Events

Kevin Evans accepts doping charge

By Press Office · 1614 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has charged mountain bike cyclist, Kevin Evans with doping after identifying serious irregularities in his Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) – a profile of the athlete’s blood parameters.

ccs-62657-0-90136700-1453116564.jpgPhoto credit: Dave Macleod/
Gameplan Media

Mr. Evans accepted the charge of doping and did not contest the findings. The ABP is a longitudinal analysis and the suspicious readings were identified over a period of time, therefore the athlete’s results extending back to 14 March 2014 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

He will be banned from sport for four years as of 4 March 2015 until 3 March 2019. The athlete has however indicated that he has retired from professional cycling.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process. Cycling South Africa further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Comments

Andrew Steer

Jan 22, 2016, 7:37 AM

They have to provide evidence from a doctor, exactly how it is determined I'm not sure. Maybe ask a doc to help us out? V12? 

 

Hope it's a water tight system (not just any doc etc)... else like with TUE's, there's no doubt a whole lot of abuse of that loophole too.

Thor Buttox

Jan 22, 2016, 7:38 AM

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: come now this has to be the post of the year,,,,,,,,BWHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Someone else confused a Doctor with a Doctor of Philosophy. Or Doctor Phil.
eddy

Jan 22, 2016, 7:39 AM

They have to provide evidence from a doctor, exactly how it is determined I'm not sure. Maybe ask a doc to help us out? V12? 

 

Surely you mean a doc or V12 ? :ph34r:  :ph34r:  :whistling:

Patchelicious

Jan 22, 2016, 7:41 AM

Not sure you would see those values considering you not a Doctor at any medical level.

The art of baiting is to not make it obvious.

BarHugger

Jan 22, 2016, 7:41 AM

:clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap: :clap:  come now this has to be the post of the year,,,,,,,,BWHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Yeah.....Lancebloubal might need to tone down the smugness and superiority just a tad.....

Guest Lancesball

Jan 22, 2016, 7:42 AM

The art of baiting is to not make it obvious.

 

Not baiting, just saying it how it is. Kind of like his book he wrote on power training.

TheJ

Jan 22, 2016, 7:43 AM

How many Ex Dopers get welcomed back with open arms bu sponsirs, fellow 'pros", race organisers and Fanboi's.

 

post-57055-0-71183800-1453448508_thumb.png

 

http://www.sascoc.co.za/2010/02/10/hoffmans-ban-confirmed/

tikki

Jan 22, 2016, 7:45 AM

.

Patchelicious

Jan 22, 2016, 7:46 AM

How many ex dopers now seem to have an opinion on dopers.....

 

38b3195.jpg

jcza

Jan 22, 2016, 7:46 AM

Is this the Friday thread??

eddy

Jan 22, 2016, 7:48 AM

Not baiting, just saying it how it is.

 

What do you mean by that ?

TheJ

Jan 22, 2016, 7:48 AM

How many ex dopers now seem to have an opinion on dopers.....

 

38b3195.jpg

 

Exactly.

Patchelicious

Jan 22, 2016, 7:51 AM

Back on topic. A real question.

 

Do sanctioned riders get tested...?

 

EG: Rider X gets busted for EPO recieves a back dated 2 year ban, so he needs to serve out lets say 18 months, then he complies and gets a shortened sanction. So lets say that effectively he only serves a year.

 

Could those 12 months not then be used to dope yourself so strong that when you come back you are in a better state than before?

jcza

Jan 22, 2016, 8:00 AM

Back on topic. A real question.

 

Do sanctioned riders get tested...?

 

EG: Rider X gets busted for EPO recieves a back dated 2 year ban, so he needs to serve out lets say 18 months, then he complies and gets a shortened sanction. So lets say that effectively he only serves a year.

 

Could those 12 months not then be used to dope yourself so strong that when you come back you are in a better state than before?

 

I dont think they will be tested while serving the ban, kinda out of the system. 

tikki

Jan 22, 2016, 8:01 AM

They did their best to sweep it under the carpet while pretending to discuss it.

 

They then had a feature which include Roel Paulissen and sung his praises. Ex doper, who came back to the EPIC a few weeks after his doping banned was lifted and then his EPIC partner gets bust. They had a feature on a local race and the new team Telkom and sung Nolan Hoffmans praises, ex doper.

 

Are we surprised it continues?

 

Altech team hired a doper and weeks after his ban was lifted went and race J2C, and have stated their target race for the year is J2C.

 

Are we surprised it continues?

 

How many Ex Dopers get welcomed back with open arms bu sponsirs, fellow 'pros", race organisers and Fanboi's.

 

And we surprised it continues?

 

The media needs to play their part in ostracizing these Dopers.

 

No coverage, no value.

 

This is one of the best comments of this thread,at the end of the day the risk seems worth the reward and if you are busted,well just make a come back, become a ds ,work in the industy or just start a bike shop.that program is a joke and I refuse to watch it but did however check in to see what the vibe would be and as said the air was thick.lol having raced against most of the local guys mentioned in this thread and never quite able to race at there level.i sit back today smiling to myself as I might have never won any big race , I do know that I raced clean and am proud to have done so. Sure I was robbed of a podium here or there a position or a top 10 or that contract I dreamed off. But I know I worked hard and trained harder on water and a few beers and that make me a winner in my eyes. Bans should be harsher.

SwissVan

Jan 22, 2016, 8:02 AM

A few are above 50% naturally. There has been a small few in SA even that have been at that value. Not uncommon at all.

 

A few years ago I went for a check up and one of the tests was for blood hematocrit, the result was 53%... due to the epo in sports issues around that time i was aware of the 50% legal limit as per UCI and queried this with my Dr who dismissed it as most likely due to slight dehydration or some other totally normal activity at the time or just prior to the blood sample being taken.

 

If i recall correctly there was a discussion by the Australian sports institute about 120 years ago saying that they thought the level of 50% was to low and could produce false positives.

DIPSLICK

Jan 22, 2016, 8:02 AM

Not baiting, just saying it how it is. Kind of like his book he wrote on power training.

NOT BAITING, OK !!!!!! HOW IT IS?????

 

What do you mean by that ?

EDDY YOU ME AND THE HUB COLLECTIVE

Andrew Steer

Jan 22, 2016, 8:06 AM

I dont think they will be tested while serving the ban, kinda out of the system. 

 

They barely test the guys in the system...

Spinnekop

Jan 22, 2016, 8:08 AM

Mine is pretty high and I am average cyclist. Resting makes it higher and over training / racing makes it lower. Hence the biological passport can pick up when you are manipulating blood values. For example, with a hydrated cyclist the haematocrit cannot go up during the Tour de France without manipulation. It must go down.

 

I do get problems at night if it is too high. Feeling of palpitations and strong heart rate. But that is another story. I think if you had too high haematocrit and any problems with the heart electrical side at rest, then high haematocrit would make it worse.

 

The fundamental problem of cycling is that racing or training too much reduces red blood cells which affects aerobic performance.

interesting that you know what yours is.

 

How do one go about testing your own value?  Should be interesting to know.....

Andrew Steer

Jan 22, 2016, 8:08 AM

Not baiting, just saying it how it is. Kind of like his book he wrote on power training.

 

Personal agenda much? The anonymous boxer taking petty little swings on the hub... 

rock

Jan 22, 2016, 8:09 AM

I dont think they will be tested while serving the ban, kinda out of the system. 

 I think you have to "be in the system' for 6 months if you plan to race again after your ban.

 

there was a guy overseas whole failed a test during his ban as he was signed to a new team and starting shortly.

jcza

Jan 22, 2016, 8:12 AM

A few years ago I went for a check up and one of the tests was for blood hematocrit, the result was 53%... due to the epo in sports issues around that time i was aware of the 50% legal limit as per UCI and queried this with my Dr who dismissed it as most likely due to slight dehydration or some other totally normal activity at the time or just prior to the blood sample being taken.

 

If i recall correctly there was a discussion by the Australian sports institute about 120 years ago saying that they thought the level of 50% was to low and could produce false positives.

 

The UCI originally proposed 53% which is 3 standard deviations above the norm but after consultation with the teams it was lowered to 50%. Not sure why teams wanted lower limit, apparently it was to catch more dopers.  

BarHugger

Jan 22, 2016, 8:14 AM

A few years ago I went for a check up and one of the tests was for blood hematocrit, the result was 53%... due to the epo in sports issues around that time i was aware of the 50% legal limit as per UCI and queried this with my Dr who dismissed it as most likely due to slight dehydration or some other totally normal activity at the time or just prior to the blood sample being taken.

 

If i recall correctly there was a discussion by the Australian sports institute about 120 years ago saying that they thought the level of 50% was to low and could produce false positives.

Sounds like a case of faulty equipment.....

jcza

Jan 22, 2016, 8:15 AM

interesting that you know what yours is.

 

How do one go about testing your own value?  Should be interesting to know.....

 

Sure a couple of elite cyclists can help you out here. Didn't RC have a testing kit? 

TheJ

Jan 22, 2016, 8:16 AM

Sure a couple of elite cyclists can help you out here. Didn't RC have a testing kit? 

 

No, he was just servicing his brakes. :ph34r:

Add a comment

You must log in to comment