Events

Rourke Croeser found guilty of two anti-doping rule violations

By Press Office · 65 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that mountain bike cyclist Rourke Croeser has been found guilty of two anti-doping rule violations.

  1. The first anti-doping rule violation was for the presence of Recombinant EPO in an out-of-competition test conducted on 30 August 2015 in Andorra (Europe) before the Cross Country World Championships.
  2. The second anti-doping rule violation was for the presence of Phentermine in an in-competition test conducted on 03 October 2015 at the Isuzu 3 Towers Stage Race in Mpumalanga.

ccs-2-0-80116300-1458818771.jpg

Mr. Croeser requested that his B samples be tested in both cases and both confirmed the original findings. Mr. Croeser did not dispute the findings and charges against him. As a consequence, he was deemed to have waived the right to a hearing and the South African Institute for Drug Free Sport (SAIDS) last week issued a written decision. It found that he was guilty of both anti-doping rule violations. Mr. Croeser’s results extending back to 30 August 2015 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

SAIDS handed down a written decision in which it sanctioned him to a four-year ban for each of the anti-doping rule violations but they will run concurrently. The World Anti-Doping Code obliges SAIDS to make the sanctions run concurrently because the two doping infractions occurred fairly quickly after each other and before the athlete was notified of the first offence.

The four-year period of ineligibility will run from November 23, 2015 to November 22, 2019.

Mr. Croeser has been given 21 days after notification to appeal the decision.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process and will respect the outcome. Cycling SA further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Tags: ,

Comments

Wez-O

Mar 24, 2016, 1:52 PM

LOL!

 

  • luke_besterDoing the same thing now Rourkechanged wheels for wetsuits bro haha. Working for subtech in durbs maybe see you around boet  @rourkecroeser

Seems to have taken up a new career diving...

What kind of "diving"?  :ph34r:

Warren_G

Mar 24, 2016, 1:55 PM

LOL!

 

  • luke_besterDoing the same thing now Rourkechanged wheels for wetsuits bro haha. Working for subtech in durbs maybe see you around boet  @rourkecroeser

Seems to have taken up a new career diving...

Looks like he's doing a commercial diving course

Guest Lancesball

Mar 24, 2016, 1:56 PM

 

Name and shame the Dr's and coaches involved.

 

Hendrik Lemmer ‏@GrootLem  9m

Hendrik Lemmer Retweeted Bicycling SA

Ag nee man Rourke. Disappointed that you also lied to me in my face. Now help the sport, tell us who else dopes

 

 

Are you saying that a coach Rourke worked with helped him dope?

Guest Lancesball

Mar 24, 2016, 2:01 PM

I dont have any evidence but the results are there for all to see. Unless of course you believe in miracles or that clean riders are faster than dopers, which would of course make doping obsolete. 

 

So your theory is that cause riders beat Rourke who was now caught doping, means that they also dope?

 

So over the last year of his racing, that would be the following off the top of my head:

 

Darren

Gawie

Waylon

Alan

Phil

Matthew

Arno

Nico

James

 

To name a few. So, according to you, all of these riders must be doping cause they, at one race or another, beat Rourke.

 

WOW!!

 

 

The expat cyclist

Mar 24, 2016, 2:17 PM

Ja nê.

And the sad thing is that this is only a topic for discussion because the oke got caught...

In my opinion there are plenty Joe Soaps out there who also dope. But because they are not pro's, they fly below the radar.

 

The things some will do just to have their 5 seconds of fame.

Shame.

Guest notmyname

Mar 24, 2016, 2:37 PM

I believe one of the infringements was at a race in October last year. Which event?

raptor-22

Mar 24, 2016, 2:51 PM

What a frikken tjop!!!

 

2 offenses within 6 weeks of each other. Was he fathered by #1?

nonky

Mar 24, 2016, 2:58 PM

Ma se Croess, this is GREAT news...

 

...one DOF DOPER at a time, i am GETTING CLOSER TO THE PODIUM.

 

Ha ha ha, dumb#### dopers...soon the medals will be MINE - ALL MINE

 

BWA HA HA HAAA.

Tumbleweed

Mar 24, 2016, 3:06 PM

Diving, hey? Would EPO enhance performance in that field? I always think of that liquid they used in The Abyss as a kinda EPO...

Guest notmyname

Mar 24, 2016, 3:07 PM

I believe one of the infringements was at a race in October last year. Which event?

 

Ashburton National MTB Series 

Thor Buttox

Mar 24, 2016, 3:41 PM

I am just glad to see Mathias, Rudi and Nicola are still clean... :ph34r:

 

wc.PNG

Nicola took the Strava KOM up Dorstberg on a training ride. THAT'S more important than UCI XC doping.

 

 

Oops, wrong thread... Sorry

Guest Lancesball

Mar 24, 2016, 3:43 PM

I believe one of the infringements was at a race in October last year. Which event?

 

 

Did you read the report? It has both in the report and what events.

Johnny Lawless

Mar 24, 2016, 5:13 PM

Everyone getting offended/defensive here must immediately be regarded as dopers themselves!

 

(How do I use italics....aargh, nevermind)

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Mar 24, 2016, 5:20 PM

Everyone getting offended/defensive here must immediately be regarded as dopers themselves!

 

(How do I use italics....aargh, nevermind)

Not italics. Comic sans.

 

And at the top where it says "font" on the full desktop version

Guest notmyname

Mar 24, 2016, 5:34 PM

Did you read the report? It has both in the report and what events.

Have you read the whole thread? I did reply to my orginal post with the answer to my question... Thanks for your concern though.

Johnny Lawless

Mar 24, 2016, 5:56 PM

Not italics. Comic sans.

 

And at the top where it says "font" on the full desktop version

Aaaahhh thank you...no wait, I really meant "thank you"

Add a comment

You must log in to comment