Events

Kevin Evans accepts doping charge

By Press Office · 1614 comments

Cycling South Africa reports that the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has charged mountain bike cyclist, Kevin Evans with doping after identifying serious irregularities in his Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) – a profile of the athlete’s blood parameters.

ccs-62657-0-90136700-1453116564.jpgPhoto credit: Dave Macleod/
Gameplan Media

Mr. Evans accepted the charge of doping and did not contest the findings. The ABP is a longitudinal analysis and the suspicious readings were identified over a period of time, therefore the athlete’s results extending back to 14 March 2014 will be disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes.

He will be banned from sport for four years as of 4 March 2015 until 3 March 2019. The athlete has however indicated that he has retired from professional cycling.

Cycling South Africa respects the independence of the SAIDS process. Cycling South Africa further reiterates its zero-tolerance approach to doping in sport and will continue working with SAIDS in the promotion of a drug-free sport via its awareness and extensive testing programmes.

Comments

Martin PJ

Jan 21, 2016, 1:40 PM

 

So, in other news

 

Jeroen Swart

@JeroenSwart

Just in case anyone might be a little confused: Ozone therapy given in whatever form has absolutely NO effect on biological passport values.

 

 

 

2:16pm · 21 Jan 2016 · Twitter for iPhone

 

 

We used ozone to bleach pulp in a paper factory I worked in. It replaced chlorine, but was a bit worse. I cannot see how it could affect blood values, beyond a placebo effect. It may actually do some damage as it is quite reactive.

Shebeen

Jan 21, 2016, 1:43 PM

 

So, in other news

 

 

@JeroenSwart

@JeroenSwart

Just in case anyone might be a little confused: Ozone therapy given in whatever form has absolutely NO effect on biological passport values.

 

 

 

2:16pm · 21 Jan 2016 · [url=http://twitter.com/download/iphone]Twitter for iPhone

was just listening on cape talk and they had Dr ross tucker in studio. Guess who phones in to clarify an answer to a question ross didn't want to go in too much detail on... Yup jeroen.
V12man

Jan 21, 2016, 1:48 PM

I've only twice in my life walked out of a lecture because I simply couldn't stomach another word of bull**** from an "evangelical preacher"..............both times it was about the use of ozone. Most of the health professions have come to the same conclusion.

Lately I hear that the peddlers of ozone are targeting farmers and veterinarians with their miracle cure. Treat the cows and the milk won't go bad, the veal will taste better and have no prohibited drugs in......... :ph34r:

And your thoughts on peroxide treatment?    #justcurious :)

Tumbleweed

Jan 21, 2016, 1:48 PM

was just listening on cape talk and they had Dr ross tucker in studio. Guess who phones in to clarify an answer to a question ross didn't want to go in too much detail on... Yup jeroen.

 

What was the question that Tucker was avoiding?

V12man

Jan 21, 2016, 1:54 PM

I am not saying that EPO wont kill you but you will need a Hct of about 80% or more to actually cause death.

80% will probably cause death by a whole host of other complications - heart will struggle to pump that load for sure - it's going to be thicker than SAE100 gearbox oil, and random clotting and DVT's will be a huge issue - definately not advisable.

Spinnekop

Jan 21, 2016, 2:11 PM

because they dope so much they can train more?

Nope.

Because they (I)  have a life and kids and families and have to train harder in order to be faster and fitter. 

Spinnekop

Jan 21, 2016, 2:16 PM

Since you're all about facts and evidence, how about quoting some to back up how great the effect and reach of this story is. Without them, your post above is only opinion.   

 

Ask your average customer who comes into the bike shop on Saturday what he or she thinks about Kevin Evans. Chances are - and this is opinion - most will say "who?"  

 

It's funny that you attack the use of anecdote yet roll out plenty of your own.

Tumbles.

You have to admit......it all depends upon which bike shop.  Mine will all know who and what he is. 

It all

Andrew Steer

Jan 21, 2016, 2:21 PM

80% will probably cause death by a whole host of other complications - heart will struggle to pump that load for sure - it's going to be thicker than SAE100 gearbox oil, and random clotting and DVT's will be a huge issue - definately not advisable.

 

Isn't 50 hematocrit the safety mark? Riis was famous for being up near 60 at the peaks of his prowess... 

 

Guest Lancesball

Jan 21, 2016, 2:22 PM

Since you're all about facts and evidence, how about quoting some to back up how great the effect and reach of this story is. Without them, your post above is only opinion.   

 

Ask your average customer who comes into the bike shop on Saturday what he or she thinks about Kevin Evans. Chances are - and this is opinion - most will say "who?"  

 

It's funny that you attack the use of anecdote yet roll out plenty of your own.

 

Evidence in the support and outcries? Please go read the Rourke, David George and Brandon threads on their positives, read twitter posts by people, facebook etc. There is proof.

 

I dont attack anything, dont fabric stuff up cause you now being questioned, not agreed with or challenged on a post. There is a huge difference. 

 

Who's attacking who now??

Guest Lancesball

Jan 21, 2016, 2:24 PM

What was the question that Tucker was avoiding?

 

How come you get fat ( ok, put on weight during a stage race) He couldnt asnwer that. It even suprised my boyfriend that he didn't know this.

BarHugger

Jan 21, 2016, 2:30 PM

Isn't 50 hematocrit the safety mark? Riis was famous for being up near 60 at the peaks of his prowess... 

 

Riis is the dirtiest of the lot....

Tumbleweed

Jan 21, 2016, 2:36 PM

Evidence in the support and outcries? Please go read the Rourke, David George and Brandon threads on their positives, read twitter posts by people, facebook etc. There is proof.

 

I dont attack anything, dont fabric stuff up cause you now being questioned, not agreed with or challenged on a post. There is a huge difference. 

 

Who's attacking who now??

 

So you're sticking with "poop load" then?

 

Cool. :thumbup:

jcza

Jan 21, 2016, 2:44 PM

Isn't 50 hematocrit the safety mark? Riis was famous for being up near 60 at the peaks of his prowess... 

 

 

Its a benchmark and if the team is a member of MPCC riders won't be allowed to start. They call it a health check, however, a number of riders apparently are born with higher levels and others are thought to dope up to that level. DG fell foul of this while riding in Europe years back. 

V12man

Jan 21, 2016, 2:48 PM

Isn't 50 hematocrit the safety mark? Riis was famous for being up near 60 at the peaks of his prowess... 

 

Well - 50 is the limit UCI has set - never ever seen anyone with a 50 naturally.... they may be out there, but they are few and far between.

 

I have never seen a study on a safe limit - not sure that would pass an ethics comittee as a study proposal - I will ask around in cardiology next time I see someone.

Tumbleweed

Jan 21, 2016, 2:49 PM

Its a benchmark and if the team is a member of MPCC riders won't be allowed to start. They call it a health check, however, a number of riders apparently are born with higher levels and others are thought to dope up to that level. DG fell foul of this while riding in Europe years back. 

 

It's been said that calling the immediate suspensions they used to hand out for being above a level for health reasons was the only way the authorities could claw one back on the dopers at a time when there was no test for EPO.

Guest Lancesball

Jan 21, 2016, 2:54 PM

So you're sticking with "poop load" then?

 

Cool. :thumbup:

 

post-83977-0-23962100-1453388074_thumb.png

jcza

Jan 21, 2016, 2:56 PM

Well - 50 is the limit UCI has set - never ever seen anyone with a 50 naturally.... they may be out there, but they are few and far between.

 

I have never seen a study on a safe limit - not sure that would pass an ethics comittee as a study proposal - I will ask around in cardiology next time I see someone.

 

A couple of cyclists with levels above 50%, only name that comes to mind is Charlie Wegulius. Had to prove that he was abnormal. Best remembered as the rider that raced for team instead of country at Worlds.  

RocknRolla

Jan 21, 2016, 3:01 PM

I am learning so much from this thread...

It's the biology class I never attended at school.

Paul Ruinaard

Jan 21, 2016, 3:01 PM

Heres the thing - we clearly care about this stuff as this thread is now running 50 pages and its still getting more interesting and informative.

 

This is a pretty fascinating topic and its pretty much a tragicomedy in the way that it has panned out with all nuances of the people involved having added their 2 cents along the way. Its like we all knew this was likely - we dreaded that it could be true and we hoped that it wasn't. But like in the movies the story has unravelled in such a way that it makes movie scripts and series look tame - their script writers could write this and we wouldn't watch it as we would say its too far fetched.

 

I am continually fascinated by the psyche of the dopers as well as the righteous indignation they show when caught - this is what keeps me hooked on this topic - Lance, Kevin, Tyler, Rourke - basically all very similar.....

 

 

Tumbleweed

Jan 21, 2016, 3:03 PM

A couple of cyclists with levels above 50%, only name that comes to mind is Charlie Wegulius. Had to prove that he was abnormal. Best remembered as the rider that raced for team instead of country at Worlds.  

 

Ricco claimed to have a naturally high level too...but then again, he was getting his gear at McD's.

V12man

Jan 21, 2016, 3:09 PM

A couple of cyclists with levels above 50%, only name that comes to mind is Charlie Wegulius. Had to prove that he was abnormal. Best remembered as the rider that raced for team instead of country at Worlds.  

Couple of mountain climbers have documented levels over 50 - this might be nature or nurture or something else - like I say it's not a normal number - if I saw one over 50 I would probably get the test repeated thinking they had made a mistake....

Shebeen

Jan 21, 2016, 3:11 PM

so is this going to be the #dopefriday thread?

Paul Ruinaard

Jan 21, 2016, 3:16 PM

so is this going to be the #dopefriday thread?

So far its the dopest thread of the year

BarHugger

Jan 21, 2016, 3:19 PM

so is this going to be the #dopefriday thread?

#fosho.........laddies, bring the handbags........#doppingweekendstaystrong

andydude

Jan 21, 2016, 4:01 PM

 

 

Well - 50 is the limit UCI has set - never ever seen anyone with a 50 naturally.... they may be out there, but they are few and far between.

 

I have never seen a study on a safe limit - not sure that would pass an ethics comittee as a study proposal - I will ask around in cardiology next time I see someone.

This is perhaps a good time in explaining why people that say doping levels the playing field are wrong.

 

What the guys do that's below 50 is that they take epo to push it to high 40s/close to 50, the UCI limit. I think Lance's natural level was in the low 40s, thus he could improve quite a lot. Other guys' natural level is closer to 50 and can't increase it anymore.

 

That's my simple understanding, so please help/explain more if you can.

Add a comment

You must log in to comment