Events

Kevin Evans accepts doping charge

By Press Office · 1614 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has charged mountain bike cyclist, Kevin Evans with doping after identifying serious irregularities in his Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) – a profile of the athlete’s blood parameters.

ccs-62657-0-90136700-1453116564.jpgPhoto credit: Dave Macleod/
Gameplan Media

Mr. Evans accepted the charge of doping and did not contest the findings. The ABP is a longitudinal analysis and the suspicious readings were identified over a period of time, therefore the athlete’s results extending back to 14 March 2014 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

He will be banned from sport for four years as of 4 March 2015 until 3 March 2019. The athlete has however indicated that he has retired from professional cycling.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process. Cycling South Africa further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Comments

Patchelicious

Jan 20, 2016, 2:21 PM

41 pages... have we reached a verdict yet?

Yes, justice has finally been served with regards to the Chemical brother bullies.
BDF

Jan 20, 2016, 2:22 PM

Agreed...but now a little off topic....what about gatkruipery at school ?

Here's an apple Ma'am...

Garamundege Mugabe

Jan 20, 2016, 2:24 PM

I think this is a bit of baiting just to get some reaction............shame man.

 

Cheating your way to the top of anything.......for what.....fame?  Fortune?  Bursary?  Rugby captain?

Nothing is then earned.  You are then a class 1 fraud.  Where is the pride in that? 

If you have to cheat to be "something", you must be pretty empty inside and in general you are missing the whole point of life on earth.

ah.. the point of life on earth.. waxing philosophical here. Respect that argument. But is it *relevant*, is it the future? From what I've seen, the new cool is 'get rich quick, do whatever it takes, only winning counts, second doesn't'..

BarHugger

Jan 20, 2016, 2:26 PM

ah.. the point of life on earth.. waxing philosophical here. Respect that argument. But is it *relevant*, is it the future? From what I've seen, the new cool is 'get rich quick, do whatever it takes, only winning counts, second doesn't'..

Sounds a little bit like entitlement...earn the max rewards by doing the minimal.....

BarHugger

Jan 20, 2016, 2:27 PM

Here's an apple Ma'am...

Cell or iPad?

BDF

Jan 20, 2016, 2:30 PM

Cell or iPad?

Bwaaa haa haa. I should've thought that one through!

Garamundege Mugabe

Jan 20, 2016, 2:40 PM

Sounds a little bit like entitlement...earn the max rewards by doing the minimal.....

you could be quite correct - but if you had to choose, with brutal honesty, would you really choose an honest second over first?  I don't know..

Thanks for the chat gentlemen, apologies if I raised anyone's blood pressure with my devil's advocacy!

Mntboy

Jan 20, 2016, 2:40 PM

Cell or iPad?

Or MacBook?
BarHugger

Jan 20, 2016, 2:43 PM

you could be quite correct - but if you had to choose, with brutal honesty, would you really choose an honest second over first?  I don't know..

Thanks for the chat gentlemen, apologies if I raised anyone's blood pressure with my devil's advocacy!

That is a very deep question and will ultimately ly with the individual and their ability to live firstly with themselves....and secondly living a lie.....rather shoot me.... 

Mntboy

Jan 20, 2016, 2:49 PM

you could be quite correct - but if you had to choose, with brutal honesty, would you really choose an honest second over first? I don't know..

Thanks for the chat gentlemen, apologies if I raised anyone's blood pressure with my devil's advocacy!

The honest second if that's what my hard work and effort affords me. I want to know that I've earned the achievements I get in life. Sometimes there just is right or wrong. The choice to cheat is one such time.
Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Jan 20, 2016, 2:52 PM

you could be quite correct - but if you had to choose, with brutal honesty, would you really choose an honest second over first?  I don't know..

Thanks for the chat gentlemen, apologies if I raised anyone's blood pressure with my devil's advocacy!

easy. 2nd place, knowing the oke in first would just be a needle away from having everything taken away from him. 

 

And no, it's not devil's advocacy. You're saying doping isn't bad, and you'd find nothing wrong with subjecting a kid to the doping lifestyle. Shame on you. Well done for perpetuating the rot.

BDF

Jan 20, 2016, 2:56 PM

easy. 2nd place, knowing the oke in first would just be a needle away from having everything taken away from him. 

 

And no, it's not devil's advocacy. You're saying doping isn't bad, and you'd find nothing wrong with subjecting a kid to the doping lifestyle. Shame on you. Well done for perpetuating the rot.

Personally, if I were an advocate, the devil would not be on my client list!

Patchelicious

Jan 20, 2016, 2:59 PM

Nothing to do with Strava but with plausible human performance but let me not spit in the soup and go along with less dirty although nobody really believes that (unless you believe in miracles)

Ok jeez, forget that I said Strava...

 

It has long been agreed by scientist that using times up climbs is not a relevant measurement of comparative capability.

jcza

Jan 20, 2016, 3:01 PM

Ok jeez, forget that I said Strava...

 

It has long been agreed by scientist that using times up climbs is not a relevant measurement of comparative capability.

 

Sure about that? 

Captain Fastbastard Mayhem

Jan 20, 2016, 3:06 PM

Sure about that? 

Isolation and all that. 

Eugene Oppelt

Jan 20, 2016, 3:09 PM

Or MacBook?

 

 

Or Watch :ph34r:

Tumbleweed

Jan 20, 2016, 3:21 PM

lol - this "junk" is the cutting edge of medical science mate.. you'd be mad if I gave it to your kid - even if it made him 1st team rugby captain? and got him a nice fat varsity bursary with juicy supplements endorsements? yeah..  I often ask my wife if the old world values we teach our kids equip them for the future... 

 

If I ever found out my kid was taking supplements at varsity I would stop paying his fees and disown him...

Tumbleweed

Jan 20, 2016, 3:25 PM

Ok jeez, forget that I said Strava...

 

It has long been agreed by scientist that using times up climbs is not a relevant measurement of comparative capability.

 

I wonder what Michele Ferrari would use these days?

Patchelicious

Jan 20, 2016, 3:26 PM

Sure about that?

Pretty much. There are so many variables to take into account that is makes it almost impossible to compare performances on the open road. Day, temp, wind, fatigue/freshness, stage in training block, race strategies (the only constant in this equation is gravity :) ). Eg comparing Froomes VAM in the first attack in the Tour vs Quintanas VAM at the end, doesn't mean much.

 

Unless you get all the pros, in a rested, trained state and make them race up a set hill at the same time, with no other GC/KOM race strategies etc. to worry about, you cant really compare the efforts with much certainty.

 

This seems to be one of the few points that Ross and Jerone actually agree on :)

 

If you disagree, why not substantiate it? Just disagreeing doesn't help.

Mntboy

Jan 20, 2016, 3:31 PM

Ok jeez, forget that I said Strava...

 

It has long been agreed by scientist that using times up climbs is not a relevant measurement of comparative capability.

Sure about that?

Isolation and all that.

I am finally getting round to reading Emma O'Reilley's book concerning her time with Postal and she makes/made an interesting observation concerning LA and his team mates at the time. Apparently his efforts were of an all in nature whereas some kept some gas in the tank so to speak. She writes that she felt it in the difference within the way his muscles felt compared to theirs. Can't recall the exact description but essentially different riders are going to give different levels of effort and will therefore have differing rates of recovery. Hence a pure scientific analysis is made difficult by the above even for riders who are completely identical in every other respects.
jcza

Jan 20, 2016, 3:31 PM

Pretty much. There are so many variables to take into account that is makes it almost impossible to compare performances on the open road. Day, temp, wind, fatigue/freshness, stage in training block, race strategies. Eg comparing Froomes VAM in the first attack in the Tour vs Quintanas VAM at the end, doesn't mean much.

 

Unless you get all the pros, in a rested, trained state and make them race up a set hill at the same time, with no other GC/KOM race strategies etc. to worry about, you cant really compare the efforts with much certainty.

 

This seems to be one of the few points that Ross and Jerone actually agree on :)

 

If you disagree, why not substantiate it? Just disagreeing doesn't help.

 

I asked if you're sure. 

andydude

Jan 20, 2016, 3:54 PM

Twitter is much more entertaining than this thread. Or are we really not that bad a bunch :)

 

171303e386e1f89488d4c73fb738a42a.jpg

Garamundege Mugabe

Jan 20, 2016, 4:22 PM

easy. 2nd place, knowing the oke in first would just be a needle away from having everything taken away from him. 

 

And no, it's not devil's advocacy. You're saying doping isn't bad, and you'd find nothing wrong with subjecting a kid to the doping lifestyle. Shame on you. Well done for perpetuating the rot.

ah, there's always a Mother Grundy.. have you heard of Darwin? What if your descendants curse you for denying them their head-start in the (human) race - which takes no account of artificial constructs like morals.. will your safe, rigid view of what's 'right' enable them to compete, in a world of enhanced super-athletes?  but never mind, they'll be comforted by the notion that you did what you thought was 'right', in your little world view...

Tumbleweed

Jan 20, 2016, 4:41 PM

ah, there's always a Mother Grundy.. have you heard of Darwin? What if your descendants curse you for denying them their head-start in the (human) race - which takes no account of artificial constructs like morals.. will your safe, rigid view of what's 'right' enable them to compete, in a world of enhanced super-athletes?  but never mind, they'll be comforted by the notion that you did what you thought was 'right', in your little world view...

 

Krypton faced an eerily similar dilemma...

Garamundege Mugabe

Jan 20, 2016, 4:49 PM

Krypton faced an eerily similar dilemma...

yip - so did Roelf Meyer, when no-one else could stomach the need to talk to the ANC, so did Noakes, even after contradicting himself in 'Lore of Running'..  hehe

Add a comment

You must log in to comment