Events

Two Riders Out Of Absa Cape Epic Due To Doping

By Press Office · 99 comments

Two South African mountain bikers are out of the Absa Cape Epic after failing anti-doping tests. One of the riders has been provisionally suspended by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) and in the meantime is not eligible to take part in any races sanctioned by the International Cycling Union (UCI) – including the Cape Epic. His case is currently being reviewed by SAIDS.

ccs-2-0-35939500-1394805806.jpg

SAIDS confirmed this week that the second rider was given a three-month suspension for what Cycling South Africa described last year as an “adverse analytical finding in an in-competition test” in May, 2013.

SAIDS has not yet released the names of the riders, but neither of them are professionals.

Last year the Cape Epic became the first race in world cycling to apply a “zero tolerance” approach to doping by imposing a life ban on any rider found guilty of illegal use of performance-enhancing drugs. The ban applies to riders who have been sanctioned for an offence taking place after January 1, 2013.

Both riders have been notified by the Cape Epic that they will not be allowed to take up their 2014 Cape Epic entries.

“I don’t care whether a rider has been banned for three months or three years, if you cheat then we don’t have time for you – even if you are not earning a living from cycling, as is the case with these riders,” said Cape Epic founder Kevin Vermaak. “This is a new era in cycling, things are changing and I don’t want to entertain anybody who still feels the need to dope.”

When the Epic’s “zero tolerance” approach was announced in December 2012, Vermaak explained that: “We’ve chosen not to apply this retrospectively because we believe that would be naive. Cycling has a dark past. Many riders from this previous era have rediscovered the joy of cycling as mountain bikers and participate in the Absa Cape Epic as their expression of riding clean.

“Previous offenders, who have served their suspension term, may ride future Absa Cape Epics. We want to be part of the new era of cleaner cycling, and therefore only future offenders will receive the lifetime bans,” he said at the time.

Besides the Epic’s zero tolerance initiative, the International Cycling Union (UCI) has launched an ambitious independent commission to investigate cycling’s doping past. This will include allegations of mismanagement of anti-doping cases by the governing body, the UCI.

The commission was a key element in the manifesto of Brian Cookson, the former British Cycling head who was elected UCI president in late September. Within hours of taking office Cookson had sent investigators to the UCI’s Swiss offices to secure computers and documents for the commission.

SAIDS and local cycling authorities have in recent years developed “biological passports” for cyclists, which screen blood and urine tests over a period of time to check for unusual activity. This has widely been hailed as an effective way of curbing the use of drugs in sport.

Related posts

Comments

Bat

Mar 14, 2014, 8:47 PM

So "SwissVan" when were you appointed the official health police inforser seeing that now no rider with suspected healh issues are even allowed to participate in rides. So apart from asking riders to be tested for performance boosters, we are now also going to do test for being over weight, under weight, if you had a burger or beer the night before, or heaven forbid, a smoke!

Maybe you and KV just want to make a name for yourselfs?

Tankman

Mar 15, 2014, 5:03 AM

The aritcle said the one guy tested positive in May 2013 ... when did they receive this ban from the Epic, a week before the start?

 

Bloody outrageous!

 

Ag well, that just bumbped us up two places!

Frosty

Mar 15, 2014, 5:34 AM

I don't see Brandon Stewart's name being tossed around on the hub, despite him losing his appeal against using testosterone - he gets paid to ride.

 

According to the 2012/13 SAID annual report, there was a mountain biker tested on 18 March 2013 but it still shows as an OPEN status.

Tankman

Mar 15, 2014, 6:29 AM

The chances of these two being middle of the pack fun riders are pretty slim.

 

How often does funriders get tested? Never!! Ok except if you look as pumped up as Mtbbaiskelist. ;)

 

My guess would be that this has to be someone good enough to be in contention for some category local ... Elite, Sub Vet, Vet or Master.

ScottCM

Mar 15, 2014, 7:04 AM

name & shame, Band for life!!

CAAD4

Mar 15, 2014, 7:35 AM

name & shame, Band for life!!

 

Yeah they may be the next big Boy Band...

Tankman

Mar 15, 2014, 7:59 AM

I don't see Brandon Stewart's name being tossed around on the hub, despite him losing his appeal against using testosterone - he gets paid to ride.

 

 

 

Not from what I heard, he doesnt get paid anymore.

 

He withdrew himself from the team and is no longer a licenced rider.

 

(Disclaimer: I have no facts to back this up, 100% hearsay)

 

If you dont ride for a team, dont get paid and dont have a licence, you are like the rest of us, for all intended purposes, a funrider.

 

 

 

Cippo

Mar 15, 2014, 8:21 AM

If they are found guilty, Epic has a policy that you will never again be allowed to ride Epic. Am I right in my understanding?

NotSoBigBen

Mar 15, 2014, 8:23 AM

 

 

Not from what I heard, he doesnt get paid anymore.

 

He withdrew himself from the team and is no longer a licenced rider.

 

(Disclaimer: I have no facts to back this up, 100% hearsay)

 

If you dont ride for a team, dont get paid and dont have a licence, you are like the rest of us, for all intended purposes, a funrider.

 

 

He 'owns' that team as far as I was aware ....

 

 

 

NotSoBigBen

Mar 15, 2014, 8:24 AM

If they are found guilty, Epic has a policy that you will never again be allowed to ride Epic. Am I right in my understanding?

 

 

Yip, lifetime ban ....

 

 

Eugene Oppelt

Mar 15, 2014, 8:30 AM

 

 

 

Yip, lifetime ban ....

 

The only race in the world that dictates these conditions.

Pretty cool.

FrankG

Mar 15, 2014, 8:41 AM

They should both be forced to still do the Epic, but without saddles.

 

Edit: and wear a top that says: "I dope and I"m a cheat"

 

That is punishment.

Eugene Oppelt

Mar 15, 2014, 8:44 AM

Wonder when the veil of anonymity will be lifted?

After sample B have been tested?

Shebeen

Mar 15, 2014, 8:54 AM

I can see some wives outing their husbands. A life ban from epic could save marriages!

Tankman

Mar 15, 2014, 10:41 AM

If they are found guilty, Epic has a policy that you will never again be allowed to ride Epic. Am I right in my understanding?

 

The way I understood it, if you are caught cheating in the Epic, then a lifetime ban for the Epic would apply.

 

If you are serving a 2 year ban or whatever the case might be, then you obviously wont be able to ride the Epic during that time.

 

So if the ex dopers like David Millar, Alexander Vinokourov, Hoffman, Ullrich etc ... that served their bans, they would not be allowed to do the Epic because they doped somewhere in their career???

 

A life time ban for any doper?

 

That does not sound right

 

Excluding Lance obviously, he has been banned from cycling altogether.

Cippo

Mar 15, 2014, 10:59 AM

@ Tankman, the way I understood from the statement made on a cycling show at the time is that anyone guilty of doping after the rule was implemented is a ban from event irrespective if it was in Epic. I stand under correction but it was at the time of David George's case.

Cippo

Mar 15, 2014, 11:04 AM

From Epic website,

http://www.cape-epic.com/involve/organisation/zero-tolerance-policy

 

Any athlete (professional or amateur) sanctioned by their federation or national anti-doping authority (NADA) for use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) after 1 January 2013, whether at another event or out of competition, will be banned for life from participating in the Absa Cape Epic. Not only will the person not be allowed to participate (as an amateur rider or UCI- licensed elite), but the individual will also be banned from being involved on any level including as a team manager.

 

 

Iwan Kemp

Mar 15, 2014, 11:21 AM

From Epic website,

http://www.cape-epic...olerance-policy

 

Any athlete (professional or amateur) sanctioned by their federation or national anti-doping authority (NADA) for use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) after 1 January 2013, whether at another event or out of competition, will be banned for life from participating in the Absa Cape Epic. Not only will the person not be allowed to participate (as an amateur rider or UCI- licensed elite), but the individual will also be banned from being involved on any level including as a team manager.

 

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Iwan Kemp

Mar 15, 2014, 11:29 AM

So "SwissVan" when were you appointed the official health police inforser seeing that now no rider with suspected healh issues are even allowed to participate in rides. So apart from asking riders to be tested for performance boosters, we are now also going to do test for being over weight, under weight, if you had a burger or beer the night before, or heaven forbid, a smoke!

Maybe you and KV just want to make a name for yourselfs?

 

"Bat",

 

Quite a reaction there (I'm assuming due to drugs kicking in) with some wild assumptions. I didn't read that in Swiss' post or tone and I couldn't agree more with him and KV. It's a pity there aren't more events who take the same stance as the Epic.

Eugene Oppelt

Mar 15, 2014, 11:30 AM

So "SwissVan" when were you appointed the official health police inforser seeing that now no rider with suspected healh issues are even allowed to participate in rides. So apart from asking riders to be tested for performance boosters...

Maybe you and KV just want to make a name for yourselfs?

 

Wtf

andydude

Mar 15, 2014, 11:50 AM

Easy to say ban them for life, but I would guess most funriders have 'doped' somewhere in the last few months leading up to the Epic by way of medicine and/or supplements etc.

 

I'm just highlighting the practical side although I'm completely against doping.

Spark

Mar 15, 2014, 2:34 PM

Bet they are from CT.

Rapunzel

Mar 15, 2014, 3:34 PM

Maybe if testing is not limited to podium finishers then run of the mill riders will be a bit more careful about what they're putting in their systems.

As for intentionally taking performance enhancers: if you're doping for a top 3 finish or a top 300 finish - it still makes you a cheat.

Bat

Mar 15, 2014, 6:49 PM

 

 

"Bat",

 

Quite a reaction there (I'm assuming due to drugs kicking in) with some wild assumptions. I didn't read that in Swiss' post or tone and I couldn't agree more with him and KV. It's a pity there aren't more events who take the same stance as the Epic.

 

Well I actually don't give a dam what you think. However you made me go and read SwissVan's post again, and yes maybe I did not read it correctly. Here I am referring to a nanny society where we are constantly being told how and what to do with regards to our health.

 

I am against doping more specifically pro's or people doing races for recognition or money. If a tale ender want to stuff their life up or cheat just to beat their friend, then they must do so, and hopefully one day they will be found out and be put under the spotlight by those they betrayed. So to "SwissVan" I apologies, and to KV, accept my Epic entry and I might be more positive about you too.

GoLefty!!

Mar 15, 2014, 7:29 PM

that would be double standards wouldn't it and then the Pro's would be able to contest their case in court that a amatuer gets off but they don't.

Whether you're cheating your employer, sponsor, wife or best pal you're cheating.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment