Events

Cape Town Cycle Tour will go ahead, detour route now 47km

By Matt · 944 comments

At a press conference a short while ago it was announced that the Cape Town Cycle Tour 2015 will go ahead with some significant changes to the route after Chapmans Peak drive is declared unsafe.

The route has been reduced to just 47km from the usual start in Cape Town CBD to Muizenberg and back.

ctct.jpg

CAPE TOWN CYCLE TOUR ANNOUNCES THE 38TH YEAR AS THE “SHOW YOU CARE SOLIDARITY RIDE”

Statement from David Bellairs:

It’s been an extremely worrying and tense week for Cape Town. For the last four days our beautiful Southern Peninsula, that the iconic Cape Town Cycle Tour traditionally passes through, has been on fire. It’s been devastating.

Fire fighters have worked day and night battling the flames in sweltering heat as experienced pilots fly choppers to drop buckets of water on the flames. Emergency teams, paramedics, health officials and disaster experts have gone the extra mile, saving lives and preventing homes from burning down.

It’s been very heartening to see how the public has responded to the crisis. They have rushed to bring necessities – eye drops, ice, drinks, food for the fire fighters. They have also pledged donations to buy much-needed resources. They have given much more than money – they have opened their hearts and given their humanity. Cape Town is a city of Good Samaritans – a city of heroes.

And we, at the Cycle Tour, are humbled by the overwhelming outpouring of good. We see that outpouring of good every single year at the Cycle Tour. The Cape Town Cycle Tour is a celebration of good times for the 35 000 people who participate in the event. We also know that so many people working tirelessly behind the scenes to make those good times possible.

This week we’ve seen people from all walks of life responding to the fires and we know that people of this great province don’t only come together for good times but also come together when there is a crisis and we share the concerns of the local community and join in rallying behind these brave firefighters.

For the Cycle Tour to be able to safely cater for the 35000 anticipated participants, we need to start placing infrastructure on the ground by tomorrow morning. For this to happen, a decision on the route needs to be made today. The decision we have made is unanimous and has not been taken lightly. It has involved extensive discussion and collaboration by all stakeholders including the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Enteleni and their consulting engineers in respect of Chapman’s Peak, City of Cape town Events Office, City of Cape Town Disaster Management Services, Provincial Emergency Medical Services and Cape Town Traffic in respect of Ou Kaapse Weg, MyCiti, Mediclinic and our Presenting Rights sponsors.

Having carefully assessed all available information, it has become clear that the safety of cyclists cannot be guaranteed on Chapman’s Peak and this rules out using this famous landmark for the 2015 event. This is largely as a result of the extensive fire which has destroyed vegetation responsible for retaining the mountainside above Chapman’s Peak. Furthermore, the heat has caused rocks to expand making them unstable and in some instances rock falls have occurred.

With Chapman’s Peak ruled out, our detour option of Ou Kaapse Weg returning to Cape Town via the M3 was considered. A number of key issues needed to be taken into account including access and egress to the South Peninsula by Emergency Services vehicles and local residents who are still under threat of fires raging in the area. The soot and ash covering both sides of the road on Ou Kaapse Weg present a considerable health risk to participants and this would be exacerbated by the likelihood of wind.

The idea of an out and back route via Main Road to Cape Point and back is impractical for an event of this size as road widths in certain areas between Fishhoek and Muizenberg narrow down to a width of four metres.

We understand that many visitors have travelled from far afield to participate in this iconic international bucket list cycling event. We are also keenly aware of the need to reduce the impact the event will have on traffic and other emergency services that are desperately needed elsewhere in the South Peninsula.

With this in mind, we have taken a bold decision and will be staging a vastly shortened version of our beloved Cape Town Cycle Tour in solidarity and support for those affected by the tragic fires burning on the mountains around Cape Town. The route will be a 47km circular route from its normal start at the Civic Centre to the end of the M3 and back the same way to a slightly altered finish in Green Point.

The unfortunate set of circumstances we face this week is unprecedented in 38 years of the Cape Town Cycle Tour. On Sunday cyclists won’t see pristine scenery as they make their way down the shortened route. They should see the smouldering landscape as a source of inspiration and pride because it represents the heroism of the men and women who have – very literally – put their bodies in the line of fire.

The ride remains a celebration of Cape Town and this wonderful Peninsula on the southern tip of Africa. The Cape Town Cycle Tour will go on because, as the fighting spirit of the people of Cape Town has demonstrated, nothing can take it away from us – not even fire.

Route Map

route.jpg

Related posts

Comments

GAP

Mar 5, 2015, 12:33 PM

When do entries open for the 109km in 2016!!!!

Pure Savage

Mar 5, 2015, 12:34 PM

When do entries open for the 109km in 2016!!!!

Sept 2015

shawn

Mar 5, 2015, 12:35 PM

All you whinging buggers have given me heartburn and a headache. I am going to the lady pro`s thread for a bit of relief.

Mo2010

Mar 5, 2015, 12:35 PM

Sept 2015

No rush, apparently lots of people wont be entering ever again.

DJR

Mar 5, 2015, 12:37 PM

When do entries open for the 109km in 2016!!!!

1st September 2015.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 12:38 PM

...how dare they #insultyoursport like this?!

bahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaahaha!!!! Thank feck I had just swallowed my coffee!

Harryn

Mar 5, 2015, 12:39 PM

I have not read most of the thread, its far too busy. But from my perspective, in response to the views expressed by @slowbee -

 

Plane ticket. Check

Accom booked. Check

Car rented. Check

Bike en route. Check

Race entry. Check

Credit card for @CWC 's stand at expo. Check

Awesome mates to enjoy 47km of fun, and a chilled weekend with. Check

 

Hello Cape Town. No brainer!

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 12:41 PM

Dude go join the Cycle Tour Trust and you give it a bash then. Clearly they are desperately in need of someone with your analytical acumen! What could they possibly be thinking, it's only been 38 times they've run it without these kinds of issues before...

This is SA and thehub, we live here only to criticize

Maniax

Mar 5, 2015, 12:41 PM

Why is a National road out of bounds?

Bloem hosts LOTS of races on the N1.

 

Kremetart has been hosting their race on the N1 for around 21 years?

N2 Natal cost.......

 

Blah Blah Blah.

 

It is not simple.  Nobody said it is.

Not is NOT complicated either.  Someone just needs to THINK. 

 

But it is "al in die rondte"....

There is no "Wrong" or "Right".

It just is.

 

Could they have planned better?  I believe they could have.  Does it matter?  No.

Will I enter again?  Never again.

 

See.....everybody happy.  :thumbup:

 

Thank you for never entering again.  It really takes a weight of our shoulders...

Balkan_Rider

Mar 5, 2015, 12:43 PM

does anybody know if there is a group ride on Saturday planned to go from Stellenbosch to Somerset West to Grabouw to Franschhoek to Pniel and back to Stellenbosch - 140 km 

 

I'm keen - but would prefer cycling in a group for safey

Rhodent

Mar 5, 2015, 12:43 PM

You want all the cyclist and everyone else to understand what had happened and be ok with the shorter but at the same time you don't want to "inconvenience" other people? SO lets just inconvenience the "cyclists" then ?

 

The OTHER "major road will actually have had LESS of an impact than th current 47km route, did you know?

Are you listening to yourself?

 

Have you read the report?

 

I tell you what - go ride chappies and let a rock fall on your head. Or ride the original alternative route and have lung issues from inhaling smoke and ash on ou kaapse weg.

 

Let's see who's inconvenienced then.

 

Really. A decision made for SAFETY reasons is now wrong because it's INCONVENIENT.

 

And secondly - I didn't dispute that there were other options. I simply stated that the organisation, infrastructure and warnings to other road users have been in place for months.

 

3 days is not sufficient time to me drastic changes!

DJR

Mar 5, 2015, 12:45 PM

This is SA and thehub, we live here only to criticize

Some do, sadly.

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 12:45 PM

it feels like groundhog day... ok genius, which start venue could host 35 000 people, and where do they finish? Remember that any national road (i.e. road that starts with an "N") is out of bounds, and also remember that between 5000 and 10 000 riders stay in Cape Town within cycling distance to the start, so it will have to be close to a station or bus stop to transport these guys too. Remember also that full road closure is required, so where ever you go, you need to inform residents, have an alternative route for people to get in and out and have safe areas for emergency services and water points. Since its all so simple, I am waiting for your proposal in this regard. 

I NEVER said to move it.

 

I am saying that you can easily lay out a 110-120 km flat route from current start to north. Lots of options to do do full closure and still residents full access to their homes, as it was said here it requires "thought"

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 12:47 PM

Are you listening to yourself?

 

Have you read the report?

 

I tell you what - go ride chappies and let a rock fall on your head. Or ride the original alternative route and have lung issues from inhaling smoke and ash on ou kaapse weg.

 

Let's see who's inconvenienced then.

 

Really. A decision made for SAFETY reasons is now wrong because it's INCONVENIENT.

 

And secondly - I didn't dispute that there were other options. I simply stated that the organisation, infrastructure and warnings to other road users have been in place for months.

 

3 days is not sufficient time to me drastic changes!

Not ONCE did I say I want to ride Chappies, it is damn dangerous.

 

I knew on Monday that chances are good the original route will not be used, and the alternative route "might" also burn....if I could see it why could then not?

 

Would have been nice if David B actually said this .... that 3 days is not enough.

GAP

Mar 5, 2015, 12:51 PM

Sept 2015

I'll try gain, just a extra year of training in the legs!!!

Shebeen

Mar 5, 2015, 12:54 PM

So I've learnt a few things in the last day or so.

 

*the Argus makes a SHEDLOAD of cash. 

*it is a piece of piss to organise. 

 

I can't wait till the keyboard experts here put on events like this soon, we are going to be spoilt for choice when it comes to options.

urbanroyal

Mar 5, 2015, 12:56 PM

because the minute a road starts with an "N" you need to deal with Sanral. Do that in 3 days and have approval for the safety officer of the event by Wednesday evening...

You see that is the problem there.....it should not have been three days but 365...the Monday after the Argus...when they have their post mortem....they should start planning ...for ALL contingencies. ..the thought of have an alternative route in another area was never considered. ..for an event of this size...that is a f*ck up....but hey ...let's hope they have their ducks in a row come next year....☺

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 12:56 PM

Some do, sadly.

Yea, I have an opinion. I am allowed to say that I don't agree with something.

 

I also like to voice my opinion when I think something "could" have been done better. 

 

Some people respond by saying this is moaning..... 

Others will say that you need to do if it you can do it better.

 

The way I see it is.

 

I go to restaurant and the food is not lekka

 

I tell the staff, and they do something about it.

It would not really help if the Chef said, "well you do it then"

 

So we are allowed to bitch about the food but not the CTCT?

Rhodent

Mar 5, 2015, 12:57 PM

Can you not see that the amount of planning is not the problem.

 

The laying out of a route north is not the problem.

 

The problem is simple. There is not enough time to warn the road users in cspe town that a major national road will be out of commission come Saturday night. As I have mentioned, the current road closures have been broadcast and displayed since January.

 

Further to which, the fire burnt 4500 hectares. Do you know how big that is? 2000 odd of those burnt on Tuesday and Wednesday. The time crunch just makes other options unreasonable.

 

I'm not going to argue common sense any more.

 

I hope those riding have an awesome day out and make the most of it.

 

And I hope those reacting emotionally about this will calm down, and with the benefit of hindsight realise that their reactions were unjustified and their reasoning irrational.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 12:57 PM

Not ONCE did I say I want to ride Chappies, it is damn dangerous.

 

I knew on Monday that chances are good the original route will not be used, and the alternative route "might" also burn....if I could see it why could then not?

 

Would have been nice if David B actually said this .... that 3 days is not enough.

Quite simply, because it takes FAR longer to get the requisite permissions in place than just 3 days. They MUST get the infrastructure in place from today. That implies that a final approval for the new route needs to be granted by Tuesday in order to provide sufficient lead time for the logistics of getting the suppliers of the equipment and scaffolding and drinks / food etc to roll-out given the "new route" that takes them north.

 

Bottom line is that this was an unforeseen natural disaster (regardless of how it started, it morphed into a disaster) that is taxing our emergency services - from which the tour needs approval for any new route, and support should anything go wrong. I'm not in event management and yet I understand that. It's logical. 

 

Hence - a totally different route was never an option. Never. The city wouldn't have approved it given the pressure our emergency services are under, and the complete lack of notice that the affected public would have had in the new revised route's vicinity.

 

To claim that the organiser is copping out is outrageously immature and highly ignorant given the requirements of an event of this size. 

GLuvsMtb

Mar 5, 2015, 12:58 PM

I NEVER said to move it.

 

I am saying that you can easily lay out a 110-120 km flat route from current start to north. Lots of options to do do full closure and still residents full access to their homes, as it was said here it requires "thought"

ok next question... how do you get the safety officer to sign off on a new route in 3 days, even if you get Sanral to play ball with such short notice? 

Shebeen

Mar 5, 2015, 12:59 PM

Not ONCE did I say I want to ride Chappies, it is damn dangerous.

 

I knew on Monday that chances are good the original route will not be used, and the alternative route "might" also burn....if I could see it why could then not?

 

Would have been nice if David B actually said this .... that 3 days is not enough.

it would be quite profitable for you to use your powers in predicting horseracing results.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 5, 2015, 1:02 PM

added to that - the existing route has about 4 or 5 levels of redundancy, each larger than the one preceding it. This disaster took out ALL of them, which no reasonable person would ever expect. The approval is already granted for the roads they are now using - except for the ones affected by the fire. 

 

Get over it. 

Guest Smimby

Mar 5, 2015, 1:02 PM

Quite simply, because it takes FAR longer to get the requisite permissions in place than just 3 days. They MUST get the infrastructure in place from today. That implies that a final approval for the new route needs to be granted by Tuesday in order to provide sufficient lead time for the logistics of getting the suppliers of the equipment and scaffolding and drinks / food etc to roll-out given the "new route" that takes them north.

 

Bottom line is that this was an unforeseen natural disaster (regardless of how it started, it morphed into a disaster) that is taxing our emergency services - from which the tour needs approval for any new route, and support should anything go wrong. I'm not in event management and yet I understand that. It's logical. 

 

Hence - a totally different route was never an option. Never. The city wouldn't have approved it given the pressure our emergency services are under, and the complete lack of notice that the affected public would have had in the new revised route's vicinity.

 

To claim that the organiser is copping out is outrageously immature and highly ignorant given the requirements of an event of this size. 

Now this makes a lot of sense, thanks

 

Edit, I don't think that most people will know this info regarding permission, city and disaster management giving the OK.

 

So it is likely that they "could" have asked for another route and told NO....

Also explains, why they are using the exact route as original with a slight change in the end.

 

Thanks for the explanation without name calling and belittleling 

:-)

mikedevill

Mar 5, 2015, 1:02 PM

Hi Guys, my 1st Argus so I am very disappointed - but it is what it is. It is not the race organizers or the City of Cape Towns fault. I will be lining up on Sunday with my poppie.

 

I can only hope for the following : ( I know I will be blasted by some so you can write what you like - i wont respond )

 

1. That the race organizers in future will have a contingency plan/ alternative route as back-up that does not involve  the ride around the mountain. If this ever happen again (God forbid) on this scale and none of the routes are accessible  around the mountain that they can just make the decision to move it to Stellenbosch for example and all the permissions etc is in place. - A permanent back-up route away from Cape town.

 

2. I hope this event count as a seeding event and the weighting is allot - i don't see why the moaners and guys who now don't want to support it must get preferential seeding next year before the "true supporters" of the race. Let them start behind the TRUE SUPPORTERS..

 

3. I hope everyone will stay in their respective starting groups - if every one drops back ( lets face it - it is not a race anymore but a funride/supporters ride ) the field will be very heavily congested. If you take 35000 bicycles and line them up front wheel to back wheel - that is over 50 km off bikes - longer than the race itself. The 1st guy will be over the finish line and the last one still 5 km from the start. JA-JA I know we all don't ride in one straight line and on the day we will be riding next to each other, but still - we cant all start at the same time - it will be chaos and will just cause accidents.

 

One good thing is I will have the best time for the Argus in our office and my record of sub 3 will stand for along time.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment