Events

Cape Town Cycle Tour will go ahead, detour route now 47km

By Matt · 944 comments

At a press conference a short while ago it was announced that the Cape Town Cycle Tour 2015 will go ahead with some significant changes to the route after Chapmans Peak drive is declared unsafe.

The route has been reduced to just 47km from the usual start in Cape Town CBD to Muizenberg and back.

ctct.jpg

CAPE TOWN CYCLE TOUR ANNOUNCES THE 38TH YEAR AS THE “SHOW YOU CARE SOLIDARITY RIDE”

Statement from David Bellairs:

It’s been an extremely worrying and tense week for Cape Town. For the last four days our beautiful Southern Peninsula, that the iconic Cape Town Cycle Tour traditionally passes through, has been on fire. It’s been devastating.

Fire fighters have worked day and night battling the flames in sweltering heat as experienced pilots fly choppers to drop buckets of water on the flames. Emergency teams, paramedics, health officials and disaster experts have gone the extra mile, saving lives and preventing homes from burning down.

It’s been very heartening to see how the public has responded to the crisis. They have rushed to bring necessities – eye drops, ice, drinks, food for the fire fighters. They have also pledged donations to buy much-needed resources. They have given much more than money – they have opened their hearts and given their humanity. Cape Town is a city of Good Samaritans – a city of heroes.

And we, at the Cycle Tour, are humbled by the overwhelming outpouring of good. We see that outpouring of good every single year at the Cycle Tour. The Cape Town Cycle Tour is a celebration of good times for the 35 000 people who participate in the event. We also know that so many people working tirelessly behind the scenes to make those good times possible.

This week we’ve seen people from all walks of life responding to the fires and we know that people of this great province don’t only come together for good times but also come together when there is a crisis and we share the concerns of the local community and join in rallying behind these brave firefighters.

For the Cycle Tour to be able to safely cater for the 35000 anticipated participants, we need to start placing infrastructure on the ground by tomorrow morning. For this to happen, a decision on the route needs to be made today. The decision we have made is unanimous and has not been taken lightly. It has involved extensive discussion and collaboration by all stakeholders including the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Enteleni and their consulting engineers in respect of Chapman’s Peak, City of Cape town Events Office, City of Cape Town Disaster Management Services, Provincial Emergency Medical Services and Cape Town Traffic in respect of Ou Kaapse Weg, MyCiti, Mediclinic and our Presenting Rights sponsors.

Having carefully assessed all available information, it has become clear that the safety of cyclists cannot be guaranteed on Chapman’s Peak and this rules out using this famous landmark for the 2015 event. This is largely as a result of the extensive fire which has destroyed vegetation responsible for retaining the mountainside above Chapman’s Peak. Furthermore, the heat has caused rocks to expand making them unstable and in some instances rock falls have occurred.

With Chapman’s Peak ruled out, our detour option of Ou Kaapse Weg returning to Cape Town via the M3 was considered. A number of key issues needed to be taken into account including access and egress to the South Peninsula by Emergency Services vehicles and local residents who are still under threat of fires raging in the area. The soot and ash covering both sides of the road on Ou Kaapse Weg present a considerable health risk to participants and this would be exacerbated by the likelihood of wind.

The idea of an out and back route via Main Road to Cape Point and back is impractical for an event of this size as road widths in certain areas between Fishhoek and Muizenberg narrow down to a width of four metres.

We understand that many visitors have travelled from far afield to participate in this iconic international bucket list cycling event. We are also keenly aware of the need to reduce the impact the event will have on traffic and other emergency services that are desperately needed elsewhere in the South Peninsula.

With this in mind, we have taken a bold decision and will be staging a vastly shortened version of our beloved Cape Town Cycle Tour in solidarity and support for those affected by the tragic fires burning on the mountains around Cape Town. The route will be a 47km circular route from its normal start at the Civic Centre to the end of the M3 and back the same way to a slightly altered finish in Green Point.

The unfortunate set of circumstances we face this week is unprecedented in 38 years of the Cape Town Cycle Tour. On Sunday cyclists won’t see pristine scenery as they make their way down the shortened route. They should see the smouldering landscape as a source of inspiration and pride because it represents the heroism of the men and women who have – very literally – put their bodies in the line of fire.

The ride remains a celebration of Cape Town and this wonderful Peninsula on the southern tip of Africa. The Cape Town Cycle Tour will go on because, as the fighting spirit of the people of Cape Town has demonstrated, nothing can take it away from us – not even fire.

Route Map

route.jpg

Related posts

Comments

Spank

Mar 5, 2015, 1:55 PM

Hindsight is a wonderfull thing, especialy if all the facts are now available....

Agree, but unfortunately there are many expert event organizers behind their keyboards that know better...that would still disagree.

Pity....

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:56 PM

Nope, no misunderstanding. Monday the option to ride the longer detour route over OKW was still ont he table, dependant on whether fire services were able to contain and put out the fire. At that time there was some burning that had happened, but the real issue came through Monday evening into Tuesday and Tuesday night. At that point the route became a figment of full distance imagination. How could they have annouced this earlier?

Well said, I also listen to the soundbyte now, and there DB says that they had to submit a plan on Tuesday which was out the windows that afternoon /  evening.

Hence another plan on Wednesday.

 

Everything makes more sense now. Seems they did try their best. Although DB did not say that they did or did not consider an alternate route to the southern one, I think that so much was going on that they might not even have been a thought. And in hindsight I see what they mean

Cog Masher

Mar 5, 2015, 1:57 PM

will it be possible to do a second lap if you finish before the last riders start ?

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:58 PM

will it be possible to do a second lap if you finish before the last riders start ?

 

No

 

One lap per rider

Rules are rules

cadenceblur

Mar 5, 2015, 1:59 PM

Timing will be to ensure you're an official finisher. This event will likely get all the same penalties other races of shorter distances get. It's the only way to ensure consistency across the seeding formula. Make sure you ride one of the other seeding races sometime during 2015 if you're interested in a decent start group for 2016 version.

Yeah, just keen to know. I will invariably take it easy on Sunday and wouldn't want to be penalized. I will definitely be doing other events.

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:01 PM

Why 800...the planning and permissions etc are not gonna double the cost....that probably 50 per entry at most...that's 1.75mil just there..and the city can come aboard. ...unless PPA want to be generous and part with some cash to prevent this fiasco from happening again...☺

The bulk of the cost is the start venue, finish venue and road closure fees. It is substantially more than R1,75 mil. It would probably make up the bulk of the +-R5 million cost of putting up the event. Double this and the charities get half of what they are getting this year. 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 2:02 PM

Please go check my posts again, I feel exactly the same as you.

 

I was replying to Gluhwein and to Armpies and then suddenly you tell me I am trolling

HAHA

Was surely thinking that you wanted an reaction. You never agree with me? You even said you don't like me.

 

Was just funny that you started asking the questions that I just got answers to 

 

:-)

PJP2013

Mar 5, 2015, 2:10 PM

The bulk of the cost is the start venue, finish venue and road closure fees. It is substantially more than R1,75 mil. It would probably make up the bulk of the +-R5 million cost of putting up the event. Double this and the charities get half of what they are getting this year. 

 

PPA made 4.7 million on this last year, surely they should thrown that option in for free :ph34r:

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 2:10 PM

Wow that's rich...Just stay at home then.No one cares about your opinion.Why cry about it when you know you cant do anything about it...o and please stop being a prick before saying anything about a persons attitude...If you look closely its your attitude that's spoiling it for the rest of the people who want to ride the race in good fun.

Please read the thread. Look what I said later

 

Edit, What is it with the name calling people?

 

Can you not debate?

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:11 PM

PPA made 4.7 million on this last year, surely they should thrown that option in for free :ph34r:

why would they do that? It is a vital part of PPA's funding. 

urbanroyal

Mar 5, 2015, 2:13 PM

The bulk of the cost is the start venue, finish venue and road closure fees. It is substantially more than R1,75 mil. It would probably make up the bulk of the +-R5 million cost of putting up the event. Double this and the charities get half of what they are getting this year.

And they will only use one location out of the options available....and the city will be onboard. ..no need to double the cost..????

KarlvN

Mar 5, 2015, 2:19 PM

Can't they take is to the BAck of Durbanville around Vissershok and Kottermanskloof coming in onthe West Coast road or Plattekloof road back to Town ?

 

No, actually they can't, you see I want to go ride at CONTERMANSKLOOF on Sunday after the funride, and I really do not want to get caught up in all that traffic...

GrumpyOldGuy

Mar 5, 2015, 2:20 PM

Nope, no misunderstanding. Monday the option to ride the longer detour route over OKW was still on the table, dependant on whether fire services were able to contain and put out the fire. At that time there was some burning that had happened, but the real issue came through Monday evening into Tuesday and Tuesday night. At that point the route became a figment of full distance imagination. How could they have annouced this earlier?

..and therein lies the issue "dependant on" this denotes uncertainty. The argument was rather simply remove this uncertainly and make a call based on the facts on hand at the time. People understand its a fluid issue and things can change, all they want to know is where they stand early enough so they can also make decisions, keeping them hanging till the last minute is not good PR.   

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:25 PM

And they will only use one location out of the options available....and the city will be onboard. ..no need to double the cost..

... until there is another unforeseen disaster like a Tsunami taking beach road 3 days before the event. Then every single wize-ass will ask why a backup finish venue was not in place. 

 

If you consider all the variables and the likelihood of low risk items escalating into high risk, and plan on worst case scenario on each risk aspect, you will need more than just full double redundancy. 

Imagine they had to plan for a possible gale-force wind, or a heat wave, or a building falling down in Clifton, or a storm causing a road collapse in 3 anchor bay, or flash floods... the list can go on, but I am sure you get what I am saying. 

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 2:28 PM

Just heard David Bellairs say that a proper alternative route is definitely on the cards for future CTCTs given the effect on this year's race.

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 2:29 PM

Just heard David Bellairs say that a proper alternative route is definitely on the cards for future CTCTs given the effect on this year's race.

Fantastic, so they more than likely apply and sort it proper. From Monday as suggested here.

:-)

 

I wonder if he has been reading this thread, lol

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:31 PM

..and therein lies the issue "dependant on" this denotes uncertainty. The argument was rather simply remove this uncertainly and make a call based on the facts on hand at the time. People understand its a fluid issue and things can change, all they want to know is where they stand early enough so they can also make decisions, keeping them hanging till the last minute is not good PR.   

Listen to DB's radio interview. Imagine they made the call on Monday, and the wind changed  that evening and the route was ride-able. There is not much change in your original planning for the day, apart from finishing in about half the time, so the missus may have to come pick you up earlier. I will probably take a ride home afterwards rather than try and find parking in Green Point. It will add another 25 odd kms to my ride. 

GrumpyOldGuy

Mar 5, 2015, 2:32 PM

Just heard David Bellairs say that a proper alternative route is definitely on the cards for future CTCTs given the effect on this year's race.

Indeed, one hopes they learn from it. History is an important part of risk assessment and if it means future events will have a proper viable alternative, then one can say it hasn't been in vain.

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:33 PM

Fantastic, so they more than likely apply and sort it proper. From Monday as suggested here.

:-)

 

I wonder if he has been reading this thread, lol

Lets just hope that no unforeseen disaster pops up rendering the alternative, alternative route unride-able. 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 2:34 PM

Listen to DB's radio interview. Imagine they made the call on Monday, and the wind changed  that evening and the route was ride-able. There is not much change in your original planning for the day, apart from finishing in about half the time, so the missus may have to come pick you up earlier. I will probably take a ride home afterwards rather than try and find parking in Green Point. It will add another 25 odd kms to my ride. 

If they said that a HALF route MIGHT be an option, it is possible that many people would have canceled flights etc on Monday.

 

I also think that CTCT could have updated the media more than just say, ""please dont call us" 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 2:35 PM

Lets just hope that no unforeseen disaster pops up rendering the alternative, alternative route unride-able.

Jinne dude.....

 

Debate, dont just criticize other people

 

Edit: meant to say. Debate more with less sarcasm

KarlvN

Mar 5, 2015, 2:35 PM

I propose that all the moaners, whiners and whingers who deem it below themselves to ride the Argus Lite donate their entries to the pilots and fire teams who bravely fought this monster in our midst, and let these absolute hero's ride a lap of honour in the midst of the people who really love this city. Damn, I will be honoured to ride with them, even if it takes me 5 hours to finish. Maybe even give them your bikes to ride on, then you can go stand on the sidewalk and really let rip with your self vindication.

urbanroyal

Mar 5, 2015, 2:36 PM

Just heard David Bellairs say that a proper alternative route is definitely on the cards for future CTCTs given the effect on this year's race.

Cool....I'm a happy chappy..and and they better not double that entry fee...????????

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 2:36 PM

If they said that a HALF route MIGHT be an option, it is possible that many people would have canceled flights etc on Monday.

 

I also think that CTCT could have updated the media more than just say, ""please dont call us" 

fair comment. I am also in favor of a more transparent approach in future. Perhaps publish the possible alternatives and broadly what could trigger implementation of an alternative? or does that open a whole new truck load of worms?  

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 2:36 PM

..and therein lies the issue "dependant on" this denotes uncertainty. The argument was rather simply remove this uncertainly and make a call based on the facts on hand at the time. People understand its a fluid issue and things can change, all they want to know is where they stand early enough so they can also make decisions, keeping them hanging till the last minute is not good PR.

 

As G mentioned the option to ride the long route was very much still viable. Yes, dependent on, as most of the fires on the mountain are typically brought under control and put out within that time period. The elements on this occasion did not make that a reality and its therefore an unplanned, unforeseen natural disaster that has effectively shortened the route to what it is.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment