Events

Italian mountain biker Riccardo Chiarini has tested positive for EPO

By BikeHubCoreAdmin · 87 comments

Italian mountain biker Riccardo Chiarini, who finished fourth overall in the 2014 Absa Cape Epic with partner Roel Paulissen of Belgium (Team Torpado Factory), has tested positive for unusually high levels of EPO.

ccs-2-0-00772600-1402558836.jpgImage Credit: Nick Muzik/Cape Epic

The former road professional was tested out-of-competition on May 7 this year by the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI). The finding of excessive EPO (erythropoietin) was made in terms of the biological passport system. Torpado, the Italian bicycle manufacturer and team sponsor, confirmed it had been informed of the positive test results and had suspended the rider with immediate effect pending any appeal.

The Absa Cape Epic last year introduced a zero tolerance approach to doping in terms of which anybody found guilty of an offence committed after December 31, 2012, would be banned from the event for life. “As things stand, therefore, Chiarini is suspended from the Absa Cape Epic and will be given a lifetime ban if the finding is confirmed,” said Absa Cape Epic spokesperson Chris Whitfield.

Chiarini and Paulissen won Stage 5 of the 2014 Absa Cape Epic on their way to the fourth place overall. In terms of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) testing protocol, at least one of the Torpado riders would have been tested after winning the stage. The South African Institute for Drug Free Sport (SAIDS), which carried out the testing at the Absa Cape Epic for the UCI, has not yet released its findings.

Because Chiarini’s out-of-competition test was carried out after the Absa Cape Epic, it does not effect his 2014 race results.

The biological passport system depends on testing of an individual athlete’s biological markers over a period of time. Doping violations are detected by noting variances from established levels.

The Absa Cape Epic’s rule on doping states: “Any person who is under provisional or final sanction by an Anti-Doping Organisation with jurisdiction under the WADA Code (a “person under sanction”) is prohibited from participating or being involved in the race, whether as a rider, team manager or official or in any other capacity whatsoever. Where any such sanction has been made final for an offence committed after 31 December 2012, such prohibition shall apply for the life of the person under sanction (irrespective of the duration of the sanction imposed by the relevant Anti-Doping Organisation).”

Related posts

Comments

The Bike Vendor

Jun 14, 2014, 11:38 AM

"The former road professional was tested out..."

 

why am I not surprised.

 

En wat beteken dit nogals?

BeegMig

Jun 14, 2014, 11:45 AM

Chilliboi Rapapela!

Wonder if they will let that one slide,,, Again?

Danger Dassie

Jun 14, 2014, 4:15 PM

Based on someone with a positive test that influenced the results. If the B team dope up to keep up with the A team incase they need assistance or to attack other contenders both A and B teams should be DQ'd and banned for life. If you are worried, ride without a B team. Simple.

 

So it's based on assumption that B doped to keep up with team A?

What if team A gets bust for doping, but not B?

GLuvsMtb

Jun 14, 2014, 4:21 PM

 

So it's based on assumption that B doped to keep up with team A?

What if team A gets bust for doping, but not B?

Same punishment. Who determines which is the A ream and which is the B team? If an A team has a terrible prologue they may indadvertedly become the B team if the B team has a real podium chance. The principle of linking teams upfront cannot go with a pre determined pecking order as the dynamics may change over 8 days of racing. Much like a TDF team can elect a new team leader if they loose a prominent rider due to illness or injury.

Matchstix

Jun 20, 2014, 8:57 AM

Oh the horror, I bet he is crying himself to sleep at night because he will not be allowed to race the epic again

rouxtjie

Jun 20, 2014, 9:00 AM

Oh the horror, I bet he is crying himself to sleep at night because he will not be allowed to race the epic again

maybe, maybe not....if you are a pro roadie and you are banned from the tdf, how would that sit with you?

 

Kudos to the epic for enforcing this when the UCI is too slapgat

Matchstix

Jun 20, 2014, 9:13 AM

I get what you are saying, but still will not even compare the epic to the tdf.

rouxtjie

Jun 20, 2014, 9:17 AM

I get what you are saying, but still will not even compare the epic to the tdf.

You are right, they are not ito spectacle and money as well as coverage. But its probably the biggest / grandest mtb stage event. If I was marathon mtb pro and got caught doping...not being able to compete in my discipline's queen event would hurt.

 

Maybe BS can give us some insight into how this feels... :whistling:

Brian Fantana

Jun 20, 2014, 9:43 AM

Maybe BS can give us some insight into how this feels... :whistling:

 

 

http://img.pandawhale.com/23683-Ashton-Kutcher-burn-gif-95QB.gif

GLuvsMtb

Jun 24, 2014, 7:21 PM

You are right, they are not ito spectacle and money as well as coverage. But its probably the biggest / grandest mtb stage event. If I was marathon mtb pro and got caught doping...not being able to compete in my discipline's queen event would hurt.

 

Maybe BS can give us some insight into how this feels... :whistling:

There is not much more that The Epic can do. Maybe petition to Government to criminalize doping to the extend that offenders get jail time, much like Indian authorities have a hard line against cricketers who assist book makers. Passing legislation is a lengthy process though, but may be a worth-while investment to aid SAIDS in their mandate.

Danger Dassie

Jun 24, 2014, 8:23 PM

I get what you are saying, but still will not even compare the epic to the tdf.

 

No one is comparing the Epic and TdF, besides the fact that they're two vastly different events for different reasons.

 

Fact, he was bust doping. Fact, the sponsors immediately dropped him.

If it were me, I'd be loosing some sleep over the fact that I'd essentially been fired from my employment. Good on the Epic for taking a stance where many other UCI events are lacking.

Danger Dassie

Jun 24, 2014, 8:32 PM

Same punishment. Who determines which is the A ream and which is the B team? If an A team has a terrible prologue they may indadvertedly become the B team if the B team has a real podium chance. The principle of linking teams upfront cannot go with a pre determined pecking order as the dynamics may change over 8 days of racing. Much like a TDF team can elect a new team leader if they loose a prominent rider due to illness or injury.

 

It's clear from the teams and ranking as to A and B teams, but the very example provided makes an open ended scenario. So to apply that to a doping sanction is still open ended and won't really change anything imho.

Would like to see a deeper sanction focus beyond the athlete/s, who while guilty are often offered up as a sacrificial lamb to appease the public and allows inconsistent/corrupt officials, team staff to go unpunished.

Also a push to criminalise doping on some level, starting at school sports with a mandatory 2 year prison sentence for any adult found to be directly involved.

GLuvsMtb

Jun 25, 2014, 11:42 AM

 

It's clear from the teams and ranking as to A and B teams, but the very example provided makes an open ended scenario. So to apply that to a doping sanction is still open ended and won't really change anything imho.

Would like to see a deeper sanction focus beyond the athlete/s, who while guilty are often offered up as a sacrificial lamb to appease the public and allows inconsistent/corrupt officials, team staff to go unpunished.

Also a push to criminalise doping on some level, starting at school sports with a mandatory 2 year prison sentence for any adult found to be directly involved.

The intention of the proposal is to try and neutralise the effect that doping may have on the event. With all the pizzing into the wind to try and eliminate doping people seem to forget that even if non podium riders dope it affects results by way of a change in race dynamics. The effect is potentially profound over multiple days.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment