Events

Tokai and Silvermine to remain closed to the public

By Press Office · 762 comments

In the interest of public safety, as well as for the protection of the environmental integrity of the Silvermine and Tokai sections of Table Mountain National Park (TMNP), park management decided that these two areas will remain closed to the public until further notice.

TMNP management understands that users are eager to access these areas, however they remain very sensitive and unsafe, and public use of these areas are off limits due to:

  • Smouldering and burning vegetation still needs to be extinguished and flare ups will occur as stumps and roots burn.
  • Standing trees that have been burnt or damaged by the fire are extremely dangerous as they continue to come down in the area.
  • Recently burnt veld (as well as adjacent areas) is hazardous as the fire will have burnt roots underground and foot falls may cause serious injuries.
  • Unstable slopes may result in rock falls
  • Winds and rain may exacerbate the danger with respect to falling trees, branches, rock falls and mudslides
  • Hazardous clear-felling operations of the burnt plantation trees are underway by Cape Pine
  • Disturbance to surviving animals
  • Burnt areas are sensitive as windblown seeds can be damaged and the first emerging plants can be killed by accidental trampling
  • Disturbance to sensitive erodible soils

The closure of the burnt areas will be continually assessed and reopening will only be considered once all safety and environmental issues have been addressed. For some areas this may take between six to twenty four months.

TMNP management and staff would like to assure the public that their focus is to secure the areas for the public’s safety and to as quickly as possible rehabilitate the affected sites for future use.

Please assist us by being patient and please remain out of all burnt areas while mother nature heals herself.

Comments

DJR

Apr 1, 2015, 10:27 AM

...............Look at Cape Nature and Jonkers - partially opened. ..............

The main difference between Jonkershoek and Tokai, is that Tokai is in the Table Mountain National Park, one of the Natural Wonders of the World with a bio-diverse flora count in the stratosphere. The management criteria differs vastly from that of Jonkershoek, which is managed as a forestry / logging area. No matter who is in charge, the above will not change.

DJR

Apr 1, 2015, 10:28 AM

This April fool is too close to reality  :ph34r:

Sorry :blush:

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Apr 1, 2015, 10:28 AM

The main difference between Jonkershoek and Tokai, is that Tokai is in the Table Mountain National Park, one of the Natural Wonders of the World with a bio-diverse flora count in the stratosphere. The management criteria differs vastly from that of Jonkershoek, which is managed as a forestry / logging area. No matter who is in charge, the above will not change.

*red data list species of fynbos*

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Apr 1, 2015, 10:29 AM

*only surviving seed bank of it's kind*

Capricorn

Apr 1, 2015, 11:03 AM

*only surviving seed bank of it's kind*

 

one more wrinkle in the tinfoil hat theory of mine that the firebug is a conservation wackjob.

Headshot

Apr 1, 2015, 11:03 AM

*only surviving seed bank of it's kind*

Isnt it the case that there is an old seed bed there dating back to before the forestry activity but that the same species are probably alive and well all over the rest of the mountain where no logging has taken place? Some of the slopes have already been deforested for some time but I have  not seen reports of any red data species or anything new coming up there. I must go through my copies of veld and Flora or perhaps contact Bot Soc...

 

Fact is that there is a bias against bikes at TMNP that as far as I can see has no basis in science. When i queried this all I got was a blank stare, if emails can stare. So they are not even prepared to justify their own policy. Thats never a good thing for building good relationships with the people whose respect you demand.

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Apr 1, 2015, 11:05 AM

one more wrinkle in the tinfoil hat theory of mine that the firebug is a conservation wackjob.

we should hold a tinfoil party... 

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 11:12 AM

Ok, so here's where we get a bit sensitive.. pun intended.

 

There was someone who was not satisfied with the burn protocol of Table Mountain National Park so sought his confirmation from a prolific and sometimes rebellious in character scientist. This guy walked around showing anyone interested the email its contents to prove his point - Valid email or not, that's not my point.

 

So skip ahead to the fire and the timeframe we all rebuke as non-sensical, especially when compared to other areas.

 

The fires were still burning when a low-level report surfaced claiming the area would need 18-24 months in rehab, requiring Tokai to be closed to public access for the duration. It doesn't take a rocket-scientist to work out that Table Mountain National Park is honouring the timeframe of this report, as it is deemed best by the man leading the project for the conservation of the area. I doubt Table Mountain National Park are forced into this timeframe either but considering the opportunity around closure for the pine removal, 18mnths may well be an accurate stab.

 

With the pines all being extracted in one year, the wide scale fire now lessens the burden of an ecoburn and Table Mountain National Park every year being critised by the public and others, around their ineptitude to conduct controlled fires.

 

Oddly, the guy backing the email is now also in the boat questioning why the timeframe is required, showing yet again that there are two sides to everything we wish for.

Capricorn

Apr 1, 2015, 11:22 AM

you have got to be sh#Ting me Deon.....

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 11:22 AM

Isnt it the case that there is an old seed bed there dating back to before the forestry activity but that the same species are probably alive and well all over the rest of the mountain where no logging has taken place? Some of the slopes have already been deforested for some time but I have  not seen reports of any red data species or anything new coming up there. I must go through my copies of veld and Flora or perhaps contact Bot Soc...

You want to contact SANBI.

 

  • 120 years of rotational forestry not giving seed bank a chance to germinate.
  • Fire not in the area for this duration to stimulate the process needed and remove competition.
  • Seedbank in other areas hybridised with other species.
  • Upper slopes not the main conservation effort, lower Tokai success critical with upper slopes emphasis on creating a biodiversity corridor.

General summary. The "finger" into the suburbs in lower Tokai does not exist in places where the Sandveld species grow or conservation a possibility making this one of the last possible conservation areas where they can find success. The corridor is vital to the rest of the conservation mandate of this being a world heritage site and keeping the status.

Headshot

Apr 1, 2015, 11:23 AM

Ok, so here's where we get a bit sensitive.. pun intended.

 

There was someone who was not satisfied with the burn protocol of Table Mountain National Park so sought his confirmation from a prolific and sometimes rebellious in character scientist. This guy walked around showing anyone interested the email its contents to prove his point - Valid email or not, that's not my point.

 

So skip ahead to the fire and the timeframe we all rebuke as non-sensical, especially when compared to other areas.

 

The fires were still burning when a low-level report surfaced claiming the area would need 18-24 months in rehab, requiring Tokai to be closed to public access for the duration. It doesn't take a rocket-scientist to work out that Table Mountain National Park is honouring the timeframe of this report, as it is deemed best by the man leading the project for the conservation of the area. I doubt Table Mountain National Park are forced into this timeframe either but considering the opportunity around closure for the pine removal, 18mnths may well be an accurate stab.

 

With the pines all being extracted in one year, the wide scale fire now lessens the burden of an ecoburn and Table Mountain National Park every year being critised by the public and others, around their ineptitude to conduct controlled fires.

 

Oddly, the guy backing the email is now also in the boat questioning why the timeframe is required, showing yet again that there are two sides to everything we wish for 

Okay so in your  opinion rehab means closure. You see I question that big time. the two are not mutually exclusive.

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 11:28 AM

you have got to be sh#Ting me Deon.....

there are no hard feelings, I can perfectly understand why everyone wants to find fault with Parks. They control the areas we can ride and the process of getting new trails is slow.

 

It's like the aliens being used as fodder for the cause of proving Cape Nature are better suited to run this Park...

 

Can you imagine if everything had to start again?? Better the devil you know I say!

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 11:30 AM

Okay so in your  opinion rehab means closure. You see I question that big time. the two are not mutually exclusive.

The closure is not my opinion.. I see you question that. ;)

Capricorn

Apr 1, 2015, 11:42 AM

Deon: what's the 'cost' if heritage status is lost?

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 11:55 AM

Gosh, I dunno. Cape Town would stand to lose, Alan Winde likes the idea of having it.

dirtypot

Apr 1, 2015, 12:04 PM

Quick question that I don't know the answer to - why is the east/south side of Silvermine not open to cyclists?  I know that the rest of Silvermine wasn't open for cycling a while ago and don't know the story to how that came about either.  
Looking at trail hiking maps it looks like there are a lot of trails on that side of the mountain - was just thinking that the fire could provide a nice opportunity to develop some riding trails on that side.

Or is this a total no go option for whatever reason?

Flowta

Apr 1, 2015, 12:06 PM

Quick question that I don't know the answer to - why is the east/south side of Silvermine not open to cyclists?  I know that the rest of Silvermine wasn't open for cycling a while ago and don't know the story to how that came about either.  

Looking at trail hiking maps it looks like there are a lot of trails on that side of the mountain - was just thinking that the fire could provide a nice opportunity to develop some riding trails on that side.

Or is this a total no go option for whatever reason?

 

Because bikes are EVIL!!! didn't you know?

DJR

Apr 1, 2015, 12:21 PM

Quick question that I don't know the answer to - why is the east/south side of Silvermine not open to cyclists?  I know that the rest of Silvermine wasn't open for cycling a while ago and don't know the story to how that came about either.  

Looking at trail hiking maps it looks like there are a lot of trails on that side of the mountain - was just thinking that the fire could provide a nice opportunity to develop some riding trails on that side.

Or is this a total no go option for whatever reason?

I'm speaking under correction, but I think it has to do with a management policy to try and keep conflicting user groups apart and thus reduce the likely-hood of clashing. 

 

Personally I think there is enough proof that we can co-exist with walkers and runners if there is enough room for everyone. 

Flowta

Apr 1, 2015, 12:51 PM

Ok, so here's where we get a bit sensitive.. pun intended.

 

There was someone who was not satisfied with the burn protocol of Table Mountain National Park so sought his confirmation from a prolific and sometimes rebellious in character scientist. This guy walked around showing anyone interested the email its contents to prove his point - Valid email or not, that's not my point.

 

So skip ahead to the fire and the timeframe we all rebuke as non-sensical, especially when compared to other areas.

 

The fires were still burning when a low-level report surfaced claiming the area would need 18-24 months in rehab, requiring Tokai to be closed to public access for the duration. It doesn't take a rocket-scientist to work out that Table Mountain National Park is honouring the timeframe of this report, as it is deemed best by the man leading the project for the conservation of the area. I doubt Table Mountain National Park are forced into this timeframe either but considering the opportunity around closure for the pine removal, 18mnths may well be an accurate stab.

 

With the pines all being extracted in one year, the wide scale fire now lessens the burden of an ecoburn and Table Mountain National Park every year being critised by the public and others, around their ineptitude to conduct controlled fires.

 

Oddly, the guy backing the email is now also in the boat questioning why the timeframe is required, showing yet again that there are two sides to everything we wish for.

 

Who exactly are you referring to? You sure you got your facts straight about the reasons for contacting "the scientist"?

 

Personally I don't see the fault in asking questions of SANP, even if they are difficult? Or even getting some objective opinions.

 

Currently there appears to be 2 sides each with their own subjective views, there is possibly a more realistic reality somewhere in-between. Without debate and/or objective views this will not be found.

 

Without the objectiveness and/or transparency there will always be questions asked.

 

You shouldn't take a criticism of SANP as an attack on you.

Headshot

Apr 1, 2015, 2:51 PM

I agree.  Any large organization especially statutory ones like parks deserve some decent crit to help them perform better. It seems to me some people would rather highlight what they perceive to be the worst in the MTB user group rather than examine the actions and behaviour of  the large organization in question...

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 4:18 PM

I'm speaking under correction, but I think it has to do with a management policy to try and keep conflicting user groups apart and thus reduce the likely-hood of clashing. 

 

Personally I think there is enough proof that we can co-exist with walkers and runners if there is enough room for everyone. 

Indeed, the last 7 years in Tokai is proof of shared jeep track and how this came to being is through the horses making use of mountain bike designated areas. I see on the latest draft map the local horse group has put together shows all the JT in the mountain bike side open for use. 

 

Hopeful about coexisting. Just a bit of education around how to approach horses and we are set.  :thumbup:

DJR

Apr 1, 2015, 5:06 PM

..........Just a bit of education around how to approach horses and we are set.  :thumbup:

You mean to say there is another way? I thought shouting "Stravaaaaaaa" at 50 km/h in a cloud of dust with flashing lights and screaming brakes coming from the blind side of the horse was the only way to do it.

(Deon)

Apr 1, 2015, 5:13 PM

You mean to say there is another way? I thought shouting "Stravaaaaaaa" at 50 km/h in a cloud of dust with flashing lights and screaming brakes coming from the blind side of the horse was the only way to do it.

Sorry, did you just put up your hand to be the first recruit in, "final horse approach 101"?

 

On second thought, I doubt anyone will be able to unlearn that level of wrong, ever.

marko35s

Apr 1, 2015, 6:27 PM

Quick question that I don't know the answer to - why is the east/south side of Silvermine not open to cyclists? I know that the rest of Silvermine wasn't open for cycling a while ago and don't know the story to how that came about either.

Looking at trail hiking maps it looks like there are a lot of trails on that side of the mountain - was just thinking that the fire could provide a nice opportunity to develop some riding trails on that side.

Or is this a total no go option for whatever reason?

At the moment all options are being explored but nothing is going to happen too quickly.
dirtypot

Apr 2, 2015, 8:33 AM

At the moment all options are being explored but nothing is going to happen too quickly.

 

Nothing ever does...

Add a comment

You must log in to comment