Events

Adverse Analytical Finding – in-competition test

By Press Office · 239 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that veteran cyclist Hendrik Anderson (licence number: 14407) returned an adverse analytical finding in an in-competition test conducted by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) on 25 October 2013 at the Cape Pioneer MTB event.

The analytical report confirmed the presence of the stimulant Phentermine in Hendrik Anderson’s urine sample. Following the hearing which was conducted by an Independent Tribunal on 29 May 2014, Mr. Anderson was found guilty and has received a two year ban from all sport effective from 28 January 2014 to 27 January 2016. Mr. Anderson has the right to appeal the decision.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process and respects the outcome. Cycling SA further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness programmes and extensive testing.

Comments

rouxtjie

Jul 17, 2014, 10:53 AM

I dunno...I recall reading somewhere sometime long ago.... that ONE of the purposes of drug testing was to protect and ensure the good health of athletes... the performance enhancing ideal has overshadowed the healthy ideal

It shouldn't be......the return on investment is really stupid if health risks is ONE of their functions / purposes ....R5000 test(nevermind running costs of the anti-doping show) to tell someone that steroids are bad for them when they knew that upfront....makes no sense. There are greater evils ito health risks for the man on the street.

 

Use all your resources where it matters.

rouxtjie

Jul 17, 2014, 10:55 AM

Possibly at the point of greatest return? Ie where they are more likely to catch a cheater ... so, it would make sense to test in the pack - or as Dangle once put it "37 year old C-batch riders" :D

Exactly the point....why are they measured by how many positives they find....no matter the candidate. Their KPI should be how frequently they test top contenders / positions at races.

fandacious

Jul 17, 2014, 10:56 AM

The Pro's here are not been tested much... none of the Mtb'ers in this country are even on the bio-passport. They don't have the funds. So all we are saying is rather focus the money we do have where it matters. If someone is doping at the Cape Pioneer to come 365th - I couldn't care less. That is entirely his problem...

 

I've heard that andrew neethling is on biopassport. I know kevin evans is on bio passport

Frosty

Jul 17, 2014, 11:00 AM

Why do they only test MTB Vets and not road as well?

I can't speak for the other races, as I'm not involved, but SAIDS were at this year's Carnival City Macsteel National Classic. There was a request for 6 cyclists to tested, split over Elite and Vets.

 

There were specific names on the list (Vets), as well as a request for riders based on their finishing placings (Elites)

 

The prize giving was delayed because some of the prize winners were busy with their in-competition testing.

Andrew Steer

Jul 17, 2014, 11:04 AM

Exactly the point....why are they measured by how many positives they find....no matter the candidate. Their KPI should be how frequently they test top contenders / positions at races.

Eish... just had an insight into this all.

 

Who do SAIDS get their money from? Government!

 

Hey Khalid, you not getting positive's anymore - we going to cut your budget in haaf... the sport is clean!

Hip hip hoorah, I can get another Mazedes Bends

 

:cursing:

jcza

Jul 17, 2014, 11:04 AM

The Pro's here are not been tested much... none of the Mtb'ers in this country are even on the bio-passport. They don't have the funds. So all we are saying is rather focus the money we do have where it matters. If someone is doping at the Cape Pioneer to come 365th - I couldn't care less. That is entirely his problem...

I think the top guys are on the passport but not the whereabouts program

Falco

Jul 17, 2014, 11:10 AM

Testing midpack riders, oldies and funriders is just plain stupid. I fall in the midpack category, don't read the label of every product I consume, and don't intend to do so in the future.

 

If any race official wants a piss test, he can have it, and I reckon there's a good chance I will test positive from time to time ~ not because I'm trying to cheat or move from finishing in place 300 to place 290, but because I am a normal (non pro) cyclist who eats and drinks whatever he likes.

SwissVan

Jul 17, 2014, 11:10 AM

Its not only about cheating......from WADA's anti doping codepost-182-0-30136600-1405595229_thumb.png post-182-0-90860700-1405595253_thumb.png post-182-0-47993200-1405595272_thumb.png

Andrew Steer

Jul 17, 2014, 11:11 AM

I think the top guys are on the passport but not the whereabouts program

My apologies, you are quite correct... getting muddled up here :blush:

Anyways, bottom line, not enough testing on the pro's and tests being used on non-competitive cyclists is a complete farce. :thumbup:

Tumbleweed

Jul 17, 2014, 11:14 AM

Is the dope testing for "health reasons" point not maybe being confused with the cautionary suspensions handed to rider with high haemacrit levels in the EPO era when there was no test?

Pants Boy

Jul 17, 2014, 11:17 AM

Anyways, bottom line, not enough testing on the pro's

Yes.

d tests being used on non-competitive cyclists is a complete farce. :thumbup:

No

 

I also think that testing is ridiculous - I mean I'm on two meds for high blood pressure, and both of them are banned. As well as most cold meds ... but I know that, because I actually read the rules

 

:D*gasp shock horror*

Underachiever

Jul 17, 2014, 11:17 AM

Testing midpack riders, oldies and funriders is just plain stupid. I fall in the midpack category, don't read the label of every product I consume, and don't intend to do so in the future.

 

If any race official wants a piss test, he can have it, and I reckon there's a good chance I will test positive from time to time ~ not because I'm trying to cheat or move from finishing in place 300 to place 290, but because I am a normal (non pro) cyclist who eats and drinks whatever he likes.

 

Snap!!

 

So I've entered for the CP..... So I stand the off chase of getting tested...... And the off chance of being positive.... AND then being labelled a cheat.

 

Maybe I can escape being burnt at the stake.

 

Which means that I can return to being a fun rider at the age of 50. Eish!!!

Frosty

Jul 17, 2014, 11:19 AM

Testing midpack riders, oldies and funriders is just plain stupid. I fall in the midpack category, don't read the label of every product I consume, and don't intend to do so in the future.

 

If any race official wants a piss test, he can have it, and I reckon there's a good chance I will test positive from time to time ~ not because I'm trying to cheat or move from finishing in place 300 to place 290, but because I am a normal (non pro) cyclist who eats and drinks whatever he likes.

Ditto on the underlined bit.

 

Even if I read the label, I don't know what half the s*** is that that goes into it. And I'm talking about day to day stuff - not the miracle weight loss, strength gaining, placebo-effect stuff on the market.

Underachiever

Jul 17, 2014, 11:22 AM

I also think that testing is ridiculous - I mean I'm on two meds for high blood pressure, and both of them are banned. As well as most cold meds ... but I know that, because I actually read the rules

 

:D*gasp shock horror*

 

An early confession? Good for you! :whistling:

Pants Boy

Jul 17, 2014, 11:25 AM

An early confession? Good for you!

TUE - a bitch to get, but with proper diagnosis it's not difficult. I've got one for the first med, waiting and waiting and waiting about the second one, which was added two months ago.

Wyatt Earp

Jul 17, 2014, 11:26 AM

 

 

Shame really.

 

I agree with everything and yes it's a shame, but what if they catch a guy who took some pilletjie that his dietician or doctor said is OK for him to use and he takes it to lose weight and better his health, he has no intention to dope, but all intention to live a healthier life.

People have stomach bypasses, have ingrown nails removed, get classes and contact lenses, every industry has it's challenges, strippers get bigger plastic titties, golfers go for elbow operations or take joint supplements, all of this could be considered an "unfair advantage"

 

You said it best, and that is the crux of it.

 

"So to take away the ego from the Vet/Master/Funrider is futile but to take away the $$/contract from the pro and then they'll start cleaning up the sport"

 

That my friend, is a very profound and good statement :thumbup:

Andrew Steer

Jul 17, 2014, 11:31 AM

TUE - a bitch to get, but with proper diagnosis it's not difficult. I've got one for the first med, waiting and waiting and waiting about the second one, which was added two months ago.

Doper :devil:
SwissVan

Jul 17, 2014, 11:40 AM

Nope Tumbles not being confused

(Sorry my quote function is not working at the moment.)

 

I believe the health angle is just one if the aspects when it comes to testing, a lot of stuff out there that is bad for you and gets abused by some just so they can continue to take part and not just to improve performance.

Danger Dassie

Jul 17, 2014, 11:40 AM

Imho there's a lot of prescription and even over the counter medication that form part of treating a number of bona fide medical conditions/illnesses.

 

Dope testing and TUE procedures should really be focussed on properly categorised racing classes with a full uci/racing licence, even if it's just a day licence. Not so much on a 'cyclosport' or general licence, this isn't where the doping gains are an issue at all. Especially given the tight funding.

CSA/SAIDS could also provide a bit more context than simply stating a tribunal was carried out by an independant panel.

 

That aside, they generally do a good job considering the resources available and for the most part it's more than easy enough to check up on your medication.

Theres a useful app available, which can be installed on your phone - http://www.drugfreesport.org.za/medication-check-4/

Which my meds, Coryx is listed for "banned in competition" so now that had been turfed from the medicine cabinet.

 

With SA Champs at Thaba Trails coming up I decided to not race because of being sick, the meds and still having a head full of snot and what not. Can't afford for manflu to end of in my chest, plus I don't make a living from racing. Farkit, I barely have enough to training to get around a course looking fully composed!

Plentipotential

Jul 17, 2014, 11:44 AM

Personally i wish they would have such a strong stance on some of the other sports...the way substances are being abused in rugby from a schoolboy level is scary!

 

Exactly. If you dropped a match into the urinal in a Super Rugby teams change room you'd get a more spectacular fireworks display than they have at the end of the final game!

Tumbleweed

Jul 17, 2014, 11:45 AM

Nope Tumbles not being confused

(Sorry my quote function is not working at the moment.)

 

I believe the health angle is just one if the aspects when it comes to testing, a lot of stuff out there that is bad for you and gets abused by some just so they can continue to take part and not just to improve performance.

 

Ja, I saw you post after I posted. But is there not maybe some connection between? EPO deaths made the authorities get a bit more serious about things.

ChUkKy

Jul 17, 2014, 11:45 AM

Testing midpack riders, oldies and funriders is just plain stupid. I fall in the midpack category, don't read the label of every product I consume, and don't intend to do so in the future.

 

If any race official wants a piss test, he can have it, and I reckon there's a good chance I will test positive from time to time ~ not because I'm trying to cheat or move from finishing in place 300 to place 290, but because I am a normal (non pro) cyclist who eats and drinks whatever he likes.

 

Agreed, if he wants me to piss, he can have the cup with piss in as well as on it.

Paulst12

Jul 17, 2014, 11:48 AM

I find it amazing how many people try to condone the use of banned supplements for any rider regardless of whom they are. It’s the middle of the pack guys who are most at risk of the adverse effects of drugs. Imagine the stress on your heart if you are overweight and at 100% of your HR max? Heart attack waiting to happen!!

 

For all riders regardless of who you are, testing is to stop you from cheating, and for your own health benefits.

Wyatt Earp

Jul 17, 2014, 11:51 AM

Have we determined who Hendrik is yet ?

I looked on the TDF list and then moved on to The Epic podiums list and from there to the national marathons and series, also on CTP results I don't see him near the top step.

So who is this Frankenstein and why was he tested ?

Spinnekop

Jul 17, 2014, 11:54 AM

Agreed, if he wants me to piss, he can have the cup with piss in as well as on it.

 

Cock up is YOU as individual handle that cup from start to finish....even when you have to devide it into "A" and "B" sample bottles, YOU do it....not the guy that tests....he just watch.....

Add a comment

You must log in to comment