Events

Kevin Evans accepts doping charge

By Press Office · 1614 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has charged mountain bike cyclist, Kevin Evans with doping after identifying serious irregularities in his Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) – a profile of the athlete’s blood parameters.

ccs-62657-0-90136700-1453116564.jpgPhoto credit: Dave Macleod/
Gameplan Media

Mr. Evans accepted the charge of doping and did not contest the findings. The ABP is a longitudinal analysis and the suspicious readings were identified over a period of time, therefore the athlete’s results extending back to 14 March 2014 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

He will be banned from sport for four years as of 4 March 2015 until 3 March 2019. The athlete has however indicated that he has retired from professional cycling.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process. Cycling South Africa further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Comments

schmoose

Jan 25, 2016, 10:25 AM

so this makes me a bit of a hypocrate.

 

Is that a crate that won't sit still?

Eldron

Jan 25, 2016, 10:28 AM

so this makes me a bit of a hypocrate.

Sadly. Yes.

 

It also shows how "easy" it is to find yourself on the wrong side of the law.

 

Safe option is - don't race when you suspect you've taken something illegal. Better to miss a few races than get crucified on the hub and twitter!

Tumbleweed

Jan 25, 2016, 10:29 AM

Is that a crate that won't sit still?

 

That's a hypercrate. Hypocrate is when you fall beneath one after drinking too much.

Paul Ruinaard

Jan 25, 2016, 10:29 AM

I think Kevin needs to put together a calm and reasoned statement on why he has not contested the finding - an HONEST one, and if things have not been above board anywhere, then appropriate reparations made, apologies issued etc

 

All this yelling and name calling on public media does not do the sport any good (Jules - are you listening? :) ) and the long term prospects for sponsorship get worse every day for athletes (especially for younger guys) the longer this carries on - no corporate wants to be associated with, or take the risk of being duped by a doper, and then have their name dragged through the mud publically.

 

Someone needs to hold free PR classes for pro athletes...

NIce idea however i think legally apologies are an admission of guilt open you to all sorts of legal consequences so unless you want to be liable aka Lance for fraud, perjury etc and the possible ramifications of that whole lot, so any legal person would tell you to stay quiet no matter how much you want to say sorry.

 

Maybe that is the reason for the very thin story......

 

And it seems like legal advice is what is causing this whole storm to have blown up. 

 

Damages done already are pretty considerable if you start to draw it out, so there are a lot of potential people who would be willing to take up cudgels and fund their own lawyers.

 

I think there are class action suits now in South Africa although I am not sure they are applicable here. Also not enough of a legal beagle to know about whistle blower cases like the USA where as the initiator you can benefit. Floyd Landis is looking to fund is future out of the money they are clawing back from Lance.

 

If I was Kevin I would also shut up and say nothing no matter how the twitter verse exploded and flamed him. 

RocknRolla

Jan 25, 2016, 10:34 AM

Sadly. Yes.

 

It also shows how "easy" it is to find yourself on the wrong side of the law.

 

Safe option is - don't race when you suspect you've taken something illegal. Better to miss a few races than get crucified on the hub and twitter!

 

 

dunnow how I am ever going to recover menally...oh wait.. i'm already over it...

RocknRolla

Jan 25, 2016, 10:36 AM

and all this hype about a crate...

Tumbleweed

Jan 25, 2016, 10:44 AM

NIce idea however i think legally apologies are an admission of guilt open you to all sorts of legal consequences so unless you want to be liable aka Lance for fraud, perjury etc and the possible ramifications of that whole lot, so any legal person would tell you to stay quiet no matter how much you want to say sorry.

 

Maybe that is the reason for the very thin story......

 

And it seems like legal advice is what is causing this whole storm to have blown up. 

 

Damages done already are pretty considerable if you start to draw it out, so there are a lot of potential people who would be willing to take up cudgels and fund their own lawyers.

 

I think there are class action suits now in South Africa although I am not sure they are applicable here. Also not enough of a legal beagle to know about whistle blower cases like the USA where as the initiator you can benefit. Floyd Landis is looking to fund is future out of the money they are clawing back from Lance.

 

If I was Kevin I would also shut up and say nothing no matter how the twitter verse exploded and flamed him. 

 

 

 

But this isn't a case of whistle-blowing.    

 

Oh, and Floyd seems to be getting nothing...

V12man

Jan 25, 2016, 10:45 AM

If I was Kevin I would also shut up and say nothing no matter how the twitter verse exploded and flamed him. 

Well - learning not to fan the flames would also be a good idea....

Paul Ruinaard

Jan 25, 2016, 11:00 AM

But this isn't a case of whistle-blowing.    

 

Oh, and Floyd seems to be getting nothing...

Sure agreed. 

 

Technically there were people blowing the whistle prior to the admission? See the handbag war on twitter. Which was then repudiated by some of the parties involved through their counsel.

 

FWIW and not sure if i am teaching you to suck eggs but it is  a particular class of law suit, where the person who makes the US IRS services aware of a fraud and they successfully prosecute , that person can be a beneficiary to the tune of a percentage of the reward.

 

Its a US thing, not sure its applicable here and it doesn't need you to be the first person to "blow the whistle" if you get what i am saying.

 

This one has many parallels......

 

Any many parties aggrieved, who may see common cause.

 

Then they get together and share costs. Also sometimes seen as a class action - US Law thrives on these.

 

So really not sure if it could happen here...

 

But there was an international event, so jurisdiction of international courts could be applicable to that.

 

You see how this gets ugly quickly

Spinnekop

Jan 25, 2016, 11:00 AM

Anyone ever read SAIDS's list of cycling-related doping cases?   :huh:

The info on the website seems outdated? Or am I looking at the wrong place?

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 11:08 AM

dunnow how I am ever going to recover menally...oh wait.. i'm already over it...

No crucifixion here. We're not in Jerusalem.

But it's easy to end up on the wrong side of the game even when not intending to break any rules / laws.

Tumbleweed

Jan 25, 2016, 11:09 AM

The info on the website seems outdated? Or am I looking at the wrong place?

 

Waaaaaaaaay outdated!

Patchelicious

Jan 25, 2016, 11:11 AM

What ever happened to that conversation between everybody that they refered too in that Instagram fight?

 

Did it ever come out as to what was said in this "meeting?"

Tumbleweed

Jan 25, 2016, 11:15 AM

Sure agreed. 

 

Technically there were people blowing the whistle prior to the admission? See the handbag war on twitter. Which was then repudiated by some of the parties involved through their counsel.

 

FWIW and not sure if i am teaching you to suck eggs but it is  a particular class of law suit, where the person who makes the US IRS services aware of a fraud and they successfully prosecute , that person can be a beneficiary to the tune of a percentage of the reward.

 

Its a US thing, not sure its applicable here and it doesn't need you to be the first person to "blow the whistle" if you get what i am saying.

 

This one has many parallels......

 

Any many parties aggrieved, who may see common cause.

 

Then they get together and share costs. Also sometimes seen as a class action - US Law thrives on these.

 

So really not sure if it could happen here...

 

But there was an international event, so jurisdiction of international courts could be applicable to that.

 

You see how this gets ugly quickly

 

The Floyd case was based on the fact that government funds were being used for illegal purposes. The point about this not being a whistle-blower case is that the sanction stems from anomalies being detected on the ABP. Not on the basis of the Twitter accusations. Floyd provided information on how the fraud was allegedly carried out. He could back it up. Converting an oft-repeated slander to a libel is not whistle-blowing.

Paul Ruinaard

Jan 25, 2016, 11:17 AM

The Floyd case was based on the fact that government funds were being used for illegal purposes. The point about this not being a whistle-blower case is that the sanction stems from anomalies being detected on the ABP. Not on the basis of the Twitter accusations. Floyd provided information on how the fraud was allegedly carried out. He could back it up. Converting an oft-repeated slander to a libel is not whistle-blowing.

aha thanks for the clarification.

 

Like I said I am not the legal genius but i could see common cause amount some of the parties involved.....

Guest Lancesball

Jan 25, 2016, 11:46 AM

Fair enough - brand awareness & sales not necessarily the same thing

 

Out of interest, you remember that Kevin Evans rode Volcon and Merckx bikes even though it happened aeons ago and the bikes not taking off - I would say that is a pretty good argument for how putting a pro on a your bike creates brand awareness!

 

I remember him being a rider on the Microsoft / MTN / Energade team as they lost and gained sponsors. They had those bikes as a sponsor. Same as Lampre riding Willier for many years until the Merida change.

rock

Jan 25, 2016, 12:19 PM

What ever happened to that conversation between everybody that they refered too in that Instagram fight?

 

Did it ever come out as to what was said in this "meeting?"

 

probably not this

 

http://cdn.meme.am/instances/45068686.jpg

Eldron

Jan 25, 2016, 2:03 PM

Our CSA could learn a thing or two from the other CSA.

 

This is how you deal with cheats: http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/bodi-banned-for-20-years-20160125

Shebeen

Jan 25, 2016, 2:22 PM

Wonder if the David George drug bust thread got up to 80+ pages?

BDF

Jan 25, 2016, 2:27 PM

IMO this thread is all but spent. Lines drawn, walls up, opinions concreted in. Now just arguing for the sake of wanting to have the last word.

:nuke:

NelAndre

Jan 25, 2016, 2:32 PM

I am still not sure if the OldCoot was in cahoots?

Tim Brink

Jan 25, 2016, 3:13 PM

IMO this thread is all but spent. Lines drawn, walls up, opinions concreted in. Now just arguing for the sake of wanting to have the last word.

:nuke:

Nonsense!

Tumbleweed

Jan 25, 2016, 3:38 PM

Nonsense!

 

Totally.
GLuvsMtb

Jan 25, 2016, 3:53 PM

IMO this thread is all but spent. Lines drawn, walls up, opinions concreted in. Now just arguing for the sake of wanting to have the last word.

:nuke:

I think it would have been dead if any of the following happened (or did not happen):

Did not happen:

- wifey blew her gaskit on Twatter

- buddy who sponsored him for years didn't toilet his name and his company on Twatter

 

Did happen:

- Evans made a clear statement on why he is not contesting the charges

- CSA and SAIDS made a clear statement on whether it was only the period after his medical situation that returned suspicious numbers or whether other tests also pointed to systematic doping.

 

Now we have experts querying the vague and open-ended statements made by Evans, SAIDS and CSA, some very knowledgable people commenting here and on other platforms and the rest of us ordering popcorn.

Cookmeister

Jan 25, 2016, 4:42 PM

!

Add a comment

You must log in to comment