Events

Croeser contravenes UCI medical rules

By Press Office · 243 comments

National team rider Rourke Croeser was found to be in possession of a syringe at the recent World MTB Championships in Andorra. This is in direct contravention of the UCI Medical rules and specifically in relation to the sub-section “Ban on Injections”. The possession of syringes is in violation of UCI Medical rule 13.03.058 (2). The rule states:

13.3.058 In addition to the sanctions stipulated in article 13.3.057 the following shall apply:

1. In case of infringement of article 13.3.055 all results obtained by the rider in the 48 hours period shall be disqualified.

2. In case a violation of article 13.3.052 occurs at a race the licence holder(s) concerned and, where appropriate, the whole team of the licence holder(s) at fault may be excluded from the race; in this respect the possession of objects used or fit for an injection shall be presumed to constitute evidence of a violation of article 13.3.052 having been committed except if the objects are in the possession of the medical doctor who has made the report referred to in article 13.3.052.5 and are covered by such report and except for those objects that may reasonably be in a medical doctor’s possession. The exclusion may be decided by the president of the commissaires’ panel after having given the persons concerned the opportunity to be heard or by the president of the UCI Disciplinary Commission upon report by the president of the commissaires’ panel.

Mr. Croeser voluntarily withdrew from the Championships. The matter is now being dealt with by Cycling South Africa according to the prescribed UCI rules.

William Newman, President of Cycling SA, re-iterated that the National Federation will continue to strive to ensure that riders are aware of the UCI medical rules. Cycling SA will not tolerate any activities by athletes that may be an infringement of UCI medical or anti-doping regulations.

Comments

Brickleberry

Sep 9, 2015, 5:54 PM

Regardless ,he is a tit for even having it. And a syringe in a cyclist possession when the rules state it's illegal is definitely smoke.

intern

Sep 9, 2015, 9:40 PM

Your example does not make sense to me. Scott said where there is smoke there is usually a fire, in this case there is "smoke"

WHat do you mean 'smoke'? There is actually 'fire'. Dude was caught breaking a rule for which there is a sanction. There's nothing to speculate about that.

What he was using 'medical testing' and injecting paraphernalia for, well, that's a whole new bag of issues, isn't it.

Anyway, cycling and cheating are like hand and glove. Always has been, probably always will be. Provides entertainment, though.

Ryanpmb

Sep 10, 2015, 3:33 AM

Anyway, cycling and cheating are like hand and glove. Always has been, probably always will be.

While we're steaming ahead on the skeptic train, this is probably the case for most professional sports. The pressure will always be there and boundaries will always be pushed. That said though, the UCI have done a lot to curb doping and have made huge inroads into making it extremely difficult (and potentially costly) to do so. This incident is a perfect example.

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 6:00 AM

Ek het die antwoord vir jou daar.

 

Jip!! baie van ons ryers moet hulle eie goed diens omdat CSA nie vir als betaal nie, en baie van die ryers gaan oor op geld wat hulle moes self weg sit en die vol onder onderstening onder seker brands val daai kant nie.

 

Daar gaan baie meer agter die prentjie aan as n mens daai kant van die wereld resies ry. Parte daai kant is nie goedkoop volgend wat ons geld trade op die oomlik, maak dit nie als maklik ook nie. Ek het n paar vriende wat oorsee race en worlds race, en die goed wat hulle vertel als, sal jou stom los. 

 

Laat ons maar kyk wat die storie is aan die einde van die dag. So iets kan gebruik word om sealant in te spyt of vir brieke te herstel.  

Seriously? Someone breaks the LAW and you look for an excuse? Do you honestly think that he wanted to inject sealant or bleed brakes? 

 

I can not understand why people always want to bend the law when it suits them, or look for a loophole, like you wanted to use it for bleeding brakes.

 

It is easy, there is a rule and if you break the rule you are in trouble. 

 

If he was racing and left the course due to a fall, and the rule states clearly where you can rejoin and he did not. Will you also say, but CSA did not provide him with a mechanic so he had to bleed his brakes himself and clearly the bad bleed caused him to fall and go off the course?

 

It is VERY easy: Follow the rule, if you don't and get caught bye!

intern

Sep 10, 2015, 7:10 AM

While we're steaming ahead on the skeptic train, this is probably the case for most professional sports. The pressure will always be there and boundaries will always be pushed. That said though, the UCI have done a lot to curb doping and have made huge inroads into making it extremely difficult (and potentially costly) to do so. This incident is a perfect example.

It may be the case for most sports, but we're not discussing most sports here. The tu quo que diversion is just that, a diversion.

Odinson

Sep 10, 2015, 7:28 AM

 

That smelly smell kind of smell. 

raptor-22

Sep 10, 2015, 8:12 AM

Yes I was pretty shocked when he popped up and so were the commentators

Konaman

Sep 10, 2015, 10:18 AM

All of you with special glasses that can see into the future, please stop the bus on the spot.

 

Lets wait for the verdict and stop this game of speculating.

 

Leave this "skinder or gossip stories " to the old ladies in the small towns that do not have anything else to say, in order to feel good about themselves and how bad everyone else is.

 

Lets leave this matter untill the UCI provides us with a Press Release.

 

I am sure mr C also has legal rights  when people defame him in public, without having facts. (there has been numerous court cases about FB lately)

 

(i am not connected to him in anyway, but feel that this matter needs to be handled with sensitivity, untill all the facts are on the table)

rock

Sep 10, 2015, 10:23 AM

there's no speculating, CSA have advised the facts. a Syringe was found in his possession.

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 10:30 AM

What Rock said, no excuse for this one.

 

No excuse is going to be good enough. Done

Meezo

Sep 10, 2015, 10:46 AM

All of you with special glasses that can see into the future, please stop the bus on the spot.

 

Lets wait for the verdict and stop this game of speculating.

 

Leave this "skinder or gossip stories " to the old ladies in the small towns that do not have anything else to say, in order to feel good about themselves and how bad everyone else is.

 

Lets leave this matter untill the UCI provides us with a Press Release.

 

I am sure mr C also has legal rights  when people defame him in public, without having facts. (there has been numerous court cases about FB lately)

 

(i am not connected to him in anyway, but feel that this matter needs to be handled with sensitivity, untill all the facts are on the table)

 

i was found with a box of matches...

 

my Mum never believe me that i was using it for fireworks!

 

 

 

 

 

 

...a spanking of a life time!

Andrew Steer

Sep 10, 2015, 10:47 AM

What Rock said, no excuse for this one.

 

No excuse is going to be good enough. Done

 

But what if he was just going to use the syringe to fill gel capsules with bi-carb? Sounds perfectly plausible...

Guest notmyname

Sep 10, 2015, 10:50 AM

But what if he was just going to use the syringe to fill gel capsules with bi-carb? Sounds perfectly plausible...

I see what you did there. Lol.

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 11:14 AM

But what if he was just going to use the syringe to fill gel capsules with bi-carb? Sounds perfectly plausible...

HAHA 

 

Does not matter what he wanted to use it for, he can say he wanted to clean his glasses with it....still in trouble

TALUS

Sep 10, 2015, 11:31 AM

He rather should have asked his Pharmacist to do it for him.

 

But what if he was just going to use the syringe to fill gel capsules with bi-carb? Sounds perfectly plausible...

Ryanpmb

Sep 10, 2015, 11:47 AM

It may be the case for most sports, but we're not discussing most sports here. The tu quo que diversion is just that, a diversion.

Agreed. But cynicism isn't going to move the sport forward either. Let's hope the UCI and CSA keep to building consistency in the way such incidents are dealt with. It can't be that difficult.

eddy

Sep 10, 2015, 12:11 PM

He rather should have asked his Pharmacist to do it for him.

 

And he should have kept the receipts...

Squier

Sep 10, 2015, 12:30 PM

What's the minimum sanction for this?

Gnarly

Sep 10, 2015, 12:39 PM

What's the minimum sanction for this?

 

Read some where, 8 days - 6months.... and/or a 1000 Swiss Franc fine.

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 12:43 PM

All of you with special glasses that can see into the future, please stop the bus on the spot.

 

Lets wait for the verdict and stop this game of speculating.

 

Leave this "skinder or gossip stories " to the old ladies in the small towns that do not have anything else to say, in order to feel good about themselves and how bad everyone else is.

 

Lets leave this matter untill the UCI provides us with a Press Release.

 

I am sure mr C also has legal rights  when people defame him in public, without having facts. (there has been numerous court cases about FB lately)

 

(i am not connected to him in anyway, but feel that this matter needs to be handled with sensitivity, untill all the facts are on the table)

What more facts do you want no the table other than? You are not allowed to have a syringe on you.

Donovan Le Cok

Sep 10, 2015, 12:47 PM

Does anyone know for fact. Is it just a syringe or a syringe with a needle?

 

Important difference I think,... maybe...

fanievb

Sep 10, 2015, 12:50 PM

Does anyone know for fact. Is it just a syringe or a syringe with a needle?

 

Important difference I think,... maybe...

 

that is the million dolla question 

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 12:51 PM

Does anyone know for fact. Is it just a syringe or a syringe with a needle?

 

Important difference I think,... maybe...

 

It might me a difference to his "intent" but as far as teh rules goes, he is in trouble

karma

Sep 10, 2015, 12:57 PM

What's the minimum sanction for this?

 

From the UCI or the Hub?

Huge difference. 

Niner

Sep 10, 2015, 12:59 PM

From the UCI or the Hub?

Huge difference. 

Who is the UCI? Hub makes all the rules

Add a comment

You must log in to comment