Events

Kevin Evans accepts doping charge

By Press Office · 1614 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has charged mountain bike cyclist, Kevin Evans with doping after identifying serious irregularities in his Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) – a profile of the athlete’s blood parameters.

ccs-62657-0-90136700-1453116564.jpgPhoto credit: Dave Macleod/
Gameplan Media

Mr. Evans accepted the charge of doping and did not contest the findings. The ABP is a longitudinal analysis and the suspicious readings were identified over a period of time, therefore the athlete’s results extending back to 14 March 2014 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

He will be banned from sport for four years as of 4 March 2015 until 3 March 2019. The athlete has however indicated that he has retired from professional cycling.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process. Cycling South Africa further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Comments

jcza

Jan 25, 2016, 8:31 AM

why is this the only course of action? Are there no alternative paths?

 

I thought the alternative path ended when KE accepted the charge and subsequent ban? 

andydude

Jan 25, 2016, 8:31 AM

You would need to ask him if that's the real reason but I heard that that is why he raced without the TUE.

I'm merely placing other views on the table

To continue with your scenario, is it ok to cheat & dope if you are riding for appearance and not trying to win?
Andrew Steer

Jan 25, 2016, 8:32 AM

why is this the only course of action? Are there no alternative paths?

 

There are many paths...

 

Twitter Mud slinging avenue should not be one though - even if it would appear to be very popular this time of year

BarHugger

Jan 25, 2016, 8:35 AM

Only after the money then?

Aren't we all ......

 

 

So surely you distance yourself from it all??

 

He's fighting the wrong corner...

 

But what would most people have done....it's easy for us to sit on a forum and give opinions but we are not emotionally involved...emotions can change the entire perspective.....

BarHugger

Jan 25, 2016, 8:36 AM

To continue with your scenario, is it ok to cheat & dope if you are riding for appearance and not trying to win?

But then what's the point...you dope to win....

rock

Jan 25, 2016, 8:36 AM

So which brands is he the agent for.

 

he is out of the industry now. 

 

he was the first chairman of SAMBA iiirc,

 

Started Sedgefield Fat Tyre Festival etc.

V12man

Jan 25, 2016, 8:37 AM

It's Kevin that has dropped the ball, Kevin that is cheapening his whole career, all his results, all his sponsors by walking away and not contesting any of this.

I think Kevin needs to put together a calm and reasoned statement on why he has not contested the finding - an HONEST one, and if things have not been above board anywhere, then appropriate reparations made, apologies issued etc

 

All this yelling and name calling on public media does not do the sport any good (Jules - are you listening? :) ) and the long term prospects for sponsorship get worse every day for athletes (especially for younger guys) the longer this carries on - no corporate wants to be associated with, or take the risk of being duped by a doper, and then have their name dragged through the mud publically.

 

Someone needs to hold free PR classes for pro athletes...

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 8:38 AM

I thought the alternative path ended when KE accepted the charge and subsequent ban? 

 

 

Why would the alternative path end? Must BE obey to Bikehub blogger pressure and condemn a rider that has delivered results?

Hence questioning the vitriol being leveled at him. He's accepted the ban. Explained his situation and moved on. BE is on the alternative path. He's defending someone who he is obviously close too.

every other scenario being portrayed is just speculation and the baying for blood on twatbook and bikehub is akin to a tar an feather mob.

 

Now there's a non factual history being written which seems to want to be accepted as truth without further input? Is this behaviour any better?

andydude

Jan 25, 2016, 8:38 AM

But then what's the point...you dope to win....

Of course. Was just playing along with raptor's scenario to see where it goes.
V12man

Jan 25, 2016, 8:39 AM

He sold Raleigh's pal... what do you think  :w00t:

Gently mate.... i own and ride a Raleigh.... great bike.... :)

HairyLegs

Jan 25, 2016, 8:40 AM

he is out of the industry now. 

 

he was the first chairman of SAMBA iiirc,

 

Started Sedgefield Fat Tyre Festival etc.

 

http://www.rushsports.co.za/blogs/news/75588547-rush-sports-appoints-brandon-els-as-non-executive-director-05-11-2015

jcza

Jan 25, 2016, 8:41 AM

Why would the alternative path end? Must BE obey to Bikehub blogger pressure and condemn a rider that has delivered results?

Hence questioning the vitriol being leveled at him. He's accepted the ban. Explained his situation and moved on. BE is on the alternative path. He's defending someone who he is obviously close too.

every other scenario being portrayed is just speculation and the baying for blood on twatbook and bikehub is akin to a tar an feather mob.

 

Now there's a non factual history being written which seems to want to be accepted as truth without further input? Is this behaviour any better?

 

Path ends for KE as he is guilty as charged and banned. The End. 

 

BE has nothing to gain and everything to lose. 

Danger Dassie

Jan 25, 2016, 8:41 AM

So surely you distance yourself from it all??

 

He's fighting the wrong corner...

 

True, but also with Twitter things can all to often be pulled out of context and topic. He was baited a few times and not being one to back down reacted to that accordingly as he felt, and people continued. There's a complete irony to the accusation of being a bully.

 

He should have just left it yes, the benefit of hindsight, outside observers and all that. None of us are perfect.

 

Twitter is for ragers, rational discussion is maybe 10% of the time. Nothing to do with being against or defending doping, it's about how people feel about THEIR opinion and the ensuing drama attraction. Nothing more, nothing less. 

Personally, I find it pathetic and the resulting back biting, sniping and antics as a result are as bad as the doping itself, on all sides.

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 8:42 AM

To continue with your scenario, is it ok to cheat & dope if you are riding for appearance and not trying to win?

 

 

Is it cheating if you trying to win....?

 

 

so try not to look at that as a justification for doping but as a justification that even ill people should be given the opportunity to participate.

 

what is the difference between competing and participating?

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 8:44 AM

But then what's the point...you dope to win....

 

 

 

Do you?

 

Are there no alternatives to this or is the world black and white?

Andrew Steer

Jan 25, 2016, 8:44 AM

Gently mate.... i own and ride a Raleigh.... great bike.... :)

 

A Real Raleigh (from UK), or the rebranded local ones...

 

I read a book once "It's not about the bike"

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 8:45 AM

Do you?

 

Are there no alternatives to this or is the world black and white?

 

Should a diabetic stay on the couch?

 

Should an asthmatic live in a fresh air tent?

 

Should a recovering cancer patient not ride the Argust? Despite the fact that they may still be pumped up with UCI banned substances?

Andrew Steer

Jan 25, 2016, 8:46 AM

A Real Raleigh (from UK), or the rebranded local ones...

 

I read a book once "It's not about the bike"

 

PS: Nothing wrong with either... those local ones were incredible value, and regardless of the minimal performance gains any bike could give me, my engine will always be the big let down  :blush:

jcza

Jan 25, 2016, 8:46 AM

True, but also with Twitter things can all to often be pulled out of context and topic. He was baited a few times and not being one to back down reacted to that accordingly as he felt, and people continued. There's a complete irony to the accusation of being a bully.

 

He should have just left it yes, the benefit of hindsight, outside observers and all that. None of us are perfect.

 

Twitter is for ragers, rational discussion is maybe 10% of the time. Nothing to do with being against or defending doping, it's about how people feel about THEIR opinion and the ensuing drama attraction. Nothing more, nothing less. 

Personally, I find it pathetic and the resulting back biting, sniping and antics as a result are as bad as the doping itself, on all sides.

 

Sounds like the hub

BarHugger

Jan 25, 2016, 8:47 AM

He was baited a few times and not being one to back down reacted to that accordingly as he felt, and people continued. 

Very much the same thing that happens here on The Hub...and often the baiters get public sympathy when things explode...looking back over that ORIGINAL war this past weekend....things got pretty ugly....

jcza

Jan 25, 2016, 8:47 AM

 

Do you?

 

Are there no alternatives to this or is the world black and white?

 

Should a diabetic stay on the couch?

 

Should an asthmatic live in a fresh air tent?

 

Should a recovering cancer patient not ride the Argust? Despite the fact that they may still be pumped up with UCI banned substances?

 

 

Download and fill in the required form and obtain a TUE 

rouxtjie

Jan 25, 2016, 8:47 AM

Sounds like the hub

Its the 20/20 version  :ph34r:

raptor-22

Jan 25, 2016, 8:48 AM

Path ends for KE as he is guilty as charged and banned. The End. 

 

BE has nothing to gain and everything to lose. 

 

 

ok so you're in the black and white camp.

noted

BarHugger

Jan 25, 2016, 8:48 AM

 

Do you?

 

Are there no alternatives to this or is the world black and white?

 

Should a diabetic stay on the couch?

 

Should an asthmatic live in a fresh air tent?

 

Should a recovering cancer patient not ride the Argust? Despite the fact that they may still be pumped up with UCI banned substances?

 

Of course not....but if they want to compete then they are welcome to a TUE....

rouxtjie

Jan 25, 2016, 8:49 AM

ok so you're in the black and white camp.

noted

Kind of has to be when money is involved....there is process and consequence. Being a "pro" isn't just trapping your bike.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment