ended.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 3:05 PM

 

 

Based on what? The assumption the A team doped or received some kind of assistance due to the doping positive in the B team?

That's very open ended.

Based on someone with a positive test that influenced the results. If the B team dope up to keep up with the A team incase they need assistance or to attack other contenders both A and B teams should be DQ'd and banned for life. If you are worried, ride without a B team. Simple.

Weight Weenie

Jun 13, 2014, 4:17 PM

Hou vas, didn't Paulissen also dope at some stage? Or was it his previous epic partner?

GLuvsMtb

Jun 13, 2014, 4:18 PM

Ban was only imposed for positive tests post 2012 I think?

Add a comment

You must log in to comment