Events

Adverse Analytical Finding returned during in-competition test

By BikeHubCoreAdmin · 66 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that Craig Stone returned an adverse analytical finding in an in-competition test conducted by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) on 11 May 2013.

ccs-41808-0-60178700-1382616962.jpg

The analytical report confirmed the presence of the Glucocorticosteroid Prednisone and its metabolite, Prednisolone in his urine sample. Craig is therefore provisionally suspended with immediate effect from competing in any event. The SAIDS process will now take its course.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process and will respect the outcome. Cycling SA further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness programmes and extensive testing.

Comments

Red Zone

Oct 25, 2013, 11:22 AM

Test me and I will probably test positive for absorbing the cortisone in the cream that I use on my kids' eczema, no TUE for that I am sure. Although it is true in my my case, it is a fantastic excuse, even Lance would kick himself for not having come up with it.

Lefty V

Oct 25, 2013, 11:37 AM

I guess I did over react as first - logic stepped in a day later. I'm just really tired of doping.

 

Motive and circumstance are the emotional side though - not the factual side. It's really down to the TUE now. He has been tested - an illegal substance was found. Unless he comes up with a TUE the motivation and circumstance count for nought. 6 month ban minimum I reckon without a TUE.

 

Read my bit about the dual system - that'll tell you what my opinion is on what the correct punishment should be.

 

At least we can agree on the "tired of doping" bit.

 

Hey, this Chris Stone person might share that feeling with us for all we know

Sworks20

Oct 25, 2013, 11:41 AM

I'm pretty sure he won't have a TUE.If every time a GP prescibed that ,or flu medication to someone that was going to be doing a race in the near future,imagine the chaos if everyone then applied for a TUE.This is what might happen in future if he gets nailed.

 

There is a valid TUE. All info and documentation being handed over at hearing.

DJR

Oct 25, 2013, 11:48 AM

There is a valid TUE. All info and documentation being handed over at hearing.

 

You sure a TUE can be handed over on a FRI? This is SA after all, and nothing works here on a FRI. Perhaps it's got to be done on a TUE to work? ;)

SwissVan

Oct 25, 2013, 11:52 AM

There is a valid TUE. All info and documentation being handed over at hearing.

 

Interesting

 

Was the TUE obtained before the + test?

 

 

I wonder which one he was taking, logic says pilletjies.

 

According to the UCI:

 

You must complete a full TUE application if you take glucocorticosteroids by any of the following systemic routes:

  • Orally – through the mouth, usually in the form of pills or tablets
  • Intravenous injection – injected into a vein
  • Intramuscular injection – injected straight into a muscle
  • Rectally – into the rectum usually in the form of a suppository or rectal application of a cream.

stringbean

Oct 25, 2013, 1:05 PM

What I don't understand then is why would CSA make a report public of a failed drug test if a TUE exists?That is very damaging to a rider and they of all people are the FIRST to know about a TUE.Drugfreesport SA would also be aware that the TUE exists.I believe they must of applied for a retroactive or emergency TUE as is allowed.

Sworks20

Oct 25, 2013, 1:08 PM

The whole series of events will be out after the hearing and thats all there is for now to be said but many of you will need to say sorry.

urbanroyal

Oct 25, 2013, 1:11 PM

When is the hearing ?

stringbean

Oct 25, 2013, 1:13 PM

I also think this is just a case of honest mistake.I really think CSA should NOT go public until after a hearing.No matter what happens at the hearing,damage has been done and I don't see CSA saying sorry or making any other public statement.

Sworks20

Oct 25, 2013, 1:26 PM

The hearing should be next week.

dillon

Oct 25, 2013, 2:22 PM

csa are just showing you all they do do something with your licence fees, not just pay salaries party expenses

Baaisikilist

Oct 25, 2013, 2:26 PM

When is the hearing ?

 

Those things can really get dragged out... And if you read CSA's rules, once they've notified you of your adverse analytical finding, they reserve the right to issue a press release. They assume everybody knows the way the procedure works, so don't expect them to inform you of said press release prior to it being issued. Other than getting a chance to notify your family before they see it in the press, it doesn't really matter too much if you're ultimately found guilty, but if he does have a TUE or isn't found guilty of any wrong doing, the whole immediate press release to blacken your name before a hearing is a lot of BS. Will they issue any form of public apology if he's clean as quickly. I think not.

TALUS

Oct 25, 2013, 7:39 PM

I have often wondered about this releasing of names early: an underaged (alleged) murderer's name wont be released before being found guilty - what will happen with a 15y old with a positive A -sample?

 

Danger Dassie

Oct 25, 2013, 10:10 PM

csa are just showing you all they do do something with your licence fees, not just pay salaries party expenses

 

CSA don't do the test, nor do they facilitate the process. SAIDS do, and if there's a positive in the test, they inform the relevant sporting federation. In this case, CSA. The paperwork is in triplicate, one for SAIDS, the sporting federation, the athlete and fourth with details blanked out other than the sample serial numbers. That accompanies the samples that go to the lab.

RoboLuke

Oct 26, 2013, 3:51 AM

ag ***. this again...not the guy so called doping..but the guy that takes vicks then then gets taken to the gallows. the real issue here is that the people who makes and implement the rules are creating jobs for themselves.

keep the testing to the top athletes and keep it for drugs that actually really makes a performance difference. or ban other chemicals like water and bananas and cramp pills and gells because man...those things makes all of us lot faster.

Should we test people who are fun riders middle of the pack results regardless of whether you can see the deca running out their ears?

Should we test people coming in the top for medication that has a theoretical 0.0001% improvement?

leave the tests for the top athletes and stop wasting the tax payers money

...and make the tests for roids and epo only

NINER_boy

Oct 26, 2013, 4:09 AM

ag ***. this again...not the guy so called doping..but the guy that takes vicks then then gets taken to the gallows. the real issue here is that the people who makes and implement the rules are creating jobs for themselves.

keep the testing to the top athletes and keep it for drugs that actually really makes a performance difference. or ban other chemicals like water and bananas and cramp pills and gells because man...those things makes all of us lot faster.

Should we test people who are fun riders middle of the pack results regardless of whether you can see the deca running out their ears?

Should we test people coming in the top for medication that has a theoretical 0.0001% improvement?

leave the tests for the top athletes and stop wasting the tax payers money

...and make the tests for roids and epo only

 

+1

Thorn199

Nov 27, 2013, 10:34 AM

Not guilty! Awesome news...

Add a comment

You must log in to comment