Events

Cape Town Cycle Tour will go ahead, detour route now 47km

By Matt · 944 comments

At a press conference a short while ago it was announced that the Cape Town Cycle Tour 2015 will go ahead with some significant changes to the route after Chapmans Peak drive is declared unsafe.

The route has been reduced to just 47km from the usual start in Cape Town CBD to Muizenberg and back.

ctct.jpg

CAPE TOWN CYCLE TOUR ANNOUNCES THE 38TH YEAR AS THE “SHOW YOU CARE SOLIDARITY RIDE”

Statement from David Bellairs:

It’s been an extremely worrying and tense week for Cape Town. For the last four days our beautiful Southern Peninsula, that the iconic Cape Town Cycle Tour traditionally passes through, has been on fire. It’s been devastating.

Fire fighters have worked day and night battling the flames in sweltering heat as experienced pilots fly choppers to drop buckets of water on the flames. Emergency teams, paramedics, health officials and disaster experts have gone the extra mile, saving lives and preventing homes from burning down.

It’s been very heartening to see how the public has responded to the crisis. They have rushed to bring necessities – eye drops, ice, drinks, food for the fire fighters. They have also pledged donations to buy much-needed resources. They have given much more than money – they have opened their hearts and given their humanity. Cape Town is a city of Good Samaritans – a city of heroes.

And we, at the Cycle Tour, are humbled by the overwhelming outpouring of good. We see that outpouring of good every single year at the Cycle Tour. The Cape Town Cycle Tour is a celebration of good times for the 35 000 people who participate in the event. We also know that so many people working tirelessly behind the scenes to make those good times possible.

This week we’ve seen people from all walks of life responding to the fires and we know that people of this great province don’t only come together for good times but also come together when there is a crisis and we share the concerns of the local community and join in rallying behind these brave firefighters.

For the Cycle Tour to be able to safely cater for the 35000 anticipated participants, we need to start placing infrastructure on the ground by tomorrow morning. For this to happen, a decision on the route needs to be made today. The decision we have made is unanimous and has not been taken lightly. It has involved extensive discussion and collaboration by all stakeholders including the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Enteleni and their consulting engineers in respect of Chapman’s Peak, City of Cape town Events Office, City of Cape Town Disaster Management Services, Provincial Emergency Medical Services and Cape Town Traffic in respect of Ou Kaapse Weg, MyCiti, Mediclinic and our Presenting Rights sponsors.

Having carefully assessed all available information, it has become clear that the safety of cyclists cannot be guaranteed on Chapman’s Peak and this rules out using this famous landmark for the 2015 event. This is largely as a result of the extensive fire which has destroyed vegetation responsible for retaining the mountainside above Chapman’s Peak. Furthermore, the heat has caused rocks to expand making them unstable and in some instances rock falls have occurred.

With Chapman’s Peak ruled out, our detour option of Ou Kaapse Weg returning to Cape Town via the M3 was considered. A number of key issues needed to be taken into account including access and egress to the South Peninsula by Emergency Services vehicles and local residents who are still under threat of fires raging in the area. The soot and ash covering both sides of the road on Ou Kaapse Weg present a considerable health risk to participants and this would be exacerbated by the likelihood of wind.

The idea of an out and back route via Main Road to Cape Point and back is impractical for an event of this size as road widths in certain areas between Fishhoek and Muizenberg narrow down to a width of four metres.

We understand that many visitors have travelled from far afield to participate in this iconic international bucket list cycling event. We are also keenly aware of the need to reduce the impact the event will have on traffic and other emergency services that are desperately needed elsewhere in the South Peninsula.

With this in mind, we have taken a bold decision and will be staging a vastly shortened version of our beloved Cape Town Cycle Tour in solidarity and support for those affected by the tragic fires burning on the mountains around Cape Town. The route will be a 47km circular route from its normal start at the Civic Centre to the end of the M3 and back the same way to a slightly altered finish in Green Point.

The unfortunate set of circumstances we face this week is unprecedented in 38 years of the Cape Town Cycle Tour. On Sunday cyclists won’t see pristine scenery as they make their way down the shortened route. They should see the smouldering landscape as a source of inspiration and pride because it represents the heroism of the men and women who have – very literally – put their bodies in the line of fire.

The ride remains a celebration of Cape Town and this wonderful Peninsula on the southern tip of Africa. The Cape Town Cycle Tour will go on because, as the fighting spirit of the people of Cape Town has demonstrated, nothing can take it away from us – not even fire.

Route Map

route.jpg

Related posts

Comments

Blokman

Mar 5, 2015, 1:31 PM

This is going to be like Coitus Interruptus

I've never done that race.

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 1:32 PM

The hold off in the annoucement was to see if OKW was a viable option with the fire services having the opportunity at putting it out. We all know that did not happen and the fire gained in ferocity and then went on it's real rampage through homes in both Monkey Valley and Tokia and shutting down both Boyes Drive and OKW. That essentially forced the organisers to look at what part of the route they could still ask access for and this is the 47kms we will ride with not a single vehicle to share our road space with! VIVA cycling! Thank you CTCTT

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:33 PM

Please answer my question

 

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

If they had a meeting on Monday they would have known and discussed that they dont have any other options but a shorter route.

Around the time the Jagermeister came out. 

 

"Dude.... check the mountaaain" was heard from Bellville to Noordhoek, the "Rich Whitey Stronghold of Lore"

wanderwoman

Mar 5, 2015, 1:35 PM

Joh boys - sies! Just come and enjoy what is left of the race - and if not then that's also fine.

More time for beers etc. Chill there is nothing you can do about it.

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:38 PM

The hold off in the annoucement was to see if OKW was a viable option with the fire services having the opportunity at putting it out. We all know that did not happen and the fire gained in ferocity and then went on it's real rampage through homes in both Monkey Valley and Tokia and shutting down both Boyes Drive and OKW. That essentially forced the organisers to look at what part of the route they could still ask access for and this is the 47kms we will ride with not a single vehicle to share our road space with! VIVA cycling! Thank you CTCTT

 

But earlier in the thread there were stories of smoke inhalation, ash everywhere, dangerous roads and the emergency services needing the road to what they need to do.

 

Sounds to me like Plan B and C was never an option and there was no reason to wait until Wednesday to announce the shorter route.

 

Maybe a lot more cancellations if they announced it on Monday...

GrumpyOldGuy

Mar 5, 2015, 1:38 PM

Its unfortunate, but in my opinion the organizers waited too long to make a call and left people feeling uncertain. 

 

I have just read the posted brief and its mostly full of fluff and irrelevant points. People are very forgiving if you take them into your confidence and just tell them the facts.

 

In my opinion the brief should have been sent out Monday midday giving people time to make informed decisions on wither to travel or not. People understand the situation is fluid, just tell them the facts, "Folks this is the information we have up to and at this point, and, because we understand people need to make arrangements, based on this information we have made the decision to shorten the race.We understand circumstances may change later, but in an effort to accommodate everyone we had to make a call."

 

Thats all people want to know, it gives them time to make an informed decision and removes uncertainty. I suggest this would have eliminated a lot of the animosity people feel now that they may have been forced into a track they would not have taken given the choice.  

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:38 PM

:stupid:

 

Then you are trolling as well, I am asking exactly the same questions as you

 

Huh? 

 

No - I really didn't (but I had to check anyway) - I said it takes far longer than 3 days to get the requisite approvals in place - didn't reference SANRAL at all... 

 

the 3 days part was the notice for suppliers (scaffolding, drinks, etc) to start planning thier rollouts of services and supplies to the relevant areas. A full day to plan which route to take to deliver your goods, at the minimum... 

 

Plus, I'm quite certain of the fact that SANRAL will require a LOT more than 3 days to approve a route / use of a national road.

Did not go back to check the facts so sorry that I mis-quoted you....

Shebeen

Mar 5, 2015, 1:39 PM

from the horses mouth....last night after the announcement

 

urbanroyal

Mar 5, 2015, 1:40 PM

ok so they must get a completely separate start and finish venue, and separate route, pay for the necessary approvals, closures etc. for both scenarios to get the permissions in place because a natural disaster of Epic proportions happened once in 38 years. Next year we will have the wind or extreme heat again, so factor that in as well with this new route, perhaps source an indoor venue for this... IT MAKES COMPLETE SENSE...

I don't see the problem. ..at 430 x 35000...shouldn't be a problem....the city can come aboard as well ...hell the give the minstrels a couple of mill each year ...???????????? the alternative can be advertised as well and residents informed....and nd if all goes well ..it's the traditional route ..if not ..it's the alternative....really don't see the problem...☺

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:40 PM

The hold off in the annoucement was to see if OKW was a viable option with the fire services having the opportunity at putting it out. We all know that did not happen and the fire gained in ferocity and then went on it's real rampage through homes in both Monkey Valley and Tokia and shutting down both Boyes Drive and OKW. That essentially forced the organisers to look at what part of the route they could still ask access for and this is the 47kms we will ride with not a single vehicle to share our road space with! VIVA cycling! Thank you CTCTT

people seriously underestimate the mammoth task of putting up an event catering for 35 000 participants. If it was easy, there would be a 35 000 strong funride in every major city in the world. The more I think about the variables, logistics, planning, permissions, systems, safety, etc involved in this, the more appreciative I am for having done 5 Argusses without this type of curve ball. Ok, the windy Argus prolly came close, but with this current situation it just puts my moaning that year into perspective. 14 homes were destroyed this week and many more were under serious threat. 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:42 PM

:stupid:

 

Then you are trolling as well, I am asking exactly the same questions as you

Dude you were looking for a reaction from me...we mos have history

but whatever.

 

I learned a lot from El Captain here today. And now understand why CTCT made certain decisions, so the good news is that I can tell me friends who think like I used to think, what is really up.

 

So call me stupid, slow. I had the guts to keep asking the questions until I understood  the answer. (not until I was given and answer) until I understood it.

 

And lucky for me El Captain the decency to explain it without name calling etc.

Wannabe

Mar 5, 2015, 1:43 PM

Comment removed.

Not necessary to comment any further, I see the lights has gone on.... :whistling:  :whistling:

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:43 PM

I don't see the problem. ..at 430 x 35000...shouldn't be a problem....the city can come aboard as well ...hell the give the minstrels a couple of mill each year ... the alternative can be advertised as well and residents informed....and nd if all goes well ..it's the traditional route ..if not ..it's the alternative....really don't see the problem...☺

I also don't have an issue to pay for a fully redundant route, but for many out there R800 is a lot of moola. 

Hackster

Mar 5, 2015, 1:43 PM

What's going to cause trouble on the day is that riders are going to look at conditions on Sunday and say 'looks fine to me, no fires'.

 

An accurate forecast of fire conditions couldn't be made early in the week.

 

Lets not forget that right up to Wednesday, the fire was looking like it was out of control.

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 1:44 PM

But earlier in the thread there were stories of smoke inhalation, ash everywhere, dangerous roads and the emergency services needing the road to what they need to do.

 

Sounds to me like Plan B and C was never an option and there was no reason to wait until Wednesday to announce the shorter route.

 

Maybe a lot more cancellations if they announced it on Monday...

 

But the real issues from the fire making it not possible to run across OKW only happened on Tuesday. Til then it would certainly have been noticeable but manageable. How could they have predicted that on Monday and given the early annoucement??

Wannabe

Mar 5, 2015, 1:49 PM

Hindsight is a wonderfull thing, especialy if all the facts are now available....

GrumpyOldGuy

Mar 5, 2015, 1:49 PM

But the real issues from the fire making it not possible to run across OKW only happened on Tuesday. Til then it would certainly have been noticeable but manageable. How could they have predicted that on Monday and given the early annoucement??

I think you misunderstood, the argument is the call to ride a shortened race should have been made earlier, Monday midday preferably, whatever happens later is not the issue, the decision is made and everyone can plan accordingly.

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:50 PM

from the horses mouth....last night after the announcement

 

As I suspected a lot happened from Monday morning early until Wednesday evening. 

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 1:50 PM

What's going to cause trouble on the day is that riders are going to look at conditions on Sunday and say 'looks fine to me, no fires'.

 

An accurate forecast of fire conditions couldn't be made early in the week.

 

Lets not forget that right up to Wednesday, the fire was looking like it was out of control.

 

Even if the conditions are perfect between now and next week, the effect of 4 days of raging fire will still be ongoing come Sunday and there is no way it will be safe for 35 000 people to ride through the heart of the areas the fire has unloaded its wrath.

cadenceblur

Mar 5, 2015, 1:50 PM

Been a bit busy today, so haven't had time to follow this thread.

But what will happen with the seedings post this ride? Will they use the 2014 result (for individuals who don't ride any other events) for the 2016 event?

Will this time be scrapped, I hear they're still timing the event.

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:51 PM

 

 

I think you misunderstood, the argument is the call to ride a shortened race should have been made earlier, Monday midday preferably, whatever happens later is not the issue, the decision is made and everyone can plan accordingly.

 

+ 1000

 

Waiting till Wednesday, to say what you could have said on Monday..

 

Not cool man

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 1:52 PM

I think you misunderstood, the argument is the call to ride a shortened race should have been made earlier, Monday midday preferably, whatever happens later is not the issue, the decision is made and everyone can plan accordingly.

 

Nope, no misunderstanding. Monday the option to ride the longer detour route over OKW was still on the table, dependant on whether fire services were able to contain and put out the fire. At that time there was some burning that had happened, but the real issue came through Monday evening into Tuesday and Tuesday night. At that point the route became a figment of full distance imagination. How could they have annouced this earlier?

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:53 PM

Dude you were looking for a reaction from me...we mos have history

but whatever.

 

I learned a lot from El Captain here today. And now understand why CTCT made certain decisions, so the good news is that I can tell me friends who think like I used to think, what is really up.

 

So call me stupid, slow. I had the guts to keep asking the questions until I understood  the answer. (not until I was given and answer) until I understood it.

 

And lucky for me El Captain the decency to explain it without name calling etc.

 

 

Please go check my posts again, I feel exactly the same as you.

 

I was replying to Gluhwein and to Armpies and then suddenly you tell me I am trolling

Tubehunter

Mar 5, 2015, 1:54 PM

Been a bit busy today, so haven't had time to follow this thread.

But what will happen with the seedings post this ride? Will they use the 2014 result (for individuals who don't ride any other events) for the 2016 event?

Will this time be scrapped, I hear they're still timing the event.

 

Timing will be to ensure you're an official finisher. This event will likely get all the same penalties other races of shorter distances get. It's the only way to ensure consistency across the seeding formula. Make sure you ride one of the other seeding races sometime during 2015 if you're interested in a decent start group for 2016 version.

urbanroyal

Mar 5, 2015, 1:54 PM

I also don't have an issue to pay for a fully redundant route, but for many out there R800 is a lot of moola.

Why 800...the planning and permissions etc are not gonna double the cost....that probably 50 per entry at most...that's 1.75mil just there..and the city can come aboard. ...unless PPA want to be generous and part with some cash to prevent this fiasco from happening again...☺

Add a comment

You must log in to comment