Events

Cape Town Cycle Tour will go ahead, detour route now 47km

By Matt · 944 comments

At a press conference a short while ago it was announced that the Cape Town Cycle Tour 2015 will go ahead with some significant changes to the route after Chapmans Peak drive is declared unsafe.

The route has been reduced to just 47km from the usual start in Cape Town CBD to Muizenberg and back.

ctct.jpg

CAPE TOWN CYCLE TOUR ANNOUNCES THE 38TH YEAR AS THE “SHOW YOU CARE SOLIDARITY RIDE”

Statement from David Bellairs:

It’s been an extremely worrying and tense week for Cape Town. For the last four days our beautiful Southern Peninsula, that the iconic Cape Town Cycle Tour traditionally passes through, has been on fire. It’s been devastating.

Fire fighters have worked day and night battling the flames in sweltering heat as experienced pilots fly choppers to drop buckets of water on the flames. Emergency teams, paramedics, health officials and disaster experts have gone the extra mile, saving lives and preventing homes from burning down.

It’s been very heartening to see how the public has responded to the crisis. They have rushed to bring necessities – eye drops, ice, drinks, food for the fire fighters. They have also pledged donations to buy much-needed resources. They have given much more than money – they have opened their hearts and given their humanity. Cape Town is a city of Good Samaritans – a city of heroes.

And we, at the Cycle Tour, are humbled by the overwhelming outpouring of good. We see that outpouring of good every single year at the Cycle Tour. The Cape Town Cycle Tour is a celebration of good times for the 35 000 people who participate in the event. We also know that so many people working tirelessly behind the scenes to make those good times possible.

This week we’ve seen people from all walks of life responding to the fires and we know that people of this great province don’t only come together for good times but also come together when there is a crisis and we share the concerns of the local community and join in rallying behind these brave firefighters.

For the Cycle Tour to be able to safely cater for the 35000 anticipated participants, we need to start placing infrastructure on the ground by tomorrow morning. For this to happen, a decision on the route needs to be made today. The decision we have made is unanimous and has not been taken lightly. It has involved extensive discussion and collaboration by all stakeholders including the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Enteleni and their consulting engineers in respect of Chapman’s Peak, City of Cape town Events Office, City of Cape Town Disaster Management Services, Provincial Emergency Medical Services and Cape Town Traffic in respect of Ou Kaapse Weg, MyCiti, Mediclinic and our Presenting Rights sponsors.

Having carefully assessed all available information, it has become clear that the safety of cyclists cannot be guaranteed on Chapman’s Peak and this rules out using this famous landmark for the 2015 event. This is largely as a result of the extensive fire which has destroyed vegetation responsible for retaining the mountainside above Chapman’s Peak. Furthermore, the heat has caused rocks to expand making them unstable and in some instances rock falls have occurred.

With Chapman’s Peak ruled out, our detour option of Ou Kaapse Weg returning to Cape Town via the M3 was considered. A number of key issues needed to be taken into account including access and egress to the South Peninsula by Emergency Services vehicles and local residents who are still under threat of fires raging in the area. The soot and ash covering both sides of the road on Ou Kaapse Weg present a considerable health risk to participants and this would be exacerbated by the likelihood of wind.

The idea of an out and back route via Main Road to Cape Point and back is impractical for an event of this size as road widths in certain areas between Fishhoek and Muizenberg narrow down to a width of four metres.

We understand that many visitors have travelled from far afield to participate in this iconic international bucket list cycling event. We are also keenly aware of the need to reduce the impact the event will have on traffic and other emergency services that are desperately needed elsewhere in the South Peninsula.

With this in mind, we have taken a bold decision and will be staging a vastly shortened version of our beloved Cape Town Cycle Tour in solidarity and support for those affected by the tragic fires burning on the mountains around Cape Town. The route will be a 47km circular route from its normal start at the Civic Centre to the end of the M3 and back the same way to a slightly altered finish in Green Point.

The unfortunate set of circumstances we face this week is unprecedented in 38 years of the Cape Town Cycle Tour. On Sunday cyclists won’t see pristine scenery as they make their way down the shortened route. They should see the smouldering landscape as a source of inspiration and pride because it represents the heroism of the men and women who have – very literally – put their bodies in the line of fire.

The ride remains a celebration of Cape Town and this wonderful Peninsula on the southern tip of Africa. The Cape Town Cycle Tour will go on because, as the fighting spirit of the people of Cape Town has demonstrated, nothing can take it away from us – not even fire.

Route Map

route.jpg

Related posts

Comments

mikedevill

Mar 5, 2015, 1:05 PM

does anybody know if there is a group ride on Saturday planned to go from Stellenbosch to Somerset West to Grabouw to Franschhoek to Pniel and back to Stellenbosch - 140 km 

 

I'm keen - but would prefer cycling in a group for safey

that is the 4 passes route - you go over the 4 passes very nice ride - but to long for a weekend warrior like me. enjoy it and stop for a brekkie in Franschoek.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:05 PM

Not ONCE did I say I want to ride Chappies, it is damn dangerous.

 

I knew on Monday that chances are good the original route will not be used, and the alternative route "might" also burn....if I could see it why could then not?

 

Would have been nice if David B actually said this .... that 3 days is not enough.

TBH he shouldn't have to. It's logical. Common sense, even. Plus it's what everyone has been saying on this thread for the past 36 bloody pages.

Spank

Mar 5, 2015, 1:06 PM

So I've learnt a few things in the last day or so.

 

*the Argus makes a SHEDLOAD of cash. 

*it is a piece of piss to organise. 

 

I can't wait till the keyboard experts here put on events like this soon, we are going to be spoilt for choice when it comes to options.

Give that man a Bells! :clap:

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:11 PM

You see that is the problem there.....it should not have been three days but 365...the Monday after the Argus...when they have their post mortem....they should start planning ...for ALL contingencies. ..the thought of have an alternative route in another area was never considered. ..for an event of this size...that is a f*ck up....but hey ...let's hope they have their ducks in a row come next year....☺

ok so they must get a completely separate start and finish venue, and separate route, pay for the necessary approvals, closures etc. for both scenarios to get the permissions in place because a natural disaster of Epic proportions happened once in 38 years. Next year we will have the wind or extreme heat again, so factor that in as well with this new route, perhaps source an indoor venue for this... IT MAKES COMPLETE SENSE... 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:11 PM

TBH he shouldn't have to. It's logical. Common sense, even. Plus it's what everyone has been saying on this thread for the past 36 bloody pages.

No-one has explained it like you.

 

1. The CTCT had a backup plan, route A, B, C etc.

2. Monday was to late to implement any other plan (Northen Route) etc

 

Now it makes sense, so we can ONLY flame them for not seeing that there "could" be a fire that will take out ALL the routes and backup routes once in 14-20 years.

:-) 

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:12 PM

added to that - the existing route has about 4 or 5 levels of redundancy, each larger than the one preceding it. This disaster took out ALL of them, which no reasonable person would ever expect. The approval is already granted for the roads they are now using - except for the ones affected by the fire. 

 

Get over it. 

 

Okay so Plan A B and C couldnt work as all the routes where affected by the fire.

 

Why wait though until Wednesday evening? Its not like the fire/ash etc etc would have dissappeared from Mon-Wed

 

If they made a call on Monday they would have had some time to find/arrange an alternative route.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:12 PM

Now this makes a lot of sense, thanks

 

Edit, I don't think that most people will know this info regarding permission, city and disaster management giving the OK.

 

So it is likely that they "could" have asked for another route and told NO....

Also explains, why they are using the exact route as original with a slight change in the end.

 

Thanks for the explanation without name calling and belittleling 

:-)

TBH I don't think it was ever even considered - te guys on the CTCTT know how much prep goes into something like this, and they would have seen the timeline & done the math. It was just never possible given the extreme proximity to the race itself. 

 

If there had been a month long gap, maybe. But the primary concern in that case (after getting route planning permission from the city) would have been the notice to the residents in the affected area. You can't spring something like a full day road closure on them without significant notice. It would be challenged in court and likely overturned. 

Wannabe

Mar 5, 2015, 1:12 PM

Can't believe what I'm reading here!! :cursing:

And the biggest whiners are the Capies, not even the guys who went to great expense to get here. :thumbdown:  :thumbdown:

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:15 PM

Okay so Plan A B and C couldnt work as all the routes where affected by the fire.

 

Why wait though until Wednesday evening? Its not like the fire/ash etc etc would have dissappeared from Mon-Wed

 

If they made a call on Monday they would have had some time to find/arrange an alternative route.

Nope. Not enough time. Seriously... 

 

Emergency services, public participation & notification of the closed roads, etc etc etc. Takes far longer than 3 days to set that up. 

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:17 PM

Okay so Plan A B and C couldnt work as all the routes where affected by the fire.

 

Why wait though until Wednesday evening? Its not like the fire/ash etc etc would have dissappeared from Mon-Wed

 

If they made a call on Monday they would have had some time to find/arrange an alternative route.

do you think they sat on their hands for 3 days? Don't you think there were emails, telephone conferences, etc between disaster management, the mayors office, the premier's office, the Trust, PPA and rotary or do you think they had pina coladas for 3 days and only had a sit-down on wednesday to take the easy way out? 

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:17 PM

Nope. Not enough time. Seriously... 

 

Emergency services, public participation & notification of the closed roads, etc etc etc. Takes far longer than 3 days to set that up. 

 

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

Surely somewhere someone should have said, "okes this fire is serious we need to sit and discuss some alternative plans"

 

Or lets wait till Wednesday when its waaaaaaaaaaaaay to late to do anything and then make a decision

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:19 PM

do you think they sat on their hands for 3 days? Don't you think there were emails, telephone conferences, etc between disaster management, the mayors office, the premier's office, the Trust, PPA and rotary or do you think they had pina coladas for 3 days and only had a sit-down on wednesday to take the easy way out? 

 

Glu I need you stop flexing your calves and try to have a normal discussion

 

Thanks son

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:21 PM

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

Surely somewhere someone should have said, "okes this fire is serious we need to sit and discuss some alternative plans"

 

Or lets wait till Wednesday when its waaaaaaaaaaaaay to late to do anything and then make a decision

I am sure the role players were already in discussion on Monday morning at 7am and decided to make a call at the latest possible moment, given that a re-route would not be possible as so concisely explained by the Captain. 

PJP2013

Mar 5, 2015, 1:21 PM

TBH he shouldn't have to. It's logical. Common sense, even. Plus it's what everyone has been saying on this thread for the past 36 bloody pages.

 

Sadly, common sense not that common anymore.

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:22 PM

Glu I need you stop flexing your calves and try to have a normal discussion

 

Thanks son

I just wonder what makes you assume that they sat and did diddly squat until Wednesday. 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:23 PM

ok so they must get a completely separate start and finish venue, and separate route, pay for the necessary approvals, closures etc. for both scenarios to get the permissions in place because a natural disaster of Epic proportions happened once in 38 years. Next year we will have the wind or extreme heat again, so factor that in as well with this new route, perhaps source an indoor venue for this... IT MAKES COMPLETE SENSE... 

Can I ask you ONE thing, please learn from EL Captain how NOT to be sacastic, and explain properly.

 

I did not know how long it takes to get permission from SANRAL, I tought it is some that Helen can sign off with friends over tea. So many others think the same.

 

I did not know that CTCT will NOT be able to get permission to change the route to go towards Blouberg fro example. 

 

Again I thought, it is something they can do in a sec.

 

El Captain, explained that Monday was to late to apply for anything, to make such a major change in the route. CTCT always state that the route could change, but I never knew that they have the route A, B, C, D pre-approved so if they can not use chappies they can easily change to OKW.

 

It now makes sense why they are on route they have now.

 

Most people here as very sarcastic with their replies, calling people names, and stupid etc.

Like your comment about SANRAL, saying try and get that right with SANRAL or something like that.

 

El Captain then says " SANRAL will require 3 days" and mentioned that approaval will be needed from Disaster Management etc. 

Then I could see it, even if CTCT applied on Monday to SANRAL, they would not have had the approval from DM( not that I think DM would have wanted to care about any of that on Monday as they were busy saving lives) So even if CTCT wanted to change(apply for) the route to change on Monday they would not have been able to do so.

 

So that leaves us with 3days SANRAL requires, ending Thursday, by that time CTCT has to put stuff on the ground and etc etc......

 

Now, I wrote this for the benefit of others who might think the way I was thinking. Slowbee for excample.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:24 PM

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

Surely somewhere someone should have said, "okes this fire is serious we need to sit and discuss some alternative plans"

 

Or lets wait till Wednesday when its waaaaaaaaaaaaay to late to do anything and then make a decision

 

I am sure the role players were already in discussion on Monday morning at 7am and decided to make a call at the latest possible moment, given that a re-route would not be possible as so concisely explained by the Captain. 

this...

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:25 PM

Nope. Not enough time. Seriously... 

 

Emergency services, public participation & notification of the closed roads, etc etc etc. Takes far longer than 3 days to set that up. 

He is trolling...

eddy

Mar 5, 2015, 1:26 PM

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

Surely somewhere someone should have said, "okes this fire is serious we need to sit and discuss some alternative plans"

 

 

 

 

I agree with that.

 

It is entirely reasonable that instead of managing the response to the fires, the senior Emergency services personnel should from Tuesday have been drawing up a plan to support a 35 000 rider cycle race elsewhere on the peninsula.

 

 

Wat rook julle daar in die Kaap ?

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:26 PM

He is trolling...

:stupid:

 

Then you are trolling as well, I am asking exactly the same questions as you

leaboy

Mar 5, 2015, 1:29 PM

k i'm out.

see you sunday, well those that are taking part... :whistling:

Escapee..

Mar 5, 2015, 1:29 PM

this...

 

Please answer my question

 

Okay so lets look at when the fire started and when did you guys in Cape Town realise its now a braaivleis fire?

 

If they had a meeting on Monday they would have known and discussed that they dont have any other options but a shorter route.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:29 PM

 

 

El Captain then says " SANRAL will require 3 days" and mentioned that approaval will be needed from Disaster Management etc. 

Then I could see it, even if CTCT applied on Monday to SANRAL, they would not have had the approval from DM( not that I think DM would have wanted to care about any of that on Monday as they were busy saving lives) So even if CTCT wanted to change(apply for) the route to change on Monday they would not have been able to do so.

 

So that leaves us with 3days SANRAL requires, ending Thursday, by that time CTCT has to put stuff on the ground and etc etc......

Huh? 

 

No - I really didn't (but I had to check anyway) - I said it takes far longer than 3 days to get the requisite approvals in place - didn't reference SANRAL at all... 

 

the 3 days part was the notice for suppliers (scaffolding, drinks, etc) to start planning thier rollouts of services and supplies to the relevant areas. A full day to plan which route to take to deliver your goods, at the minimum... 

 

Plus, I'm quite certain of the fact that SANRAL will require a LOT more than 3 days to approve a route / use of a national road.

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 1:30 PM

Can I ask you ONE thing, please learn from EL Captain how NOT to be sacastic, and explain properly.

 

I did not know how long it takes to get permission from SANRAL, I tought it is some that Helen can sign off with friends over tea. So many others think the same.

 

I did not know that CTCT will NOT be able to get permission to change the route to go towards Blouberg fro example. 

 

Again I thought, it is something they can do in a sec.

 

El Captain, explained that Monday was to late to apply for anything, to make such a major change in the route. CTCT always state that the route could change, but I never knew that they have the route A, B, C, D pre-approved so if they can not use chappies they can easily change to OKW.

 

It now makes sense why they are on route they have now.

 

Most people here as very sarcastic with their replies, calling people names, and stupid etc.

Like your comment about SANRAL, saying try and get that right with SANRAL or something like that.

 

El Captain then says " SANRAL will require 3 days" and mentioned that approaval will be needed from Disaster Management etc. 

Then I could see it, even if CTCT applied on Monday to SANRAL, they would not have had the approval from DM( not that I think DM would have wanted to care about any of that on Monday as they were busy saving lives) So even if CTCT wanted to change(apply for) the route to change on Monday they would not have been able to do so.

 

So that leaves us with 3days SANRAL requires, ending Thursday, by that time CTCT has to put stuff on the ground and etc etc......

 

Now, I wrote this for the benefit of others who might think the way I was thinking. Slowbee for excample.

for me its common sense that if you have complete redundancy in two entirely separate routes and start and finish venues there would be significant cost involved. Will we then pay R800 next year just so that they can have a "Boland Argus" as backup? Nevermind the other logistics of 35 000 odd people on the day. 

Perhaps the answer is half the field and double the entry, making contingency planning a bit easier and the need for a fully redundant route less of an issue, but I am over simplifying, so let this thought simmer for a while. 

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:30 PM

:stupid:

 

Then you are trolling as well, I am asking exactly the same questions as you

Well played, sir - I couldn't see the expression on your face, for once. And I don't normally miss your troll-face!

Add a comment

You must log in to comment