Events

Adverse Analytical Finding – in-competition test

By Press Office · 239 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that veteran cyclist Hendrik Anderson (licence number: 14407) returned an adverse analytical finding in an in-competition test conducted by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) on 25 October 2013 at the Cape Pioneer MTB event.

The analytical report confirmed the presence of the stimulant Phentermine in Hendrik Anderson’s urine sample. Following the hearing which was conducted by an Independent Tribunal on 29 May 2014, Mr. Anderson was found guilty and has received a two year ban from all sport effective from 28 January 2014 to 27 January 2016. Mr. Anderson has the right to appeal the decision.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process and respects the outcome. Cycling SA further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness programmes and extensive testing.

Comments

Frosty

Jul 20, 2014, 6:51 PM

 

 

Do the race organizers give any input, seeing as they pay for it (with our entry fees)?

I'm not aware that organisers pay for this.

They are requested to provide a suitable (private) place for athletes to be tested.

 

I was given a list of names and race numbers, by CSA officials, and asked that the names be announced at the finish (2014 Carnival City Macsteel National Classic). The start list had to be given to them to reference the riders against the race numbers. That's all that was required from an organiser.

 

 

 

Jaco-fiets

Jul 20, 2014, 7:22 PM

Guys this oak got tested positive for duromine ( as prescribed). He never was close to podium for the race so just let it be........

andydude

Jul 21, 2014, 7:14 AM

I'm confused.

Wyatt Earp

Jul 21, 2014, 7:24 AM

I'm confused.

 

Same here.

dirtrider

Jul 21, 2014, 7:36 AM

Same here.

 

+1

Pulse

Jul 21, 2014, 7:36 AM

Same here.

+1

Wonder Woman

Jul 21, 2014, 8:01 AM

I think testing is fantastic for the people who are racing for money. So in the older days this used to be for anyone holding a licence. Now however they make everyone take out a licence and I guess that is why they now test anyone and everyone.

 

But to be honest, when I was racing with the pro ladies I was very aware and careful what I took. However if I went and did a tour now and had flu or something, having paid in a fortune to ride this event and just to go and experience it and enjoy it. I wouldn't hesitate to think twice whether my painkiller was a banned substance or not, I would just take it.

 

So yay for testing but seriously, if you are going to do it, do it properly and test the people who need it, hence those racing for the prize money.

Wyatt Earp

Jul 21, 2014, 8:05 AM

Lot's of very clean living people on this thread, I am glad to see that they read every little wrapper and soda can, don't take meds when they are ill and are all racing for the podium.

South Africa must have the most professional cyclists per square spoke than any other nation in the world.

Wonder Woman

Jul 21, 2014, 8:11 AM

Lot's of very clean living people on this thread, I am glad to see that they read every little wrapper and soda can, don't take meds when they are ill and are all racing for the podium.

South Africa must have the most professional cyclists per square spoke than any other nation in the world.

 

???

Wyatt Earp

Jul 21, 2014, 8:16 AM

???

 

It's called reading the entire thread, lot's of good info in there.

You will learn that in South Africa we don't have amateurs, all riders are professional and testing random people who have no impact on the results will clean up the sport.

Frosty

Jul 21, 2014, 8:53 AM

Hold on, back to basics:

http://www.cyclingsa...ILE00000782.pdf - page 3

 

A LICENCE (FULL RACING for MASTER [Veteran]) costs R350, which according to the CyclingSA rules, is required if you wish to participate in the following events:

  • National Championships;
  • CyclingSA leagues;
  • Part of a team, with a team manager, and a following car.

This very same licence, according to their rules, is NOT REQUIRED for the following:

  • Provincial Champs;

To apply for this RACING LICENCE, the person must be a MEMBER of CSA and a provincial affiliate.

 

 

Therefore, anyone taking part in the open seeded categories, is not a licensed cyclist but a MEMBER.

The minimum requirement is MEMBERSHIP, and these fees are paid to CSA as well as the provincial body (if setup on their website). Currently for Central Gauteng, this costs R75 for CyclingSA MEMBERSHIP and R75 for CGC MEMBERSHIP. There is no mention of any LICENCE for these types of cyclists.

The UCI consider this a "CYCLING FOR ALL" category and is not classified under the LICENCE category.

 

A DAY LICENCE is charged to cyclists that are NOT MEMBERS of CSA

 

 

So, if this person that nobody knows, has been tested it is because he holds a FULL RACING LICENCE which he paid R350 for. He would fall into the MASTER (Veteran) category and according to the rules is subject to be tested.

 

 

In summary:

All LICENCE holders are subject to being tested, not MEMBERS or DAY LICENCE holders.

 

 

The debate about the costs to test VETS is another debate.

Spinnekop

Jul 21, 2014, 9:02 AM

The debate about the costs to test VETS is another debate.

 

Jip. Agree.

So let's do "Racing" and "Sportive".

Not age crap.

 

You either race or participate. Like Europe.

But better testing for the Race snakes.

 

But CSA will never go for this as the general income is generated from the participating peanuts and not the racing snakes.

Wonder Woman

Jul 21, 2014, 9:05 AM

It's called reading the entire thread, lot's of good info in there.

You will learn that in South Africa we don't have amateurs, all riders are professional and testing random people who have no impact on the results will clean up the sport.

 

Yes sorry, I missed a couple pages. :blush:

 

And kinda been out of racing for 4 years. Even any serious training. Real pleb these days.

Wonder Woman

Jul 21, 2014, 9:07 AM

Jip. Agree.

So let's do "Racing" and "Sportive".

Not age crap.

 

You either race or participate. Like Europe.

But better testing for the Race snakes.

 

But CSA will never go for this as the general income is generated from the participating peanuts and not the racing snakes.

 

I'm with you there.

Frosty

Jul 21, 2014, 9:41 AM

Jip. Agree.

So let's do "Racing" and "Sportive".

Not age crap.

 

You either race or participate. Like Europe.

But better testing for the Race snakes.

 

But CSA will never go for this as the general income is generated from the participating peanuts and not the racing snakes.

Makes it easier too to be issued with a single race number for the year.

You race in the same category at each race for the year.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment